Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() KØHB wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote Need? I doubt that the one classer's want the test level at the Extra level to begin with, and might go apoplectic if the Tech and General tests were included! My proposal to FCC asks for a one-term, privilege-rich beginners permit, and a "full-privilege" standard license with an exam including the material currently covered on the Tech/General/Extra written examinations. Current licensees could continue to renew in their existing class, or upgrade to the new "standard" license class. Two classes there. I do like your full privelige license, but we've had the discussions about the learners permit that I'm uncomfortable with. It beats the bejabbers out of the NCVEC proposal tho'! - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy |