| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer
The hurricane has been gone for days. It punied out up North today. NO
other storms are within two days and they are NOT EXPECTED to fall upon US or cause problems in the water nearby. So why is K1MAN STILL Blabcasting on 14.275 calling for "volunteer jump teams" ?? Over and over and over again. If you want to hear real ham radio in action in this emergency or the next then listen to 14265, the SATERN radio system. www.satern.org Dan/W4NTI |
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote So why is K1MAN STILL Blabcasting on 14.275 calling for "volunteer jump teams" ?? Over and over and over again. Glenn got another love letter from FCC (copies to US District Attorney/Assistant US District Attorney)dated the 15th of last month. He has 20 days to shape up and explain how he's going to clean up his act. "Failure to correct the violations will subject you to enforcement action against your station and operator licenses." Now if they could shut down that religious whacko broadcasting the bible 24/7 at 7.030. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
KØHB wrote:
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote So why is K1MAN STILL Blabcasting on 14.275 calling for "volunteer jump teams" ?? Over and over and over again. Glenn got another love letter from FCC (copies to US District Attorney/Assistant US District Attorney)dated the 15th of last month. He has 20 days to shape up and explain how he's going to clean up his act. "Failure to correct the violations will subject you to enforcement action against your station and operator licenses." Now if they could shut down that religious whacko broadcasting the bible 24/7 at 7.030. It's exactly as I thought from their April letter to him, in which they say that he is "generally in compliance with the Commission's rules in the Amateur Service related to broadcasting and information bulletins" As soon as they did that, he should have felt the noose tightening. It only meant that they had him on other things. So now there is NO argument that "W1AW does it, why can't Glenn" . hehe, the wheels of the gods turn slowly, but they do turn. buh-bye! - Mike KB3EIA - |
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net...
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote So why is K1MAN STILL Blabcasting on 14.275 calling for "volunteer jump teams" ?? Over and over and over again. Glenn got another love letter from FCC (copies to US District Attorney/Assistant US District Attorney)dated the 15th of last month. He has 20 days to shape up and explain how he's going to clean up his act. "Failure to correct the violations will subject you to enforcement action against your station and operator licenses." Now if they could shut down that religious whacko broadcasting the bible 24/7 at 7.030. 73, de Hans, K0HB 7.030 huh? Isn't that the CW subband? How appropriate. |
"William" wrote Isn't that the CW subband? Last time I checked all of 40 meters was a CW band? What's your point? That even the Xtians know morse? |
Now if they could shut down that religious whacko broadcasting the bible 24/7 at 7.030. 73, de Hans, K0HB 7.030 huh? Isn't that the CW subband? How appropriate. Is he doing it with Morse code? |
"Robert Casey" wrote Is he doing it with Morse code? Yes, passing it off as "code practice", 24/7 for several weeks now. |
|
"KØHB" wrote in message link.net...
"Robert Casey" wrote Is he doing it with Morse code? Yes, passing it off as "code practice", 24/7 for several weeks now. I think we need to hear again from the PCTA that there's never been a case of bad behavior while using CW. Hi, hi! |
"KØHB" wrote in message
k.net... Now if they could shut down that religious whacko broadcasting the bible 24/7 at 7.030. 73, de Hans, K0HB Amen! -- Vy 73 de Bert WA2SI FISTS #9384 |
"KØHB" wrote in message k.net... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote So why is K1MAN STILL Blabcasting on 14.275 calling for "volunteer jump teams" ?? Over and over and over again. Glenn got another love letter from FCC (copies to US District Attorney/Assistant US District Attorney)dated the 15th of last month. He has 20 days to shape up and explain how he's going to clean up his act. "Failure to correct the violations will subject you to enforcement action against your station and operator licenses." Now if they could shut down that religious whacko broadcasting the bible 24/7 at 7.030. 73, de Hans, K0HB But that is code practice, right? Dan/W4NTI |
"William" wrote in message om... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Robert Casey" wrote Is he doing it with Morse code? Yes, passing it off as "code practice", 24/7 for several weeks now. I think we need to hear again from the PCTA that there's never been a case of bad behavior while using CW. Hi, hi! Who says this loon knows CW? You actually think he is sitting there with his little keyer and sending 24/7 code practice? You need help anti-coder. I recommend a .38 caliber. Dan/W4NTI |
Now if they could shut down that religious whacko broadcasting the bible 24/7 at 7.030. Amen! Praise the Lord, no more religious programming! "Luhn 4:22, And after a long day of saving souls, Jesus and the apostles went for some beers at the local watering hole." :-) |
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message ink.net...
"William" wrote in message om... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Robert Casey" wrote Is he doing it with Morse code? Yes, passing it off as "code practice", 24/7 for several weeks now. I think we need to hear again from the PCTA that there's never been a case of bad behavior while using CW. Hi, hi! Who says this loon knows CW? You actually think he is sitting there with his little keyer and sending 24/7 code practice? You need help anti-coder. I recommend a .38 caliber. Dan/W4NTI Dan, I see that you are another peace loving PCTA. At least you recommend something having a little more finesse than a flying brick or slashed tires! Hi, hi! WRT Amateur Radio Broadcasting, do you actually think that W1AW is sending code practice with a j-38? Sheesh! |
"William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message ink.net... "William" wrote in message om... "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Robert Casey" wrote Is he doing it with Morse code? Yes, passing it off as "code practice", 24/7 for several weeks now. I think we need to hear again from the PCTA that there's never been a case of bad behavior while using CW. Hi, hi! Who says this loon knows CW? You actually think he is sitting there with his little keyer and sending 24/7 code practice? You need help anti-coder. I recommend a .38 caliber. Dan/W4NTI Dan, I see that you are another peace loving PCTA. At least you recommend something having a little more finesse than a flying brick or slashed tires! Hi, hi! WRT Amateur Radio Broadcasting, do you actually think that W1AW is sending code practice with a j-38? Sheesh! Of course they are not. It is all canned. But it really IS code practice, this loon on 7030 is doing nothing but sending Bible gibberish at the same speed.....24/7. So you compare this to K1MAN and W1AW next, right? Dan/W4NTI |
"William" wrote Tell it to God, especially the gibberish part. Those of us not a member of that cult would prefer that the gibberish cease. |
"KØHB" wrote in message link.net...
"William" wrote Tell it to God, especially the gibberish part. Those of us not a member of that cult would prefer that the gibberish cease. Not a problem. Petition your government to eliminate Amendment #1. PLONK bb |
Subject: K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer
From: (William) Date: 10/5/2004 10:24 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "KØHB" wrote in message hlink.net... "William" wrote Tell it to God, especially the gibberish part. Those of us not a member of that cult would prefer that the gibberish cease. Not a problem. Petition your government to eliminate Amendment #1. PLONK READ the First Ammendment, Brain. Do you KNOW what it says and to whom it applies? Steve, K4YZ |
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message k.net...
"William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... As for the BARF.....the answer is simple, about 70 licensed amateurs joined it. All of which were either braindead, or stupid. Perhaps both. Dan/W4NTI Were the barf members CW tested? As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense. Dan/W4NTI I haven't seen any evidence of it either. But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA. bb |
William wrote:
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message k.net... "William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... As for the BARF.....the answer is simple, about 70 licensed amateurs joined it. All of which were either braindead, or stupid. Perhaps both. Dan/W4NTI Were the barf members CW tested? As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense. Dan/W4NTI I haven't seen any evidence of it either. But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA. You passed a morse exam, did you not? Dave K8MN |
"William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message k.net... "William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... As for the BARF.....the answer is simple, about 70 licensed amateurs joined it. All of which were either braindead, or stupid. Perhaps both. Dan/W4NTI Were the barf members CW tested? As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense. Dan/W4NTI I haven't seen any evidence of it either. But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA. bb It was never a "battle cry". Instead it was an observation of human nature. The more work that a person has put in to obtain something, the less likely that they will act in a manner to jeopardize it. It was not touted as a guarantee that someone would not misbehave but that it would keep the number who did smaller than it would otherwise be. There is not, never has been and never will be a panacea that will prevent all misbehavior. This too is human behavior. Some will flout standards and rules just to show that they can or because they have no sense or because they don't know any better or any other number of reasons. The best that we can do is to make the amount of effort to obtain a license reasonably high so that fewer people are willing to risk losing it. As a partner to this, the enforcement and penalties need to be reasonably high so that fewer people will risk that in addition to losing their license. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message k.net... "William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... As for the BARF.....the answer is simple, about 70 licensed amateurs joined it. All of which were either braindead, or stupid. Perhaps both. Dan/W4NTI Were the barf members CW tested? As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense. Dan/W4NTI I haven't seen any evidence of it either. But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA. You passed a morse exam, did you not? Dave K8MN As did you. |
