Phil Kane wrote:
On 26 Jan 2005 15:56:02 -0800, K4YZ wrote:

So...you classify "extension courses" as "correspondence
courses"
still? You think a Masters Degree is that easy to obtain?
Tsk.

An "extension course" IS a "correspondence course".

Here's where I have to rain on your parade, Steve.

My first year of grad study at UCLA was in "UCLA extension" status
to avoid very high non-resident tuition. These classes were the
same ones that "regular" status students took. The next year I was
a California resident so I could register for "regular" classes.
When
I had completed all my course work ("matriculation" status) I could
petition for conversion of "extension" credits to "regular"
credits.

Another type of "extension" courses were those taught off-campus,
either at another institution's or at some company's campus.

AFAIK UCLA never had correspondence courses. I wish that they had.
I was enrolled in my last required course when I had to leave the
area because of job transfer.

I don't know whether they still have that "extension" system.

Phil, where did you think you were raining on anything?

Where were we discussing UCLA?
What is the price of tea in China?

73

Steve, K4YZ