LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25   Report Post  
Old January 16th 05, 10:52 PM
Len Over 21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , (Jeffrey Herman)
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:
The state of Hawaii has an Interstate Highway System. It is fudging the
truth a bit to claim one can drive that system to any other

state...without
another means to span part of the Pacific Ocean.


It's paid for with federal funds, thus it's part of the federal interstate
highway system. It's no different from Interstate 405 in California: It
begins in LA and ends in San Diego -- it never leaves the state yet it's
yet it's still an "interstate."


Wow! Is that a "requirement of radio knowledge" to be a "superior'
radio amateur?

Is there a "WAI" (Worked All Interstates) for mobile hams?

I would suppose that a junior college instructor could call themselves
a "part of the University of
Hawaii system" and that they "lecture on mathematics" if they hold
classes under that instructor.


The semester begin tomorrow -- I'll be teaching a calculus class at the
university campus (which is not a "junior college"), 8:30-9:20 MWF,
Keller Hall room 403. The class is full but I'll let you register,
if you think you can handle the class.


Me handle your class? Why should I do that?

Can't you handle it all by yourself? Tsk.

But, the same "mathematics lecturer"
(on the scale of Roger Penrose?) once claimed that the ARRL Amateur's
Handbook was on a "bestseller" listing in the USA...and the American
Bookseller's Association (ABA) couldn't verify that at all. :-)


Go back and read my complete post, paying attention to the phrase
"...technical best seller."


Tsk, tsk, tsk. YOU go back and point at the date and place
it was stated that the ARRL Handbook became a "technical
best seller." [sorry, the ARRL press releases, advertisements,
etc. do NOT count]


Accusing me of lying? Are you sure you want to commit libel?


In here? :-)

Heavens no. In here the PCTA extras redefine words and the
radio world and everything else into their own little fantasyland
desires. They are the "superiors."

"Libel" in here means to say bad things about morsemanship
and say bad things like trying to eliminate the amateur radio
license morse code test. In ANY OTHER NEWSGROUP you
would be guilty of lying. Not here. :-)


BTW, have you worked out the little problem in synchronizing
oscillator frequencies yet? Remember that numbers don't do
the RF generation. Real hardware does.



Posted 16 Jan 05


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No anticipated change in Morse Requirement for a while Len Over 21 Policy 16 January 20th 05 12:18 PM
BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK Steve Robeson K4CAP Policy 0 October 21st 04 10:38 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 04:45 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017