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message k.net... "William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... As for the BARF.....the answer is simple, about 70 licensed amateurs joined it. All of which were either braindead, or stupid. Perhaps both. Dan/W4NTI Were the barf members CW tested? As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense. Dan/W4NTI I haven't seen any evidence of it either. But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA. You passed a morse exam, did you not? As did you. I was aware that I passed several of 'em. This "battle cry" you wrote of--is it "As in front of the FCC!", "Most Certainly!" or "I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense!"? Dave K8MN |
Subject: K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer
From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 10/12/2004 10:12 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "William" wrote in message . com... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message nk.net... "William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... As for the BARF.....the answer is simple, about 70 licensed amateurs joined it. All of which were either braindead, or stupid. Perhaps both. Dan/W4NTI Were the barf members CW tested? As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense. Dan/W4NTI I haven't seen any evidence of it either. But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA. bb It was never a "battle cry". Instead it was an observation of human nature. And it's not just Amateur Radio. I'd like for Brain and others to name ANYthing that, by being made "easier" to obtain, made it "better", other than healthcare and a good meal. An education?? A Mercedes Benz?? A seat on the board of a Fortune 500 company? The more work that a person has put in to obtain something, the less likely that they will act in a manner to jeopardize it. It was not touted as a guarantee that someone would not misbehave but that it would keep the number who did smaller than it would otherwise be. There is not, never has been and never will be a panacea that will prevent all misbehavior. This too is human behavior. Some will flout standards and rules just to show that they can or because they have no sense or because they don't know any better or any other number of reasons. Absolutely. The best that we can do is to make the amount of effort to obtain a license reasonably high so that fewer people are willing to risk losing it. In this I disagree, Dee...The degree of difficulty should be "high" so as to meet the intent of 97.1, the Basis and Purpose of the Amateur Radio Service, and that is to ensure technical and operational comptencies of the licensee. Part of 97.1 is to create a pool of self trained operators and persons knowldegeable in the radio arts. That license structure should be established in such a way that greater knowldege and skill grants ever-expanding privildege. And before "someone" jumps on "skill" as meaning just Morse Code proficiency, I think that there should be a requirement to show actual participation in Amateur Radio much that same as it was once required before one could apply for the Extra. I don't have a "plan" for such a requirement, but I would imagine it would include demonstrated competencies in operational skills and validation of learned knowledge. Of course that would mean a testing cirteria that didn't give you the answers before you took the test. As a partner to this, the enforcement and penalties need to be reasonably high so that fewer people will risk that in addition to losing their license. Absolutely again. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message ... Subject: K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 10/12/2004 10:12 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "William" wrote in message . com... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message nk.net... "William" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... As for the BARF.....the answer is simple, about 70 licensed amateurs joined it. All of which were either braindead, or stupid. Perhaps both. Dan/W4NTI Were the barf members CW tested? As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense. Dan/W4NTI I haven't seen any evidence of it either. But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA. bb It was never a "battle cry". Instead it was an observation of human nature. And it's not just Amateur Radio. I'd like for Brain and others to name ANYthing that, by being made "easier" to obtain, made it "better", other than healthcare and a good meal. An education?? A Mercedes Benz?? A seat on the board of a Fortune 500 company? The more work that a person has put in to obtain something, the less likely that they will act in a manner to jeopardize it. It was not touted as a guarantee that someone would not misbehave but that it would keep the number who did smaller than it would otherwise be. There is not, never has been and never will be a panacea that will prevent all misbehavior. This too is human behavior. Some will flout standards and rules just to show that they can or because they have no sense or because they don't know any better or any other number of reasons. Absolutely. The best that we can do is to make the amount of effort to obtain a license reasonably high so that fewer people are willing to risk losing it. In this I disagree, Dee...The degree of difficulty should be "high" so as to meet the intent of 97.1, the Basis and Purpose of the Amateur Radio Service, and that is to ensure technical and operational comptencies of the licensee. Part of 97.1 is to create a pool of self trained operators and persons knowldegeable in the radio arts. That license structure should be established in such a way that greater knowldege and skill grants ever-expanding privildege. Of course it must meet the requirements of Part 97 as its primary purpose but the problem is who is to define the standards as to what constitutes technical competency, operational competency, self trained operators, and persons knowledgeable in the radio arts. There are already movements in progress claiming that we do not need the standards being used today to meet Part 97 not only in code proficiency but also in technical, operational, and regulatory areas. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Subject: K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer
From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 10/13/2004 9:28 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message ... Part of 97.1 is to create a pool of self trained operators and persons knowldegeable in the radio arts. That license structure should be established in such a way that greater knowldege and skill grants ever-expanding privildege. Of course it must meet the requirements of Part 97 as its primary purpose but the problem is who is to define the standards as to what constitutes technical competency, operational competency, self trained operators, and persons knowledgeable in the radio arts. The same way it's done today...The FCC would set the objective and the VEC's would ahve to create the "questions" for thier approval. The VE's would then be given a set of "MET/NOT MET" criteria to check off an applicant on. (logbook entries, certificates of completion, etc...) There are already movements in progress claiming that we do not need the standards being used today to meet Part 97 not only in code proficiency but also in technical, operational, and regulatory areas. Uh huh. Here we go..."No Test International" rears it's ugly head. It was bound to happen! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ...
Of course it must meet the requirements of Part 97 as its primary purpose but the problem is who is to define the standards Who? Steve will handle it. as to what constitutes technical competency, operational competency, self trained operators, and persons knowledgeable in the radio arts. There are already movements in progress claiming that we do not need the standards being used today to meet Part 97 not only in code proficiency but also in technical, operational, and regulatory areas. Only disgruntled PCTA have propped up that strawman. Are you one of them? |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
I was aware that I passed several of 'em. At least your long-term memory is intact. This "battle cry" you wrote of--is it "As in front of the FCC!", "Most Certainly!" or "I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense!"? Dave K8MN None of the above. Aaron Jones has it fully documented. It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." |
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... I was aware that I passed several of 'em. At least your long-term memory is intact. This "battle cry" you wrote of--is it "As in front of the FCC!", "Most Certainly!" or "I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense!"? None of the above. Aaron Jones has it fully documented. That simply can't be. Dan's statement was: "As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense." You replied: "But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA." Now you tell us that none of the things Dan stated are the item which you claim was a PCTA battle cry. It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Dave K8MN |
"William" wrote in message om... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ... Of course it must meet the requirements of Part 97 as its primary purpose but the problem is who is to define the standards Who? Steve will handle it. as to what constitutes technical competency, operational competency, self trained operators, and persons knowledgeable in the radio arts. There are already movements in progress claiming that we do not need the standards being used today to meet Part 97 not only in code proficiency but also in technical, operational, and regulatory areas. Only disgruntled PCTA have propped up that strawman. Are you one of them? I am stating an observation. There have been proposals/petitions submitted to the FCC that very clearly state proposed new requirements for written testing that are less difficult than exists today. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Subject: K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer
From: Dave Heil Date: 10/13/2004 10:18 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... I was aware that I passed several of 'em. At least your long-term memory is intact. This "battle cry" you wrote of--is it "As in front of the FCC!", "Most Certainly!" or "I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense!"? None of the above. Aaron Jones has it fully documented. That simply can't be. Dan's statement was: "As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense." You replied: "But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA." Now you tell us that none of the things Dan stated are the item which you claim was a PCTA battle cry. It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. Neither have I. Neither have any of the other "regulars" that post here. After all, you got in. Ahhhhhhh...Yup. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Brain? Correct an error or admit being wrong...??? He'll hit the Powerball before that happens, and we all know the chances of THAT happening... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. Small world. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Dave K8MN Would you like me to? |
Subject: K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer
From: (William) Date: 10/14/2004 3:21 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. Small world. Not so small world. I note that K8MN is well known in numerous forums and "communities" within Amateur Radio. I do NOT see N0IMD anywhere but here. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Would you like me to? Are you CAPABLE of it? Steve, K4YZ |
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. I certainly did, but I'm not the individual who made the peculiar, unrelated statement here. That was you alone. Small world. No, actually it is the same size as it has always been. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Would you like me to? It'd only be fair since Dan made no statement about morse testing keeping out "riff-raff", "William". Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. I certainly did, but I'm not the individual who made the peculiar, unrelated statement here. That was you alone. Small world. No, actually it is the same size as it has always been. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Would you like me to? It'd only be fair since Dan made no statement about morse testing keeping out "riff-raff", "William". Dave K8MN "David," the "riff-raff" argument is an old one engaged in by the PCTA. Am I "alone" not allowed to have a "memory?" |
Subject: K1MAN is nothing but a QRMer
From: (William) Date: 10/15/2004 8:46 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. I certainly did, but I'm not the individual who made the peculiar, unrelated statement here. That was you alone. Small world. No, actually it is the same size as it has always been. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Would you like me to? It'd only be fair since Dan made no statement about morse testing keeping out "riff-raff", "William". Dave K8MN "David," the "riff-raff" argument is an old one engaged in by the PCTA. Am I "alone" not allowed to have a "memory?" Oh, you HAVE a memory, Brain. You just allow it to be selective in what you "remember". Of course when someone else does the same thing, you are all over them like white on rice. But of course the "PCTA" is the only one's who have a "double standard".......... Steve, K4YZ |
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. I certainly did, but I'm not the individual who made the peculiar, unrelated statement here. That was you alone. Small world. No, actually it is the same size as it has always been. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Would you like me to? It'd only be fair since Dan made no statement about morse testing keeping out "riff-raff", "William". "David," the "riff-raff" argument is an old one engaged in by the PCTA. Am I "alone" not allowed to have a "memory?" Would you like me to re-post what Dan wrote and what you replied? Your memory must be fairly short if you can't recall that. It was only a few short days ago. Dan's comments had nothing to do with keeping riff-raff out of amateur radio. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. I certainly did, but I'm not the individual who made the peculiar, unrelated statement here. That was you alone. Small world. No, actually it is the same size as it has always been. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Would you like me to? It'd only be fair since Dan made no statement about morse testing keeping out "riff-raff", "William". "David," the "riff-raff" argument is an old one engaged in by the PCTA. Am I "alone" not allowed to have a "memory?" Would you like me to re-post what Dan wrote and what you replied? Your memory must be fairly short if you can't recall that. It was only a few short days ago. Dan's comments had nothing to do with keeping riff-raff out of amateur radio. Dave K8MN "David," you have my permission to repost whatever you like. Thanks for caring. bb |
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: It is one of the Morse Myths that the "Morse Code Test Keeps Out The Riff-Raff." Oh? You're introducing something new? I've never subscribed to any such statement. After all, you got in. I note that you got in as well. I certainly did, but I'm not the individual who made the peculiar, unrelated statement here. That was you alone. Small world. No, actually it is the same size as it has always been. I note that you call this statement a "morse myth" and not a "battle cry". Would you like to reconsider or reframe your statement? Would you like me to? It'd only be fair since Dan made no statement about morse testing keeping out "riff-raff", "William". "David," the "riff-raff" argument is an old one engaged in by the PCTA. Am I "alone" not allowed to have a "memory?" Would you like me to re-post what Dan wrote and what you replied? Your memory must be fairly short if you can't recall that. It was only a few short days ago. Dan's comments had nothing to do with keeping riff-raff out of amateur radio. "David," you have my permission to repost whatever you like. Thanks for caring. I'm happy to be able to help you on this one, "William". Dan's statement was: "As in front of the FCC? Most certainly. I never said being CW tested makes you have any sense." You replied: "But that used to be one of the battle-cries for the PCTA." I'm all for reviving that old PCTA battle-cry, "Most Certainly!" Sheesh. Dave K8MN |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com