Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ...
"William" wrote in message om... (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? From: (William) Date: 10/4/2004 7:14 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Gosh, I wonder who's running MARS? All of the civilians who happen to have Amateur Radio licenses, DoD runs MARS. For DoD purposes, not Amateur purposes. On MARS frequencies, not on Amateur frequencies. With DoD regulations, not Amateur regulations. Riley has nothing to do with it. Didn't say he did. You said that "MARS IS Amateur Radio!" Riley is a regulator of Amateur Radio. Therefore Riley is a regulator of MARS. Incorrect use of deductive logic. Otherwise we could say: Roses are red, Apples are red, therefore roses are apples. Except that not all roses are red, and not all apples are red. I ran Steve in circles with your logic. He then tried saying that -ALL- MARS radio operators were Amateur Radio volunteers. I showed that not all MARS radio operators are amateurs. Then he switched to "MARS would cease to exist without amateur volunteers," which is where his current state of the art thinking sits. Or we could go: Dogs are carnivores, bears are carnivores, therefore dogs are bears. Then why don't you? See if Steve will buy into it. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Best of luck. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
1960's incentive licensing proposal | Policy | |||
My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | General | |||
Why You Don't Like Warmed Over Incentive Licensing | Policy |