Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Phil Kane" wrote in
et: On 23 Nov 2004 13:07:17 GMT, Alun wrote: Arguably, the equal protection clause of the 14th amendment only applies to the states, but there are cases invoking the due process clause of the 5th amendment, which is applicable to the federal government. Do not forget that holding an amateur license does not convey any civil rights - _Howard v City of Burlingame_ I'm not sure what implications that has. I think I'd better try and find that case and read it. I've never actually researched any case law on ham radio. I already had other reasons to have looked up Yick Wo, etc. I beleive there was a Puerto Rican case in federal district court that relied on either the 5th or the 14th in the alternative, allowing aliens to become registered as professional engineers. I don't have the citation for that one. This is a little way off Phil Kane's speciality of communications law, Not really. I am also a Registered Professional Engineer (by exam, not waiver) and I have to keep up with such things. although no doubt the FCC can't discriminate against aliens. Maybe Phil knows of some case law regarding aliens and the FCC? We all know that an alien can unilaterally cause a change in FCC rules without a public hearing - JY1 and the Medical Code Waiver. Seriously, about 20 years ago The Congress amended Section 318 of the Comm Act - the section that required US citizenship to be allowed to hold an operator license. This was part of the Ronald Reagan privitization move to enable non-citizens to seek employment as radio broadcast DJs which at that time required a Radiotelephone Third Class Permit (or better). The citizenship requirement for an amateur operator license was swept away at the same time. I am not a lawyer, just an alien. I hope not as bad as some of the space-aliens who post here... -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane I think there has been a move generally away from requiring citizenship for ham radio licences. Very few countries do anymore. BTW, did you now that citizenship restrictions for lawyers were swept away by In Re Griffiths, which in turn relied on Yick Wo (Rehnquist dissented in Griffiths, on an officer of the court line of argument). My interest is that as a patent agent and an alien I can be disbarred for simply ceasing to reside in the US. This is not the case with any state bar. The difficulty in applying this line of authority (Griffiths and Yick Wo) is that the equal protection clause of the 14th is directed to the states, and the patent agent licence is federal. This is definitely getting a bit OT! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|