Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
Dee D. Flint wrote: "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: I tend to think that a single class of licence would be a good idea, although many people argue that there should also be a beginner's licence, and I am not totally opposed to that. I don't see a genuine need for more than two licences, though. Then what you'd want, ideally, is a single class of license whose written test would at least be equivalent to the current written requirements for Extra - all in one go. It would also need to include those elements from the Tech and General tests that are not repeated in the Extra class test. Need? I doubt that the one classer's want the test level at the Extra level to begin with, and might go apoplectic if the Tech and General tests were included! Then they're asking for wholesale downgrading of the written testing standards. Bad idea. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy |