|
"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
... Todd Daugherty N9OGL wrote: "Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: I'm running an information bulletin you dickhead and no matter what the **** you think their ****ing legal so get over it! Toddyboy, why don't you go away until you pass through puberty and become mature enough to post something of revelance without the use of jr. highschool language? Well if I didn't have to talk to a bunch of morons I wouldn't have to uses such language. I think you have it backwards on just who the moron is. And FYI I'm currently in college working on my degree What degree is that, "how to be jerk"? No computer science...I wouldn't be such a jerk if you would stick to the issue at hand. No where in my originally post did I state that amateur radio should run nothing but information bulletins, it was YOU and your little buddies bathroomman, and Dave Heil who keep bring it up. No instead I have to battle it out with a bunch of amateurs who are narrow minded and have the attention span of a ameba. what about you? Did that a long time ago toddyboy, but unlike you, I grew up before I did it too. Do you really think that makes anyone take your rantings more seriously? NOT!!!!!!!! Do you REALLY think I care what a bunch of appliance using CB operators think....HELL NO! Todd N9OGL Obviously you don't care what anyone thinks, but that's your problem, however your silly immature rantings do not impress anyone. Like I say, get through pimples and puberty, grow up to the point you can communicate like a mature adult without all the jr. highschool vulguarities, then maybe someone will take you half-way seriously. Sure, you don't use vulguarties, but you do try to provoke it.... Todd N9OGL ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... N9OGL wrote: How about defending one wild idea at a time before moving on to the next? You didn't write anything earlier about amateur radio coming up with new technologies worth getting into, you wrote about amateur radio falling behind in technology. It isn't. OH REALLY, tell me what new advances in radio communication have amateurs come up with in lets say last 10 to 20 years??? answer....NONE!!! Todd ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Well, how many different ways do you want to be able to exchange signal
reports and WX, or God forbid, information bulletins? How many positions do you want on the old MODE switch? The point is, try exchanging something useful or interesting rather than worrying about how the information is exchanged. You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up. You are just going to make enemies and take up space like K1MAN. Originally you planned to do your broadcast on 10 meters at 9 PM. At that time of night, no one beyond about 10 miles is going to hear you. That, right there, demonstrates your knowledge of radio and propagation. Only a freaking CBer would consider doing a 10 M broadcast at 9 PM. As for SSTV, after you exchange a few poor quality pics of the OM, the shack, or maybe the XYL's butt, what more do you do with it? You say that hams should work to ADVANCE radio communications? WTF What is the next step? DXing space aliens? ROTFLMAO |
"Bathrooman" wrote in message ups.com... Well, how many different ways do you want to be able to exchange signal reports and WX, or God forbid, information bulletins? How many positions do you want on the old MODE switch? The point is, try exchanging something useful or interesting rather than worrying about how the information is exchanged. You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up. You are just going to make enemies and take up space like K1MAN. Originally you planned to do your broadcast on 10 meters at 9 PM. At that time of night, no one beyond about 10 miles is going to hear you. That, right there, demonstrates your knowledge of radio and propagation. Only a freaking CBer would consider doing a 10 M broadcast at 9 PM. As for SSTV, after you exchange a few poor quality pics of the OM, the shack, or maybe the XYL's butt, what more do you do with it? You say that hams should work to ADVANCE radio communications? WTF What is the next step? DXing space aliens? ROTFLMAO Well, I answer you first, then I'll answer your girlfriend who emailed me. The POINT of this post is simple, Amateur radio is dying, for really two simple reasons The first is amateur radio is falling behind to the commercials. While amateur's get off on Slow Scan TV; Commercial services are able to stream live audio and video over a short band space due to digital compression. While Amateur's are fornicating themselves over 300 and 1200 baud, Commercial service with WiFi are able to go 1000 times faster, ranging from 1Mbaud to 11.5Mbaud on the 2.4GHz band. And I could go on and on. "You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up." That's Your Opinion I believe in the idea that a person should get the information and disseminate it themselves. Unlike you who I believe has this idea that this is a dictatorship and some moron and his little buddies on a newsgroup, on the internet speaks for all the amateur radio community. Secondly, you've never hear my broadcast thus, you assume that the information bulletin is useless. Finally on that, unlike K1MAN who broadcast 24/7 I'm only transmitting for one hour once a week, a far cry from what K1MAN is doing. and Unlike K1MAN I use a frequency that isn't in use and ask three times "if the frequency is in use" So don't ****ing compare me to him. That's why I orginally had it on 10 meters so not to cause interference, unlike you who would probably transmit on top of people. I do have some curiously something you and your little friends can't grasp. Which bring me to the second reason amateur radio is dying. It's little toadies like you who fear new things or something that is legal under the law and either find the frequency they are running and key up top of them, or better yet go crying to the FCC so they can supress that stations free speech simple because you don't like what they are doing. Todd, I am a friend of Bathrooman. I have read many of your posts and it is quite clear to me that you don't know what the **** you are talking about. You don't know dick about amateur radio, and you can't even write a sentence that makes any sense whatsoever. Why don't you just go back to your shack and try to work some ham at 5 WPM in the novice band. If that is too fast for you, slow it down to 2 WPM and see if you can copy that. Juilo De Jesus Now I have a question you and this little friend of yours here, are you both real amateurs or amatuer radio operator wantabe's who sit on amateur newsgroup and think your important. Todd N9OGL ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... N9OGL wrote: How about defending one wild idea at a time before moving on to the next? You didn't write anything earlier about amateur radio coming up with new technologies worth getting into, you wrote about amateur radio falling behind in technology. It isn't. OH REALLY, tell me what new advances in radio communication have amateurs come up with in lets say last 10 to 20 years??? answer....NONE!!! Perhaps you have an inner calling which drives you to demonstrate that you aren't the sharpest tack in the box, Todd. You've earlier shown an inability to write. Your latest effort reveals an inability to read. Y o u w r o t e n o t h i n g e a r l i e r a b o u t a m a t e u r r a d i o c o m i n g u p w i t h n e w t e c h n o l o g i e s. Defend your first wild claim. We'll get to the newest one afterward. Which new mode or modes are you using in your broadcasts/information bulletins? Dave K8MN |
"Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... N9OGL wrote: How about defending one wild idea at a time before moving on to the next? You didn't write anything earlier about amateur radio coming up with new technologies worth getting into, you wrote about amateur radio falling behind in technology. It isn't. OH REALLY, tell me what new advances in radio communication have amateurs come up with in lets say last 10 to 20 years??? answer....NONE!!! Perhaps you have an inner calling which drives you to demonstrate that you aren't the sharpest tack in the box, Todd. For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ. You've earlier shown an inability to write. Your latest effort reveals an inability to read. Y o u w r o t e n o t h i n g e a r l i e r a b o u t a m a t e u r r a d i o c o m i n g u p w i t h n e w t e c h n o l o g i e s. Defend your first wild claim. We'll get to the newest one afterward. \READ THE COMMENT ABOVE....as for new Idea's I'm full of deals Which new mode or modes are you using in your broadcasts/information bulletins? right now it voice however, later I attend to extend it into other modes. Todd N9OGL Dave K8MN ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message ... "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... N9OGL wrote: How about defending one wild idea at a time before moving on to the next? You didn't write anything earlier about amateur radio coming up with new technologies worth getting into, you wrote about amateur radio falling behind in technology. It isn't. OH REALLY, tell me what new advances in radio communication have amateurs come up with in lets say last 10 to 20 years??? answer....NONE!!! Perhaps you have an inner calling which drives you to demonstrate that you aren't the sharpest tack in the box, Todd. For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ. You've earlier shown an inability to write. Your latest effort reveals an inability to read. Y o u w r o t e n o t h i n g e a r l i e r a b o u t a m a t e u r r a d i o c o m i n g u p w i t h n e w t e c h n o l o g i e s. Defend your first wild claim. We'll get to the newest one afterward. READ THE COMMENT ABOVE....as for new Idea's I'm full of Ideas's Which new mode or modes are you using in your broadcasts/information bulletins? right now it voice however, later I attend to extend it into other modes. Todd N9OGL Dave K8MN ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message ... "Bathrooman" wrote in message ups.com... Well, how many different ways do you want to be able to exchange signal reports and WX, or God forbid, information bulletins? How many positions do you want on the old MODE switch? The point is, try exchanging something useful or interesting rather than worrying about how the information is exchanged. You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up. You are just going to make enemies and take up space like K1MAN. Originally you planned to do your broadcast on 10 meters at 9 PM. At that time of night, no one beyond about 10 miles is going to hear you. That, right there, demonstrates your knowledge of radio and propagation. Only a freaking CBer would consider doing a 10 M broadcast at 9 PM. As for SSTV, after you exchange a few poor quality pics of the OM, the shack, or maybe the XYL's butt, what more do you do with it? You say that hams should work to ADVANCE radio communications? WTF What is the next step? DXing space aliens? ROTFLMAO Well, I answer you first, then I'll answer your girlfriend who emailed me. The POINT of this post is simple, Amateur radio is dying, for really two simple reasons The first is amateur radio is falling behind to the commercials. You have yet to provide any proof that amateur radio is dying. You keep saying it but that is hardly proof. While amateur's get off on Slow Scan TV; Commercial services are able to stream live audio and video over a short band space due to digital compression. While Amateur's are fornicating themselves over 300 and 1200 baud, Commercial service with WiFi are able to go 1000 times faster, ranging from 1Mbaud to 11.5Mbaud on the 2.4GHz band. And I could go on and on. "You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up." That's Your Opinion I believe in the idea that a person should get the information and disseminate it themselves. Unlike you who I believe has this idea that this is a dictatorship and some moron and his little buddies on a newsgroup, on the internet speaks for all the amateur radio community. Secondly, you've never hear my broadcast thus, you assume that the information bulletin is useless. Finally on that, unlike K1MAN who broadcast 24/7 I'm only transmitting for one hour once a week, a far cry from what K1MAN is doing. and Unlike K1MAN I use a frequency that isn't in use and ask three times "if the frequency is in use" So don't ****ing compare me to him. That's why I orginally had it on 10 meters so not to cause interference, unlike you who would probably transmit on top of people. The 10 meter band was an awful choice. When it's dead, no one can hear you. When it's open, you can interfere worldwide with a few watts of power. Since one can often only hear one side of a conversation on that band, you can interfer without knowing it. I do have some curiously something you and your little friends can't grasp. Which bring me to the second reason amateur radio is dying. It's little toadies like you who fear new things or something that is legal under the law and either find the frequency they are running and key up top of them, or better yet go crying to the FCC so they can supress that stations free speech simple because you don't like what they are doing. What free speech has the FCC suppressed??? Todd, I am a friend of Bathrooman. I have read many of your posts and it is quite clear to me that you don't know what the **** you are talking about. You don't know dick about amateur radio, and you can't even write a sentence that makes any sense whatsoever. Why don't you just go back to your shack and try to work some ham at 5 WPM in the novice band. If that is too fast for you, slow it down to 2 WPM and see if you can copy that. Juilo De Jesus Now I have a question you and this little friend of yours here, are you both real amateurs or amatuer radio operator wantabe's who sit on amateur newsgroup and think your important. Todd N9OGL Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
The first is amateur radio is falling behind to the
commercials. While amateur's get off on Slow Scan TV For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ. High IQ compared to what? An ant? Where the **** did you learn to write? |
For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ.
right now it voice however, later I attend to extend it into other modes. You attend to extend it??? WTF??? |
Dee Flint wrote:
"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message ... "Bathrooman" wrote in message roups.com... Well, how many different ways do you want to be able to exchange signal reports and WX, or God forbid, information bulletins? How many positions do you want on the old MODE switch? The point is, try exchanging something useful or interesting rather than worrying about how the information is exchanged. You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up. You are just going to make enemies and take up space like K1MAN. Originally you planned to do your broadcast on 10 meters at 9 PM. At that time of night, no one beyond about 10 miles is going to hear you. That, right there, demonstrates your knowledge of radio and propagation. Only a freaking CBer would consider doing a 10 M broadcast at 9 PM. As for SSTV, after you exchange a few poor quality pics of the OM, the shack, or maybe the XYL's butt, what more do you do with it? You say that hams should work to ADVANCE radio communications? WTF What is the next step? DXing space aliens? ROTFLMAO Well, I answer you first, then I'll answer your girlfriend who emailed me. The POINT of this post is simple, Amateur radio is dying, for really two simple reasons The first is amateur radio is falling behind to the commercials. You have yet to provide any proof that amateur radio is dying. You keep saying it but that is hardly proof. While amateur's get off on Slow Scan TV; Commercial services are able to stream live audio and video over a short band space due to digital compression. While Amateur's are fornicating themselves over 300 and 1200 baud, Commercial service with WiFi are able to go 1000 times faster, ranging from 1Mbaud to 11.5Mbaud on the 2.4GHz band. And I could go on and on. "You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up." That's Your Opinion I believe in the idea that a person should get the information and disseminate it themselves. Unlike you who I believe has this idea that this is a dictatorship and some moron and his little buddies on a newsgroup, on the internet speaks for all the amateur radio community. Secondly, you've never hear my broadcast thus, you assume that the information bulletin is useless. Finally on that, unlike K1MAN who broadcast 24/7 I'm only transmitting for one hour once a week, a far cry from what K1MAN is doing. and Unlike K1MAN I use a frequency that isn't in use and ask three times "if the frequency is in use" So don't ****ing compare me to him. That's why I orginally had it on 10 meters so not to cause interference, unlike you who would probably transmit on top of people. The 10 meter band was an awful choice. When it's dead, no one can hear you. When it's open, you can interfere worldwide with a few watts of power. Since one can often only hear one side of a conversation on that band, you can interfer without knowing it. I do have some curiously something you and your little friends can't grasp. Which bring me to the second reason amateur radio is dying. It's little toadies like you who fear new things or something that is legal under the law and either find the frequency they are running and key up top of them, or better yet go crying to the FCC so they can supress that stations free speech simple because you don't like what they are doing. What free speech has the FCC suppressed??? He made some wild claim a while back about all the FCC wanted to allow was exchange of signal reports between hams. I asked him to back that statement up with some facts but he can't do it. He is just a no-nothing whinney college kid who doesn't have a clue. |
Todd Daugherty wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... N9OGL wrote: How about defending one wild idea at a time before moving on to the next? You didn't write anything earlier about amateur radio coming up with new technologies worth getting into, you wrote about amateur radio falling behind in technology. It isn't. OH REALLY, tell me what new advances in radio communication have amateurs come up with in lets say last 10 to 20 years??? answer....NONE!!! Perhaps you have an inner calling which drives you to demonstrate that you aren't the sharpest tack in the box, Todd. For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ. In what form might this claim be verified, Todd? You've certainly done a spiffy job of concealing it. You've earlier shown an inability to write. Your latest effort reveals an inability to read. Y o u w r o t e n o t h i n g e a r l i e r a b o u t a m a t e u r r a d i o c o m i n g u p w i t h n e w t e c h n o l o g i e s. Defend your first wild claim. We'll get to the newest one afterward. \READ THE COMMENT ABOVE....as for new Idea's I'm full of deals Deals? I'll take the curtain. Which new mode or modes are you using in your broadcasts/information bulletins? right now it voice however, later I attend to extend it into other modes. It voice? Which type voice mode--SSB, AM, FM? How about the new modes which you claim amateur radio should be championing? Shouldn't you be doing your broadcast/information bulletins using one of those new modes? Dave K8MN |
Todd Daugherty wrote:
"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message ... "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Todd Daugherty wrote: "Dave Heil" wrote in message ... N9OGL wrote: How about defending one wild idea at a time before moving on to the next? You didn't write anything earlier about amateur radio coming up with new technologies worth getting into, you wrote about amateur radio falling behind in technology. It isn't. OH REALLY, tell me what new advances in radio communication have amateurs come up with in lets say last 10 to 20 years??? answer....NONE!!! Perhaps you have an inner calling which drives you to demonstrate that you aren't the sharpest tack in the box, Todd. For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ. You've earlier shown an inability to write. Your latest effort reveals an inability to read. Y o u w r o t e n o t h i n g e a r l i e r a b o u t a m a t e u r r a d i o c o m i n g u p w i t h n e w t e c h n o l o g i e s. Defend your first wild claim. We'll get to the newest one afterward. READ THE COMMENT ABOVE....as for new Idea's I'm full of Ideas's Which new mode or modes are you using in your broadcasts/information bulletins? right now it voice however, later I attend to extend it into other modes. Todd N9OGL Dave K8MN ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- Hi Toddy, My name is Julio DeJesus. I am an esteemed friend of the great Bathrooman. I still think you are a retard with an IQ of about 2 or 3. You need to take a course in writing because half of the **** you post doesn't even make sense. Also, what you need to do (before you take that writing course), is to take your god damned fingers out of your ass!! You know absolutely nothing about amateur radio. The people that love amateur radio will keep the hobby alive, not the stupid ass ideas that you have come up with. |
Toddy O'Douchebag
|
Julio DeJesus wrote: Hi Toddy, My name is Julio DeJesus. I am an esteemed friend of the great Bathrooman. I still think you are a retard with an IQ of about 2 or 3. You need to take a course in writing because half of the **** you post doesn't even make sense. Also, what you need to do (before you take that writing course), is to take your god damned fingers out of your ass!! You know absolutely nothing about amateur radio. The people that love amateur radio will keep the hobby alive, not the stupid ass ideas that you have come up with. Spoken like a true Extra. More rational discourse. |
"Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Todd Daugherty" wrote in message ... "Bathrooman" wrote in message ups.com... Well, how many different ways do you want to be able to exchange signal reports and WX, or God forbid, information bulletins? How many positions do you want on the old MODE switch? The point is, try exchanging something useful or interesting rather than worrying about how the information is exchanged. You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up. You are just going to make enemies and take up space like K1MAN. Originally you planned to do your broadcast on 10 meters at 9 PM. At that time of night, no one beyond about 10 miles is going to hear you. That, right there, demonstrates your knowledge of radio and propagation. Only a freaking CBer would consider doing a 10 M broadcast at 9 PM. As for SSTV, after you exchange a few poor quality pics of the OM, the shack, or maybe the XYL's butt, what more do you do with it? You say that hams should work to ADVANCE radio communications? WTF What is the next step? DXing space aliens? ROTFLMAO Well, I answer you first, then I'll answer your girlfriend who emailed me. The POINT of this post is simple, Amateur radio is dying, for really two simple reasons The first is amateur radio is falling behind to the commercials. You have yet to provide any proof that amateur radio is dying. You keep saying it but that is hardly proof. While amateur's get off on Slow Scan TV; Commercial services are able to stream live audio and video over a short band space due to digital compression. While Amateur's are fornicating themselves over 300 and 1200 baud, Commercial service with WiFi are able to go 1000 times faster, ranging from 1Mbaud to 11.5Mbaud on the 2.4GHz band. And I could go on and on. "You aren't going to get an interested audience for your 'information bulletins,' either, because you have nothing useful to convey, so give it up." That's Your Opinion I believe in the idea that a person should get the information and disseminate it themselves. Unlike you who I believe has this idea that this is a dictatorship and some moron and his little buddies on a newsgroup, on the internet speaks for all the amateur radio community. Secondly, you've never hear my broadcast thus, you assume that the information bulletin is useless. Finally on that, unlike K1MAN who broadcast 24/7 I'm only transmitting for one hour once a week, a far cry from what K1MAN is doing. and Unlike K1MAN I use a frequency that isn't in use and ask three times "if the frequency is in use" So don't ****ing compare me to him. That's why I orginally had it on 10 meters so not to cause interference, unlike you who would probably transmit on top of people. The 10 meter band was an awful choice. When it's dead, no one can hear you. When it's open, you can interfere worldwide with a few watts of power. Since one can often only hear one side of a conversation on that band, you can interfer without knowing it. There's more room on 10 meters compared to say 20 meters secondly I ran my information bulletin around 9.00, 10.00 pm. Finally, that would apply to anything, a station on the east coast may be on a frequency and a station on the west coast can't hear him. I think a statement in one of FCC rules books which states "we can't eliminate all interference but you can minimize it. You know unlike K1MAN and W1AW I have the curiously of NOT trying to transmit over someone. I do have some curiously something you and your little friends can't grasp. Which bring me to the second reason amateur radio is dying. It's little toadies like you who fear new things or something that is legal under the law and either find the frequency they are running and key up top of them, or better yet go crying to the FCC so they can supress that stations free speech simple because you don't like what they are doing. What free speech has the FCC suppressed??? if you haven't keep up I got a message on this newsgroup from one of the FCC top Nazi, Mr.Hollingsworth. Todd N9OGL Todd, I am a friend of Bathrooman. I have read many of your posts and it is quite clear to me that you don't know what the **** you are talking about. You don't know dick about amateur radio, and you can't even write a sentence that makes any sense whatsoever. Why don't you just go back to your shack and try to work some ham at 5 WPM in the novice band. If that is too fast for you, slow it down to 2 WPM and see if you can copy that. Juilo De Jesus Now I have a question you and this little friend of yours here, are you both real amateurs or amatuer radio operator wantabe's who sit on amateur newsgroup and think your important. Todd N9OGL Dee D. Flint, N8UZE ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
WHY DON'T YOU EAT **** AND ****ING DIE!!
"Bathrooman" wrote in message ups.com... The first is amateur radio is falling behind to the commercials. While amateur's get off on Slow Scan TV For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ. High IQ compared to what? An ant? Where the **** did you learn to write? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
"Todd Daugherty" wrote in message ... "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... [snip] You have yet to provide any proof that amateur radio is dying. You keep saying it but that is hardly proof. You STILL haven't answered this question. Yet several people have asked for this proof. [snip] What free speech has the FCC suppressed??? if you haven't keep up I got a message on this newsgroup from one of the FCC top Nazi, Mr.Hollingsworth. I've kept up very well. You STILL haven't answered the question. Yet several people have asked you precisely what Hollingsworth told you. Freedom of speech has never meant you could say anything you want where ever you want whenever you want. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Todd Daugherty wrote:
There's more room on 10 meters compared to say 20 meters secondly I ran my information bulletin around 9.00, 10.00 pm. Finally, that would apply to anything, a station on the east coast may be on a frequency and a station on the west coast can't hear him. I think a statement in one of FCC rules books which states "we can't eliminate all interference but you can minimize it. You know unlike K1MAN and W1AW I have the curiously of NOT trying to transmit over someone. And by using 10 meters the chance of anyone hearing you beyond any ground wave is small, since 10 meters is open that often now. I am amazed that you are in college, yet you can't construct a clear sentence. My first grade granddaughter can construct a sentence better than you can. Read your last sentence above and see if you can figure out what is wrong with it. I do have some curiously something you and your little friends can't grasp. Which bring me to the second reason amateur radio is dying. It's little toadies like you who fear new things or something that is legal under the law and either find the frequency they are running and key up top of them, or better yet go crying to the FCC so they can supress that stations free speech simple because you don't like what they are doing. What free speech has the FCC suppressed??? if you haven't keep up I got a message on this newsgroup from one of the FCC top Nazi, Mr.Hollingsworth. And just what did he say that limits your free speech? |
Todd Daugherty wrote:
WHY DON'T YOU EAT **** AND ****ING DIE!! And another great mature response by the college twit. |
There's more room on 10 meters compared to say 20 meters secondly I
ran my information bulletin around 9.00, 10.00 pm. Finally, that would apply to anything, a station on the east coast may be on a frequency and a station on the west coast can't hear him. 10 meters is useless during a sunspot minimum but it's a good place for your useless broadcasts, especially at night when there is no propagation - so no one can hear your useless rants and whining. For your information dumbass I have an extremely high IQ. High IQ compared to what? An ant? Where the **** did you learn to write? You know unlike K1MAN and W1AW I have the curiously of NOT trying to transmit over someone. I'll ask you again, where the **** did you learn to write? You are, indeed, a special kind of nut case. |
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Todd Daugherty wrote: There's more room on 10 meters compared to say 20 meters secondly I ran my information bulletin around 9.00, 10.00 pm. Finally, that would apply to anything, a station on the east coast may be on a frequency and a station on the west coast can't hear him. I think a statement in one of FCC rules books which states "we can't eliminate all interference but you can minimize it. You know unlike K1MAN and W1AW I have the curiously of NOT trying to transmit over someone. It seems like there is more room on 10 meters because it is dead! There is no propagation! 9 or 10 PM is a perfect time for your "show" because no one will be able to hear your claptrap! At first you wanted to get into broadcasting; you were denied a license, you tried pirate radio, and now you intend to broadcast in the amateur bands...at first you called it a "show," then a "broadcast," now it's an "information bulletin!" We have an IDEAL place for your claptrap! Do it in the Children's Band! There ain't no propagation there either, but perhaps a few nearby chicken banders will copy! 10-4! Good Buddy. |
You know Bath-Whore-man to start I'm now on 20 meters. if you don't
like what I'm airing, turn the dial you and your redneck asshole buddies from the south don't have to listen. Yeah sir, I'm now in the amateur radio band transmiting by hourly program. Since I can't a broadcast license.....you little twits are stuck me hahahaha Todd N9OGL Bathrooman wrote: Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: Todd Daugherty wrote: There's more room on 10 meters compared to say 20 meters secondly I ran my information bulletin around 9.00, 10.00 pm. Finally, that would apply to anything, a station on the east coast may be on a frequency and a station on the west coast can't hear him. I think a statement in one of FCC rules books which states "we can't eliminate all interference but you can minimize it. You know unlike K1MAN and W1AW I have the curiously of NOT trying to transmit over someone. It seems like there is more room on 10 meters because it is dead! There is no propagation! 9 or 10 PM is a perfect time for your "show" because no one will be able to hear your claptrap! At first you wanted to get into broadcasting; you were denied a license, you tried pirate radio, and now you intend to broadcast in the amateur bands...at first you called it a "show," then a "broadcast," now it's an "information bulletin!" We have an IDEAL place for your claptrap! Do it in the Children's Band! There ain't no propagation there either, but perhaps a few nearby chicken banders will copy! 10-4! Good Buddy. |
Quick fix
You know Bath-Whore-man to start I'm now on 20 meters. if you don't like what I'm airing, turn the dial. you and your redneck asshole buddies from the south don't have to listen my enjoyable ONE WAY COMMUNICATION. Yeah sir, I'm now on the amateur radio band transmiting my hourly program. Since I can't a broadcast license.....you little twits are stuck me hahahaha LONG LIVE PIRATE RADIO!!!!! Todd N9OGL |
Personally I could care less if you take up every frequency in the
amateur spectrum, I am no longer active on the air, so you aren't getting in my way. What amazes people is why a fat, stupid mother****er like you spends his time broadcasting a show on AMATEUR frequencies and thinks he is doing the SERVICE a favor by informing the masses that amateur radio is dying. Not only do you NOT have an audience, which is fundamental to any broadcaster and to your "purposes" (and I use that term loosely) you are too ****ing stupid to realize something: The "listeners" are a handful of hostile hams that happen to tune across your stupid bull****. If you have nothing better to do, fine, but it might be more fun for you to go back to sucking your thumb or jerking off or just sitting with your fingers up your ass. |
No, I mean I 'could care less' because there is a slight chance that I
might be able to care a little less. Not very likely because I'm not going to be listening to this moron any time soon. |
Barry OGrady wrote:
On 2 Mar 2005 07:49:33 -0800, "Bathrooman" wrote: Personally I could care less if you take up every frequency in the amateur spectrum, You mean couldn't care less, right? If you could care less you care very much. It is amazing at how many people mis-use that phrase. |
N9OGL wrote:
You know Bath-Whore-man to start I'm now on 20 meters. if you don't like what I'm airing, turn the dial you and your redneck asshole buddies from the south don't have to listen. I hope you'll take this particular tack when Mr. Hollingsworth next contacts you, Todd. Just tell him to turn the dial. I'm sure he'll be impressed with your I'll-do-what-I-want-on-the-bands-and-to-hell- with-anyone-else view. Yeah sir, I'm now in the amateur radio band transmiting by hourly program. Since I can't a broadcast license.....you little twits are stuck me hahahaha You can't a broadcast license? I guess we're stuck you. You big IQ. You colludge material. Dave K8MN |
Personally I couldn't care less if you take up every frequency in the
amateur spectrum, I am no longer active on the air, so you aren't getting in my way. What amazes people is why a fat, stupid mother****er like you spends his time broadcasting a show on AMATEUR frequencies and thinks he is doing the SERVICE a favor by informing the masses that amateur radio is dying. Not only do you NOT have an audience, which is fundamental to any broadcaster and to your "purposes" (and I use that term loosely) you are too ****ing stupid to realize something: The "listeners" are a handful of hostile hams that happen to tune across your stupid bull****. If you have nothing better to do, fine, but it might be more fun for you to go back to sucking your thumb or jerking off or just sitting with your fingers up your ass. |
Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote: You know Bath-Whore-man to start I'm now on 20 meters. if you don't like what I'm airing, turn the dial you and your redneck asshole buddies from the south don't have to listen. I hope you'll take this particular tack when Mr. Hollingsworth next contacts you, Todd. Just tell him to turn the dial. I'm sure he'll be impressed with your I'll-do-what-I-want-on-the-bands-and-to-hell- with-anyone-else view. Dam right, I'm in amateur radio not for you, Hollingsworth, bath whore man, or any other cry baby on here...I'm in amateur radio for myself, and only that. IMHO the attempt by Hollingsworth to scare me out of doing my information is an atempt to supress my first amaendment right. Yeah sir, I'm now in the amateur radio band transmiting by hourly program. Since I can't a broadcast license.....you little twits are stuck me hahahaha You can't a broadcast license? I can't get a broadcast license....So I do it on the ham Bands hehehe I guess we're stuck you. I'm like a bad rash that you can't get rid of.... You big IQ. You colludge material. Dave K8MN anyway, My programs deals with amateur radio, and is legal. So you, Bathroom, and all the other cry babies on here wilL have deal with it. I'm not going away... Todd N9OGL |
"N9OGL" wrote in message oups.com... [snip] IMHO the attempt by Hollingsworth to scare me out of doing my information is an atempt to supress my first amaendment right. You STILL haven't told us what you were doing and what Hollingsworth said about it. Freedom of speech has NEVER meant that you can say anything you want, whenever you want, where ever you want, and however you want. Before anyone can agree with you, they need the precise data to evaluate. The continued lack of data would tend to imply that you are aware that you are in the wrong. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint had a hissy fit on Thurs, Mar 3 2005 11:59 pm and hastily
scribbled the following diatribe: "N9OGL" wrote in message roups.com... [snip] IMHO the attempt by Hollingsworth to scare me out of doing my information is an atempt to supress my first amaendment right. You STILL haven't told us what you were doing and what Hollingsworth said about it. Freedom of speech has NEVER meant that you can say anything you want, whenever you want, where ever you want, and however you want. Except in HERE... :-) Before anyone can agree with you, they need the precise data to evaluate. The continued lack of data would tend to imply that you are aware that you are in the wrong. All must agree (wholeheartedly, down to the core of their being) with traditionalist conservative standards and practices of the 1930s as preached by the Church of St. Hiram or they are WRONG, WRONG, WRONG!!! The Church can say anything but all who speak against their religion are heretics who should be burned at the stake! Ho hum...all the usual pseudo-religious harangues by the PCTAs with their usual self-righteousness. :-) Lots of that false idol worship going on in here... |
Toddy will never be able to understand what you're saying, there
LenAnder...all hail the church... |
|
Bathrooman wrote: Toddy will never be able to understand what you're saying, there LenAnder...all hail the church... Well...geewhiz...Let's figger this out... Lennie's getting his usual dose of rubbing of his nose in his newsgroup dropppings and all of a sudden we have two or three "anonymous" posters popping up with "You Go Stud" messages on his behalf. Gee...Where have we seen THIS before...?!?! Putz! And Putzii! Steve, K4YZ |
Lenny is an asshole.
|
Bathrooman wrote: Lenny is an !@#hole. Don't hold your breath waiting for me to argue that with you! Steve, K4YZ |
It is obvious to me now. Toddy is retarded! Or learning disabled,
whatever you want to call it. Look at the way he writes, and his stupid rationalizations, his incredibly stupid opinions, plus the fact that he does not learn anything...he has not learned that he will never have an audience...in spite of the fact that he stated that he has been a ham for 14 years! The ham tests have been dumbed down to the point where even a retard as stupid as Toddyboy can hop into the hobby and get a license! Well paint me pink and call me Berry! I never thought I would see the day when we had to deal with retards in ham radio. Five year old kids can pass the extra. Stubborn older retards like Toddyboy are allowed onto the bands to spout a nonsensical informational bulletin show when they cannot get a BC license...he said he applied for one SEVEN times? At least the FCC will not give a BC license to a retard. He is too stupid to realize that the only audience he will have on the ham bands is a handful of hams. |
Bathrooman wrote:
It is obvious to me now. Toddy is retarded! Or learning disabled, whatever you want to call it. Look at the way he writes, and his stupid rationalizations, his incredibly stupid opinions, plus the fact that he does not learn anything...he has not learned that he will never have an audience...in spite of the fact that he stated that he has been a ham for 14 years! The ham tests have been dumbed down to the point where even a retard as stupid as Toddyboy can hop into the hobby and get a license! Well paint me pink and call me Berry! I never thought I would see the day when we had to deal with retards in ham radio. Five year old kids can pass the extra. Stubborn older retards like Toddyboy are allowed onto the bands to spout a nonsensical informational bulletin show when they cannot get a BC license...he said he applied for one SEVEN times? At least the FCC will not give a BC license to a retard. He is too stupid to realize that the only audience he will have on the ham bands is a handful of hams. Yes Bathrooman, I agree!! Toddy is a ****in retard and not only should he not be allowed to get a BC license, he shouldn't be allowed on the ham bands. There are just too many ****in retards on the bands these days and we sure as hell don't need Toddy!! |
Julio, would you believe that Toddy wrote to Sen. John McCain
concerning the denial of his applications? He was crying about this sad situation of not being able to express himself. Ever since he got out of retard school, he has no avenue to express himself. In the letter he passed himself off as president/CEO of his own little telecommunications company. WTF ROTFLMAO |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com