Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Leo wrote: The following bulletin was sent out today by the Radio Amateurs of Canada HQ: Great stuff, Leo! Thanks for posting it. After following the link and reading, I see a couple of interesting points: 1) The expressed support for reduction of code testing in Canada is overwhelming. A clear mandate from those who commented. 2) The proposal, if I understand it correctly, does not completely eliminate Morse Code testing. Instead, it offers alternative ways of getting a license, with or without a code test. 3) The comment period was only 60 days long, and only about 150 people (mostly already-licensed amateurs, I think) commented. --- It's interesting to note that the various code test reduction/elimination proposals here in the USA have had a very different response. 73 de Jim, N2EY Industry Canada has analyzed the responses to the public consultation called under Canada Gazette Notice DGRB-003-04. A summary of the comments received and the individual replies are now available on the Industry Canada web site at http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/inter.../sf08280e.html. Amateurs should note that while the responses heavily favoured deletion of the Morse Qualification as a requirement for access to the HF bands, Industry Canada still has to make and announce a decision on Morse retention or deletion. Until a decision to delete Morse is announced, amateurs who do not hold the Morse Qualification may not operate on the HF bands below 30 MHz. It's almost over up here now - decision time is just around the corner! 73, Leo |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who are the FISTS members on RRAP? | Policy | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB |