| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dee D. Flint wrote:
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: I tend to think that a single class of licence would be a good idea, although many people argue that there should also be a beginner's licence, and I am not totally opposed to that. I don't see a genuine need for more than two licences, though. Then what you'd want, ideally, is a single class of license whose written test would at least be equivalent to the current written requirements for Extra - all in one go. It would also need to include those elements from the Tech and General tests that are not repeated in the Extra class test. Need? I doubt that the one classer's want the test level at the Extra level to begin with, and might go apoplectic if the Tech and General tests were included! - Mike KB3EIA - |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| 1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
| My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
| Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
| Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy | |||