Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: We're supposed to do as Len says, not as Len does. Y'all are? Well, heck, why not...you demand Obediance to the old standards and practices in a radio hobby...and have for years without going along with any change. No one here has gone along with any change in amateur radio? How did you come to be in possession of this rare informational gem? If the code test were eliminated, I wouldn't bother to be here. :-) It was reduced to 5 wpm. Your presence wasn't reduced by the same percentage. :-) :-) Code test good or code test bad, elimination of it will probably not bring anything to the ARS. Tsk. The only thing the code test requirement did was to form the ARS as the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society. :-) That seems to be a song sung by the Archaic Newsgroup Haunter. :-) Plus a lot of puerile nyah-nyahs from those who could do morse at high rate having playground glee at talking down to those who couldn't. :-) You really should see someone about that complex you have. :-) Putting aside your own personal hatred of a newsgroup opponent, you COULD have looked at the past history of the larger world of radio communications and - if at all possible (but unlikely in here) - dispassionately agreed with the larger world of radio. Personal hatred? I don't hate you, Len. In fact, I rather pity you. Archaic Radiotelegraphy Society is what you are in. Enjoy. That's incorrect. The Amateur Radio Service is what we're in. You aren't. Dave K8MN |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Problem for boaters and APRS? | Policy | |||
Problem for boaters and APRS? | General | |||
Problem for boaters and APRS? | Policy | |||
APRS Safety Question | Digital | |||
APRS Safety Question | Digital |