Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "KØHB"
writes: "Len Over 21" wrote None of that elaborate U.S. subdivision would be possible without the modern frequency synthesizers .... Wrong again, kind elderly Sir.. "modern frequency synthesizers" first appeared in amateur radio equipment in the 80's, a couple of decades after the imposition of "elaborate U.S. sub-division" in 1968. Sunuvagun! de Hans, K0HB uh-oh, Hans, now you've done it...... You've used historical fact to prove that Lenover21 is mistaken about something. I'll 'draw fire' with some more historical facts: - Hams were responsible for and successful at staying inside their allocated bands and subbands (phone-image vs. cw-data) long before 1968 or "modern frequency synthesizers". - The concept of "subbands by license class" was proposed no later than 1964 and accepted in principle by FCC no later than 1965 - without "modern frequency synthesizers". - Some HF ham band and subband edges are/were not multiples of 100 kHz (top end of 20 and 15, for example, or the edges of the old 11 meter amateur band). Many have been that way since long before 1968 or "modern frequency synthesizers". - With the exceptions of beacon and repeater operation, hams are not required by regulation to operate on specific spot frequencies or channels. Nor are they required to know their precise operating frequency other than that it is inside the allocated band or subband. Nor are they required to use "modern frequency synthesizers" or crystal control. - Inexpensive, stable, precise, accurate self-controlled variable frequency oscillators have been available for hams to build or buy since long before 1968. - The concept of "subbands by license class" is intended to reward the passing of more-advanced written tests. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy |