| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
October 1st 04, 05:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: Who are "Jimmie and Davie"? Perhaps Len meant "Jim, N2EY" and "Dave, K8MN". If so, then his use of feminized diminutives for our names proves (paraphrasing Brian, N0IMD): "he doesn't have the guts to spell our names right". Tsk. I'm only copying the style of some PCTA extras in here. Notably your mutual buddy, gunnery nurse yell-yell. Isn't it time you slapped his wrist with wet noodles again? Is this part of the civil discoarse lesson? I have designed, built, and operated at three amateur radio HF transceivers. First one was about 25 years ago. Before that, I was doing the same with separate receivers and transmitters. Right. JAMES was the designer of the mighty K2. Hi hi. Len wrote here in January 2000 that he was going for Extra right out of the box. He wasn't a ham then. Nor now. Tsk. I didn't lie down on the floor of the Church of St. Hiram and Take Vows For Life while forming a code key with my body. :-) So no one can take your word on a thing unless you've done something like that? :-) I'll try to remember that. But as you say, Dave, an author is someone who writes. I am the author of this post; therefore, I am an author. So are you. Tsk. You post. Posts hold fences. You make fences to keep out independent thought, limit those within to YOUR type of thinking. Hang on, Len. I want to get all of this part of your civil discoarse lesson for my notes. The point is the same: Numerous authors here have proved Len's assertions about subbands and synthesizers to be completely without basis in fact. Tsk. That's not a post. Your judgement is a post hole. I take it that you really can't defend your earlier statements. The end result is that you're reduced to answering with the nonsense above. The plain simple fact remains that Len has not had to deal with subbands-by-license-class in amateur radio. Or any other amateur-radio issues. His observations are those of a spectator only, not a participant. Tsk. Jimmie want to dismiss the FCC because the FCC does not require any commissioner or staff to hold amateur radio licenses? There are some things you just don't get no matter how many times the explanation is provided for you: The FCC staff gets paid to regulate and administer amateur radio in the U.S. They aren't spectators. We are participants. We're not spectators. You are neither a regulator nor a participant. Have you grasped the concept? Actually, I don't think Len invented *any* of the circuits or systems now used in "modern ready-built radios". Not any radios I know of, anyway. Tsk. Recycling old parts circa-1990 and using vacuum tubes is hardly "invention." :-) You walk a few steps and then you trip. It was written that YOU didn't invent any of the circuits or systems used in "modern ready-built" radios. He didn't claim that he invented the recycling of parts and vacuum tubes. You really need to pay attention. But, Jimmies qualification is the phrase "Not any radios I know of, anyway." That imperious declaration infers he is judge, jury, and supreme court of all "radio" that is meaningful anywhere, anytime. :-) I really have no trouble accepting that you believe that is what Jim's phrase meant. Dave K8MN |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| US Licensing Restructuring ??? When ??? | Policy | |||
| New ARRL Proposal | Policy | |||
| My restructuring proposal | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
