Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() robert casey wrote: I dunno how many times I worked "6L6GB". "QSL via the buro". Yeah, right. ROTFLMAO! You probably did work someone who had a 6L6GB vacuum tube final in his transmitter....... :-) No doubt. But most of the serious 80M dxers in those days ran "suds", a lotta power, not just a lotta power but 'WAY too much power. Back then the max allowable power was one kW input vs. today's 1.5kW output. Any number of the Really Big Guns used homebrewed amps which tossed out a kilowatt's worth of heat alone. Or more. And those beasts weren't lossy linears either. Which is another example of blatent "impurity" in the CW bands. Offhand I'd be willing to bet that there are far fewer instances of busting the power limits today than there were back then. The FCC took the easy way out of having to bother with enforcing the power limits by roughly tripling the max allowable power input, clever labor-avoiding folk that they are. That move plus economics, the drying up of the WW2 parts sources and the need for linear amps have "solved" the excesss power problem and brought most of those bad old boys and their descendants into "compliance" today. Others: 6u6gt 6w6gt 6w4gta 6y6ga 6k5gt 6k8gt 6j5gt 6a8gt 5z4gt 5x4ga 5r4gyb 5u4gb 3q5gt 2w3gt "Tube callsigns" were a favorite but there were others and some were a tad on the raunchy side. 4Q2?? showed up more than once. Whatever it took to get some giggles. w3rv |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |