LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28   Report Post  
Old December 27th 04, 06:36 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ws.com, "Phil
Kane" writes:

I for one thank Phil for sharing the results of his vast experience and his
relationship with the FCC with us. If he didn't care, he would simply say
nothing...and we would remain ignorant.


I love to teach the subject.....


Good on you, Phil. My thanks also.

Question: Can you explain "sunshine" and "sunshine agenda" as
it is used by the FCC and shown in brilliant red notes on the ECFS
Comment listings?

[my Volume 1 of Title 47 is still at the office...]

I gather it has something to do with documents past a certain date
that the "staff is not supposed to consider." On the other hand,
specifically for Docket 04-37 on BPL, some documents are in public
view past any posted dates for same but no "sunshine" mention.

Thanks.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rules changes/enforcement at Dayton Hamvention [email protected] Boatanchors 4 January 23rd 05 11:42 PM
RILEY SAYS K1MAN BROADCASTS ARE LEGAL Dave Welby Policy 28 August 31st 04 01:59 AM
RILEY SAYS K1MAN BROADCASTS ARE LEGAL Dave Welby General 27 May 10th 04 11:30 PM
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules JJ General 159 August 12th 03 12:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017