| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: Jeffrey Herman wrote: robert casey wrote: Yes, and hams can handle that low priority stuff to offload the more important communications links. "I took care of the mundane boring stuff so the heroes could save the lives"... Our last hurricane (1992) was a direct hit upon the island of Kauai. All normal comms between Kauai County and the rest of the state were wiped out. The ONLY comms between the governor here in Honolulu and the mayor of Kauai was via amateur radio. Not only H&W traffic was passed, but more importantly, safety of life traffic, too. Amateur radio is part of each county's emergency plan to the point where ham stations are set up in each police and fire station. Licensing exams are given regularly to police and firemen. Also, every hospital has a station. The state thinks so highly of amateur radio that our statewide repeater system rides on the state-owned microwave backbone which connects each county (island). So, when normal communications go down, all the counties (islands) of state are neatly tied together via ham radio. And yet that seems so hard for some peope to grasp. Tsk. Some grasp at straws. Especially the strawmen. First of all, a search fails to turn up ANY evidence that "all normal comms" were disabled on any island of Hawaii in 1992. Note: That search includes the words 'normal communications.' Searching on the Hawaii state government web information turns up thousands of interesting bits of information on Hawaii, its police and fire departments (some quite detailed, nice photos, etc.), laws in process, various agencies, school system, and so forth. So much so that it became unproductive to check out each search hit to verify the items of Lecturer Herman's statements. There is NO mention found that "policemen and firemen" are all given examinations IN amateur radio nor that amateur radio equipment is set up in each police and fire station. If that were so widespread as claimed, then each department would have featured that on their web pages, included it in law proceeding remarks/comments, and so forth. There's nothing from the Administration side of Hawaii government to indicate that happening. Not all hospitals are available on the web but the statement that "ALL hospitals have ham stations" is a bit over the top. I'm open to some evidence other than the usual RACES propaganda to verify any of this "university lecturer's" claims. The state of Hawaii is not a small one; it is important, a focus point for our Asian neighbors in the Pacific. Hawaii is generally considered "remote" by mainlanders and therefore those who wish to embellish a few truths seem to think they can get away with it, of not being checked out. Like some other fraternal order propaganda, telling folks what they want to hear will dissuade them from finding out it it is truth or not. The state of Hawaii has an Interstate Highway System. It is fudging the truth a bit to claim one can drive that system to any other state...without another means to span part of the Pacific Ocean. I would suppose that a junior college instructor could call themselves a "part of the University of Hawaii system" and that they "lecture on mathematics" if they hold classes under that instructor. But, the same "mathematics lecturer" (on the scale of Roger Penrose?) once claimed that the ARRL Amateur's Handbook was on a "bestseller" listing in the USA...and the American Bookseller's Association (ABA) couldn't verify that at all. :-) Folks, we are getting into a huge embellishment project here with all these straw structures. In other venues it would be called LYING. In here it is apparently an Orwellian kind of Newspeak. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Len Over 21 wrote: Folks, we are getting into a huge embellishment project here with all these straw structures. In other venues it would be called LYING. In here it is apparently an Orwellian kind of Newspeak. The ONLY thing "Orwellian" here is the idea that YOU represent any kind of honest, trustworthy or otherwise reputable point of view. There's a LIAR here, alright, and it's Leonard H. Anderson. His mistruths and deceit are well documented in Google. I'll give you this, Lennie...For a putz that routinely "embellished" his Army "career" with the sacrifices made by soldiers who died 3 years before you were ever inducted, you certainly have some huge cajones accusing others of "embellishment". Face it, Lennie...As long as you continue to lie, deceive and misrepresent the facts, you will have your nose rubbed in your misdeeds in this forum. You are not honest. You are not trustworthy. And THAT'S a fact. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Len Over 21 wrote:
The state of Hawaii has an Interstate Highway System. It is fudging the truth a bit to claim one can drive that system to any other state...without another means to span part of the Pacific Ocean. It's paid for with federal funds, thus it's part of the federal interstate highway system. It's no different from Interstate 405 in California: It begins in LA and ends in San Diego -- it never leaves the state yet it's yet it's still an "interstate." I would suppose that a junior college instructor could call themselves a "part of the University of Hawaii system" and that they "lecture on mathematics" if they hold classes under that instructor. The semester begin tomorrow -- I'll be teaching a calculus class at the university campus (which is not a "junior college"), 8:30-9:20 MWF, Keller Hall room 403. The class is full but I'll let you register, if you think you can handle the class. But, the same "mathematics lecturer" (on the scale of Roger Penrose?) once claimed that the ARRL Amateur's Handbook was on a "bestseller" listing in the USA...and the American Bookseller's Association (ABA) couldn't verify that at all. :-) Go back and read my complete post, paying attention to the phrase "...technical best seller." Folks, we are getting into a huge embellishment project here with all these straw structures. In other venues it would be called LYING. In here it is apparently an Orwellian kind of Newspeak. Accusing me of lying? Are you sure you want to commit libel? No 73 for you, Jeff KH6O -- Chief Petty Officer, U.S. Coast Guard Mathematics Lecturer, University of Hawaii System |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jeffrey Herman" wrote in message ... : : Accusing me of lying? Are you sure you want to commit libel? : According to Funk et Wagnall's, something about "grossly unflattering utterance". OK I can commit that. Watch this. JEFFREY IS AN IDIOT! Now all the idiots will sue me for libel. Barnabus Grumwitch Overbyte sends |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (Jeffrey Herman) writes: It's paid for with federal funds, thus it's part of the federal interstate highway system. It's no different from Interstate 405 in California: It begins in LA and ends in San Diego -- it never leaves the state yet it's yet it's still an "interstate." Ooooo...going to lecture me about my local geography? :-) Well, you didn't seem to know about how how things worked. Try Interstate FIVE as an illustration...begins at the Canadian border goes all the way south through Washington, Oregon, California, ends at the Mexican border. Over a kilomile long, takes two days to drive at lawful speeds. Been there, done that, many times. The point was about a part of the Interstate highway system which never leaves a particular state. Gee, if I wanted a LECTURE on highways, I'd go to the AAA website of my local auto club office...they give out free maps to us members. You don't want to get one; you want to give one. Go for it! "TECHNICAL" best seller! What year? And who was the compiler of that gem of information? [was it a bookstore in Newington?] You might try the ABA or some other book industry associations first to verify some nonsense claim. Or take off your blinders. Whichever is easiest. Do you have any information to the contrary, Leonard, or are you just blowing smoke? I've only been USING technical books since 1960 and my first job assignment as an electronics engineer responsible for new design. To quote you, "Why must you always live in the past"? The Green Bible, the Blue Bible, Millman & Taub, Henney, Petersen and Weldon, Floyd Gardner, lots of names which are very familiar in my small 30+ foot total length personal bookshelf right above the immediate computer desk here. Since I already write for money and know several authors (who work at that full time) plus book store owners-managers, I have some acquaintenceship with the professional book associations. Now, if you wish to LECTURE me on "best sellers" of anything, I will invite you to pass gas on a shuttle flight ("go take a flying fart") between islands. So because you have a shelf full of books and since you've written for money, Jeffrey's claim can't possibly be true. Does that sum it up? I am happy to hear that you have a personal bookshelf though. Dave K8MN |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave Heil" wrote in message
... Len Over 21 wrote: In article , (Jeffrey Herman) writes: It's paid for with federal funds, thus it's part of the federal interstate highway system. It's no different from Interstate 405 in California: It begins in LA and ends in San Diego -- it never leaves the state yet it's yet it's still an "interstate." Ooooo...going to lecture me about my local geography? :-) Well, you didn't seem to know about how how things worked. I think there's a difference in highways; as in "intrastate" and "interstate." I believe it's intrastate if it stays inside the boundary of a state and "interstate" if it goes outside the boundary of a state. Kim W5TIT |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think there's a difference in highways; as in "intrastate" and "interstate." I believe it's intrastate if it stays inside the boundary of a state and "interstate" if it goes outside the boundary of a state. Kim W5TIT It's more to do with who funded the construction of what highway. The Interstates were federally funded (about 90%, 10% by the state that whatever interstate highway is in). Before the Interstates were built, long distance driving was a real PITA. That the Dept of Defense partially funded the Interstates so they would be able to get convoys of troops and stuff to somewhere. Intersections with local roads were designed so if a bridge was bombed, traffic could still get thru (go on the off ramp and then across the local road and back on on the on ramp). Railroads worked well in WWII, but our mainland for the most part wasn't bombed. Take out a railroad bridge and things get bottled up for a while. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
robert casey wrote: Before the Interstates were built, long distance driving was a real PITA. So I've been told. That the Dept of Defense partially funded the Interstates so they would be able to get convoys of troops and stuff to somewhere. Intersections with local roads were designed so if a bridge was bombed, traffic could still get thru (go on the off ramp and then across the local road and back on on the on ramp). Whole bunch of factors involved, like the Autobahns in Germany and the success of toll roads like the Pennsylvania Turnpike. Eisenhower was a big proponent of the interstate highway system. There was also the concerted effort of the automakers, oil and rubber companies, and even the concrete industry to get more Americans to own and drive cars and trucks. They went so far as to intentionally buy up and destroy transit systems (such as the Pacific Electric in the Los Angeles area) so that people would drive cars. Railroads worked well in WWII, but our mainland for the most part wasn't bombed. Take out a railroad bridge and things get bottled up for a while. Bombing bridges, particularly narrow ones like most RR spans, is singularly difficult without special weapons. Highway bridges are at least as vulnerable as RR bridges to such attacks. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| No anticipated change in Morse Requirement for a while | Policy | |||
| BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK | Policy | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||