Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: "Alun" wrote in message .. . [snip] I tend to think that a single class of licence would be a good idea, although many people argue that there should also be a beginner's licence, and I am not totally opposed to that. I don't see a genuine need for more than two licences, though. Also, I don't think subband restrictions by licence class make any sense whatsoever, as the propagation is the same for the whole band. It's not a matter of propagation. It's simply that band restrictions are far easier to enforce. With a quick lookup of the call sign, you can tell if the operator is staying within his privileges. Exactly! Ideally, I would give an entry level licence very restricted power on the whole extent of a limited number of bands in different parts of the spectrum. Needless to say, I wouldn't have a code test for any licence. The problem would be the transition from the present situation to such a scheme. The vested interests of those currently licenced probably make this idea impracticable. Enforcement issues make this idea impractical not the "vested interests" of those already licensed. It is impossible to determine if a person is staying within his/her power restrictions unless you are right next to the transmitter to make measurements. I've worked QRP stations that nearly pegged my meter and other times could not pull a kilowatt station out of the mud. And the vagaries of antenna installation make it even less clear. I'd rather have QRP and an excellent antenna than high power and a mediocre one. Power limits would rely solely on the honor system. This has worked reasonably well so far for two reasons: 1) the majority of hams are decent people and 2) the basic radio comes out of the box with 100 watts, which works reasonably well so there is not a lot of temptation to hook up an amplifier and work illegally. Also, amplifiers are fairly expensive, and the dBs per dollar can be steep. However you say "very restricted power". I'm assuming that you mean something substantially less than today. So then you would have a situation where the beginner has purchased a radio that significantly exceeds his power privileges with no one being able to detect that he/she is exceeding those privileges if they choose to operate it at full power. That's exactly the situation in Japan. Or are you going to propose that they cannot purchase or own a radio that exceeds their power privileges?? This would be a very bad proposal. That would require mandating that hams show their licenses to purchase equipment. It would have to also be illegal for a non-ham to purchase such equipment even for a gift. It would be illegal for a beginner to purchase almost all used equipment on the market. He'd, by law, have to take the expensive, new equipment route. Unless he/she bought used QRP stuff. On top of that is the fact that a newcomer couldn't buy a transceiver until the license was earned. So how is a newbie supposed to get a hands-on feel for the ham bands? In the bad old days of separate rx/tx, it was common for a would be ham to buy or build a receiver and become familiar with ham radio before getting a license. That's how many of us learned the code, too. Still a good idea, only now the new ham now gets a transceiver in most cases. "No gear without a license" would end that. Or the manufacturers might respond with cheap, low quality equipment that would be unsuitable to connect to an amplifier (once the beginner upgraded) as it would have the same problems as amplified CBs do now. There may even be other ramifications of "very limited power" privileges. New operator + compromise antenna + very low power = frustration. It is far better to select easily enforced requirements (i.e. band limits) than items that are not easily enforced or items that require creating an entire hierarchy of new regulations to support it. Yep. Most of the rewards and privileges we get in life often have little relationship to what we did to get them. Just look at our jobs. In the case of subbands-by-license-class, there's another angle. The restricted parts of the bands are usually less crowded. And they're where the DX often hangs out, and where the contest overflow goes first. So they're "prime real estate". 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy |