RadioBanter - Len's terms of endearments list

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)

- Policy (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/)

- - Len's terms of endearments list (https://www.radiobanter.com/policy/63782-re-lens-terms-endearments-list.html)

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy
that I sent mail to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him and
disucssed
it in open forum dispite having been told the material was
sensitive.

Poor Stebe. Thought he could get away with some bragging. :-)

"Sensitive info." That's terminology of the DoD in regards
to information that is not discussed in public. So...it is "okay"
to mention some vague generalities of claimed military
experience but the "details are sensitive!" :-)

In other words, no hostile actions.

In other words, you're wrong.

Tsk, tsk. "In other words," Stebe was just plain LYING. :-)

Steve, you're right as always. ""People who make up stories
about
thier careers shouldn't give the
names of places and dates when those bits of information can be
corroborated." - Steve Robeson"

We're back to it Brian...last chance to suck it up and keep
things
gentlemanly.....

Tsk, tsk. Things "suck" on agreeing with Steve. :-)

Poor Stebe. He fantasizes his opponents as all being wrong,
all lying, all unlawful.

Somethings wrong with that guy. But I'd still like to hear his 7
adventure stories. Maybe over beers at the American Legion.

I wonder why he ever shot off his mouth about "seven hostile actions"
if he is so adamant about not talking about it?

Well, Brian, you and me and everyone else reading in here know
that Stebe left the safety off and shot out that brag statement. He
can't admit to being wrong (ever) for fear of losing his self esteem
(in his own eyes) so he keeps pressing and pressing and pressing
on his alleged "rightness" of that claim.

If and only if those "seven hostile actions" were really
"sensitive,"
then he should NOT have admitted any such thing under the DoD
information release guidelines. Just admitting he "took part" in
some
"sensitive" activity is a direct violation of policy.

In all probability, he never took part in any "sensitive" hostile
actions
that he "cannot talk about." He is just making up stories. LYING.

In his latest reply to the quoted above exchanges, he tries to
misdirect
the thread into his charges of your "unlawful operation" on amateur
bands while serving in the USAF in a foreign country. Stebe has NO
authority of any kind to "charge" you with anything in that regard.
If
he had, then he should have contacted the Judge Advocate General
office of the USAF and lodged a formal complaint...which would be
ridiculous since he has NO evidence of any wrongdoing by you. He
did not. Had he done so, he would have been laughed at (a terrible
no-no to him).

But, "face" is everything to him, it seems. He must keep up his
ruff and tuff behavior to prove he is "superior" and therefore will
never
ever admit to wrongdoing of HIS claims. It is always the OTHER
person who "did wrong." :-)

In one way, it is quite funny that he keeps on trying to claim such
"hostile action" experience without any evidence of his
participation.
It gets more hilarious when he says (in another posting) that "it
has
nothing to do with amateur radio!" Tsk, tsk, if it has nothing to
do
with amateur radio, why does he keep posting on that in here? :-)

He ought to just "suck it up" and forget about it. :-)

Well, back to "amateur radio subjects" about discussions of national
economy, national politics, and retirement plans. A valid amateur
radio license must be held to access the newsgroup? :-)

The ham Chat Room is picking up steam...

wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

I once slipped up and thought I could trust a guy
that I sent mail to in confidence, however he took stuff I sent him
and
disucssed
it in open forum dispite having been told the material
was
sensitive.

Poor Stebe. Thought he could get away with some bragging. :-)

"Sensitive info." That's terminology of the DoD in regards
to information that is not discussed in public. So...it is "okay"
to mention some vague generalities of claimed military
experience but the "details are sensitive!" :-)

He forgot the golden rule of story telling.

A fairy tale starts out, "Once upon a time..."

A war story starts out, "This is no ****..."

He should have started out with the "Once upon a time..." version.
Maybe the gloved one will offer him a respite at never-never land.

In other words, no hostile actions.

In other words, you're wrong.

Tsk, tsk. "In other words," Stebe was just plain LYING. :-)

Could be. Probably. Who knows? Probably not even Steve.

Maybe he's referring to being fitted for a white dinner jacket. Seven
times.

Steve, you're right as always. ""People who make up stories
about
thier careers shouldn't give the
names of places and dates when those bits of information can
be
corroborated." - Steve Robeson"

We're back to it Brian...last chance to suck it up and keep
things
gentlemanly.....

Tsk, tsk. Things "suck" on agreeing with Steve. :-)

Indeed. By "gentlemanly" he means that you must be intimidated "or
else."

Poor Stebe. He fantasizes his opponents as all being wrong,
all lying, all unlawful.

Somethings wrong with that guy. But I'd still like to hear his 7
adventure stories. Maybe over beers at the American Legion.

I wonder why he ever shot off his mouth about "seven hostile
actions"
if he is so adamant about not talking about it?

Well, Brian, you and me and everyone else reading in here know
that Stebe left the safety off and shot out that brag statement.
He
can't admit to being wrong (ever) for fear of losing his self
esteem
(in his own eyes) so he keeps pressing and pressing and pressing
on his alleged "rightness" of that claim.

Two wrong "rightnesses" don't make a right. Neither does two dozen.

If and only if those "seven hostile actions" were really
"sensitive,"
then he should NOT have admitted any such thing under the DoD
information release guidelines. Just admitting he "took part" in
some
"sensitive" activity is a direct violation of policy.

Maybe he's waiting for someone to make that "phone call."

In all probability, he never took part in any "sensitive" hostile
actions
that he "cannot talk about." He is just making up stories.
LYING.

Maybe. Probably. Who knows? Probably not even Steve.

In his latest reply to the quoted above exchanges, he tries to
misdirect
the thread into his charges of your "unlawful operation" on
amateur
bands while serving in the USAF in a foreign country.

Yep. He took his gentilemans gloves off. Such a putz.

Stebe has NO
authority of any kind to "charge" you with anything in that
regard.

Perhaps it serves to recharge his lithium?

If
he had, then he should have contacted the Judge Advocate General
office of the USAF and lodged a formal complaint...which would be
ridiculous since he has NO evidence of any wrongdoing by you. He
did not. Had he done so, he would have been laughed at (a
terrible
no-no to him).

But, but, but...

the phone is ringing somewhere.

But, "face" is everything to him, it seems. He must keep up his
ruff and tuff behavior to prove he is "superior" and therefore
will
never
ever admit to wrongdoing of HIS claims. It is always the OTHER
person who "did wrong." :-)

The Corps didn't teach him that. Prolly why he got discharged.

In one way, it is quite funny that he keeps on trying to claim
such
"hostile action" experience without any evidence of his
participation.

But he participates in amateur radio. Makes everything else he says
legit.

It gets more hilarious when he says (in another posting) that "it
has
nothing to do with amateur radio!" Tsk, tsk, if it has nothing to
do
with amateur radio, why does he keep posting on that in here? :-)

Low intelligence?

He ought to just "suck it up" and forget about it. :-)

He does look like he's got enough belly to suck up a lot misdirection.

Well, back to "amateur radio subjects" about discussions of
national
economy, national politics, and retirement plans. A valid amateur
radio license must be held to access the newsgroup? :-)

Ayup.

How's the SS holding out?

Has the gov't attached any new taxes to the payout?

Have you had to "means test" yet?

The ham Chat Room is picking up steam...

Toot toot.