Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ...
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: I tend to think that a single class of licence would be a good idea, although many people argue that there should also be a beginner's licence, and I am not totally opposed to that. I don't see a genuine need for more than two licences, though. Then what you'd want, ideally, is a single class of license whose written test would at least be equivalent to the current written requirements for Extra - all in one go. It would also need to include those elements from the Tech and General tests that are not repeated in the Extra class test. Right you are, Dee. That would mean an exam of at least 100 questions, allowing for overlap and the simplification of some rules. And the prospective ham would have to pass it all in one shot. Would that *really* be optimum for the ARS? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy |