| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote ' Lucky you!! What is your setup if I may ask? I was only in a little while each evening and my antenna is not sufficient to hit a jackpot like that. I'm doing well if I work Iowa from here. Although I did hear Wyoming but he was hunting and pouncing darn it! IC-775DSP, AL-1200, Inverted "L". 73, de Hans, K0HB I've been thinking about trying to set one up. What's the details on yours (length of vertical section, length of horizontal section, height above ground, feedline, etc.)? Thanks, Dee |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote I've been thinking about trying to set one up. What's the details on yours (length of vertical section, length of horizontal section, height above ground, feedline, etc.)? My overall length is 158 feet. The vertical section is 65 feet, and the horizontal is 93. This is somewhat longer than the 'classic quarter' design, but seems to work better for me. Rather than think of it as a quarter wave antenna, I visualize it as a very short toploaded vertical. I feed with 50-ohm coax, and a small variable series matching capacitor (I think it's around 400-100pf). My counterpoise is 8 random length radials, plus four 10-foot copperclad ground rods. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote (I think it's around 400-100pf). Make that "400-1000pf" 73, de Hans, K0HB |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote in message k.net... "KØHB" wrote (I think it's around 400-100pf). Make that "400-1000pf" 73, de Hans, K0HB I tried that design for a few years myself Hans. And it did indeed work well. Then I decided to go with the classic 1/4 wave design. I really couldn't tell much, if any difference. Only advantage to the 1/4 wave design that I can see is the transmitter likes it better. Thus don't have to use a tuner or matching device. Dan/W4NTI |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|