| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#2
October 3rd 04, 11:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Kellie is going to name- and number-drop (once he refreshes his memory on old advertisements) that HIS gear is "the best" and "superior" and anything that an NCTA has is "crap." HIS "engineering examples" all involve machinery things, never electronic stuff. Must be difficult for those who "sit at captain's tables" to regress and crack open a theory book, huh? How about just being a good appliance OP and opening an operations manual or TO? He can't even get the power supply voltage correct. Wonder how many radios he's fried over the years? "Stir-fry" as the napalm unloaders were wont to call it... :-) Lots of defoliant in here, too. We can't complain about that because the PCTA are royalty and thus above reproach...but I complain anyway since I know that electrons, fields, and waves don't much give a snit which radio service it is or how the modulation is made. Can't convince the PCTA of that. Color them inviolate. Done. Ooops! Here comes the flying bricks. Incoming! Incoming! :-) Another hostile action. See how easy they are? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| 1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
| My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
| Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
| Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
