| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Phil Kane" wrote in message ganews.com... : : You are telling me "NO" when I was the one who prepared all the : paperwork for the Dunifer case, read every filing, and sat at the : table for each and every hearing? : : What planet are you living on, fella? That was MY case. : OM Phil, Attached find a sample of his work from his new "blog" page. Do you wonder why his applications are not viewed with favor? Ciao! -- "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." - Voltaire -- Following from his "blog" ---- enjoy! Written by Todd Daugherty N9OGL On February 8, 2002 the United States Court of Appeal ruled the Radio Broadcast Preservation Act (RBPA-2000) was unconstitutional (Greg Ruggiero vs. FCC 2002) then to a shock the court of appeals overturned it's own decision ruling that the RBPA of 2000 was constitutional. (Greg Ruggiero Vs FCC 2003). I'm writing this "paper" because I feel that there was something that should have been said but wasn't and since I tell it as it is I will say it. There is also a problem with the recent ruling (Greg Ruggiero Vs FCC 2003) which I've also added to this paper. The first comes from that Bitch Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson who stated in the 2002 ruling "By contrast, the License restriction here applies to the entire class of those who as of the time of their license application have unlawfully engaged in LPFM broadcasting. Further the restriction substantially furthers the plain intent of the Congress which believed that "the operation of an unlicensed station demonstrates a lack of commitment to follow the basic rules and regulations which are essential to having a broadcast service that serves the public, and those individuals or groups should not be permitted to receive a licenses in the LPFM service." H.R. Rep. No. 506 at 8 (2000). What could be more reasonable or logical than to suspect that those who ignored the commission LPFM broadcast regulation in the past are likely to do so in the future and therefore to head them off." First, you must not have to be very intelligent to be a ****ing judge of the court of appeal.it seems if they can let this dumb ass bitch and her little bitch whore buddies on the bench then anyone can.. "What could be more reasonable or logical than to suspect that those who ignored the commission LPFM broadcast regulation in the past are likely to do so in the future and therefore to head them off." Did I ****ing miss something here??? Listen bitch the FCC NEVER had any LPFM rules prior to the passing of the LPFM rules in 1999. You and your ****ing whores in the Court of Appeal are the stupidest mother ****ers on the planet. For years the FCC went around telling you that all a person had to do was fill out an application and ask for a waiver..well guest what you ****ing sluts THE FCC ****ING LIED TO YOU!!! The FCC has NEVER considered application and waiver for LPFM ..and you stupid ****s believed them all these years. That's why a lot of people went on the air..because the FCC wouldn't consider applications and waivers for a low power service. Bitch my group applied six times for a license with waiver and that is why we went pirate.because the FCC wouldn't even consider are application or are waiver for a community with no service..and by the way bitch.the two congressman who wrote that bill and were the chief sponsor of the RBPA of 2000 are no longer in congress because they were voted out by the people of their state because of that ****. And now.2003 for the king bitch whore Ginsburg. "In 1999 the Commission proposed to modify its low-power Radio rules and sought public comment upon whether it should "create two classes of low power radio service, both of which would operate in the existing FM radio band: a 1000- watt primary service and a 100-watt secondary service." Id. at p 1. The Commission also sought comment upon whether it should establish "a third, 'microradio' class of low power radio service that would operate in the range of 1 to 10 watts." Id. at p 1." The commission proposed?? That's a bunch of **** the FCC didn't propose it someone else did in a Petition for Rulemaking.that's a bunch of ****ing **** quit smoking your ****ing crack. "The Congress ultimately responded to the Commission's decision by enacting the Radio Broadcast Preservation Act of 2000 (RBPA), Pub. L. No. 106-553, 114 Stat. 2762, s 632," The Congress responded not out of concern of what the FCC was doing but by the huge load of cash they were getting from the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB). My dickhead congressman John ****less (Shinkus) Got paid $14,000 from the NAB for the RBPA but that's ok..I'm going make sure that son of bitch mother ****er isn't elected again! " We reject also Ruggiero's claim that the character qualification is overinclusive because it prohibits all pirates, including those good pirates who stopped broadcasting illegally when ordered to do so, and those "former pirates [who] subsequently have become model citizens," from obtaining a license. All unlicensed LPFM broadcasters violated the Communications Act. Any unlicensed broadcasting demonstrates a willful disregard of the most basic rule of federal broadcasting regulation." Then perhaps " former pirates" like WBCQ shouldn't have a license..and tell me you stupid ****...when did the disregard to the legal process become legal..You stupid **** head has basically given the FCC the go ahead to disregard not only the judiciary process but the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Your stupid thinking is regardless to what a federal judge or an administrative judge says a pirate is a pirate regardless to what legal challenge they may bring and regardless of any fact or findings. Your ****ing retarded thinking is that a pirate is guilty regardless of any evidence.well ****, why do we do that with murders..Hell, Bob Butt much killed Joe Dickless but hey there's evidence he not guilty.**** he's guilty regardless of any evidence. That the same ****ing **** you did with pirates then it should apply to any other crime. Perhaps Mr. Ginsburg you should stop kissing congress and the federal government ass. And now a few words from my favorite dickhead.Judge Randolph. "There is in short no chilling effect and Ruggiero therefore cannot invoke the overbreadth doctrine." This has to be one of the stupidest mother ****er on the planet...No chilling effect??? How about the ability to allow an agency to disregard any legal proceeding as prescribed under the APA not to mention your next stupid ****s comment.. "No one has a First Amendment right to a license," Red Lion Broad. Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367, 389 (1969), and it follows that no one has a First Amendment right to apply for a license." Then why apply??? If no one has a "right" as you put it to apply for a license then why have a licensing system?? Just like the **** stupid ******* you are; you've created one of the biggest loopholes a pirate would love! Because like you said no one has a right to apply for a license..thus, a person really shouldn't have to apply since there is no right. Despite what you and your little bitch whore buddies in the NAB may think as the secretary of commerce Herbert Hoover once stated The First Amendment and radio fall hand in hand..and it stupid ****s like you in the court of appeal that are destroying not only free speech but destroying the legal process. As for the U.S. Supreme Court..there just as **** stupid as these ****ing idiots..you know at one time I had great respect for the U.S. Supreme Court. But now..by allowing this stupid ****s to destroy the legal process and basically misread Red Lion Broadcasting and bend it to their own ****ing will I think the U.S. Supreme Court has got to **** hell and my respect is now gone. Because they along with those stupid **** in the U.S. Court of Appeal has failed to grasp reality of what is really go on in the world. Todd Daugherty Taylorville, Illinois December 2003 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|