Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Feb 2005 08:13:22 -0800, Ralph E Lindberg wrote:
From the above, has there been a change in the CW requirement for field staff? I know when I was offered a Field Engineer job they were happy I would not have to study CW (I turned it down, the idea of paying my moving and transfer expenses rankled me) AFAIK the "technical agents" (used to be called engineers or technicians) still have to qualify at a minimum of 20 wpm text and 16 wpm code groups. The non-technical agents (used to be called Public Contact Specialists) and the clerical staff do not have to be code-qualified although I know several who are code-qualified from being licensed ham operators or once were monitoring station technicians. As far as relocation - when I hired on in 1967 they paid my transportation and moving expenses cross-country. It may have changed by the time that you were contacted. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |