Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ws.com,
"Phil Kane" wrote: .... If it's who I think it is - someone who had a history of deciding what other hams "needed" - he was a traffic handler and contester who knew code very well. In that era the only FCC field folks who were not required to be Morse-qualified were the clerical staff. If I recall correctly the lady that did my test was a member of the clerical staff. From the above, has there been a change in the CW requirement for field staff? I know when I was offered a Field Engineer job they were happy I would not have to study CW (I turned it down, the idea of paying my moving and transfer expenses rankled me) -- -------------------------------------------------------- Personal e-mail is the n7bsn but at amsat.org This posting address is a spam-trap and seldom read RV and Camping FAQ can be found at http://www.ralphandellen.us/rv |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |