LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old February 4th 05, 12:24 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

N2EY wrote:

In article ws.com, "Phil
Kane" writes:


On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 04:13:16 GMT, Doug McLaren wrote:


But to retort --

1) The FCC doesn't administer ham radio tests any more

Nothing in the Rules says that someone can't be called into an FCC
office and administered an individual test if the FCC deems it
necessary.



Bring 'em on! ;-)

2) The tests are generally receiving, not sending, and

Generally but not always. It's up to the examiner.


Yep. It is possible to pass Element 1 by *sending only*.



Can a person request to be tested by sending?


It is my understanding that such a test can be administered as an accomodation.
Same as someone might request a flashing light rather than audio tone, or a
pitch other than the usual 750 Hz.

My sending has always
outpaced my receiving!

Mine too.

73 de Jim, N2EY

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 02:49 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017