bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

And again you miss (avoid) the point. It's not about
"judging"
anyone or imposing any restrictions.

But that's all you do and all your try to do.

"...your try to do"...?!?!

No, it's not, Brian. I warned you where YOUR conduct would take
us two weeks ago. You drove right on in. "It's your world, Boss".

All I ask is that people be truthful and take responsibility for
thier actions like the rest of us do. To acknowledge their errors when
those errors have been shown and proven to BE errors.

You and Lennie think it's OK to lie and be deceitful in public. I
say that's not civil. You say I'm nuts for pointing out that you are
liars. I may be "nuts" for being as persistent as I am, but that still
doesn't diminish the fact that you and Lennie are liars.

It really is THAT simple.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:

[so angry he can't think or type straight]
wrote on Feb 22, 10:43 am:

This is a forum about Amateur Radio POLICY.

Hi! Hi, hi, hi!

Every time.

Oooooo! That's a keeper! We'd all better laminate-
that-and-keep-it-in-our-wallets! Or maybe frame it
to hang on the wall!

I think if you work 5 continents and confine all RRAP discussions to
"Amateur Radio POLICY," Hiram will say a Hail Mary for you and mail a
certificate.

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

The judge roy bean of the newsgroup has SPOKEN!

Isn't he the hanging judge? Definitely full of beans.

All hear and obey!

Here's where I have to respectfully disagree.

Except all PCTA morsemen...they can talk about
anything they want but all others are not. QED.



I get it. You were funnin about listening and obeying.

bb wrote:

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

To what purpose? Is there some new "angle" or debatable bit of
"evidence" as to why the Code exam should stay or go?

Or do you just want to give Lennie one more avenue to tell us how
he fixed radios in the 50's without a code test?

I get it. You were funnin about listening and obeying.

There's not a serious word come from Lennie is 8 years. Why
would he start today?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

To what purpose? Is there some new "angle" or debatable bit of
"evidence" as to why the Code exam should stay or go?

Or do you just want to give Lennie one more avenue to tell us
how
he fixed radios in the 50's without a code test?

A simple exercise in on-topic free speech.

Are you objecting already?

"Amateur Radio POLICY," Hiram will say a Hail Mary for you and mail a
certificate.

But...is it suitable for framing? :-)

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

Nevah hoppen, GI ! :-)

This newsgroup is the PCTA extra's Chat Room where they can
all talk about what's on their minds and express all their hatred
and frustration against those against the morse code test.

NO dissention is allowed. If dissention with the established
tradition and trappings of the Church of St. Hiram show up,
all dissenters will be harrassed, hounded, and haunted by
the PCTA extras.

The judge roy bean of the newsgroup has SPOKEN!

Isn't he the hanging judge? Definitely full of beans.

He wants to hang them high...and often. :-)

"Full of beans?" The flatulence from him is awful!


I get it. You were funnin about listening and obeying.

The PCTA extras don't get it. [they never had it... :-) ]

wrote:
"Amateur Radio POLICY," Hiram will say a Hail Mary for you and mail
a
certificate.

But...is it suitable for framing? :-)

Given a little decopage fluid and a very expensive custom frame?

Sure.

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

Nevah hoppen, GI ! :-)

This newsgroup is the PCTA extra's Chat Room where they can
all talk about what's on their minds and express all their hatred
and frustration against those against the morse code test.

NO dissention is allowed. If dissention with the established
tradition and trappings of the Church of St. Hiram show up,
all dissenters will be harrassed, hounded, and haunted by
the PCTA extras.

I hear that the Chinese have a patent infringement on the Wrenchy
Stitch, and will be flooding USA hamfests starting the 3rd week of May.

wrote:

What do you say we start a Morse Code Exam policy thread?

Nevah hoppen, GI !

Let's try and see what happens!

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:
Michael Coslo wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

wrote:

Perhaps Coslo might make it 4. Coslonaut wants so much
to be an olde-tymer he'll even refer to himself as an "extra
lite" to show his sycophantsies (e.g. synchronous fantasies).

I didn't notice that in the original post.

What a very, very odd thing to type..........


It is the latest in a very long string of very odd things which
Leonard
has typed.


One of the first times I have been accused of trying to
impress others.
Go figure. Mostly I just irritate others.


Mike, Mike, Mike. You have a callsign. You're guilty of trying
to
impress Len.

Heck, I've had it all wrong, Dave. I thought having a
callsign
*offended* him!

Maybe he's right and I am a little dull...

Trying to impress him offends him. That would, in Len-speak, make
you
"overly-proud".

Next thing you know, Len'll be picturing you in an invisible Waffen
SS
uniform and his thoughts will drift to having you punish him. It
gets
really strange *after* that.

What about the Putzmeister ISN'T "strange", Dave?

He's an ex-radio technician (wannabe engineer) who can't pass a
radio exam.

He embellished his military "career" with tales of derring-do of
guys who were KIA 3 years before he was even inducted. (And let us not
forget the "hair raising" tale of "incomming artillery" and how he
served "under the threat to the Soviet Bear" even though that "Bear"
was still being manufactured!)

He makes up stories about the alleged "dishonesty" of ARRL board
members then doesn't provide a lick of evidence.

He's quick to tell everyone else what they "are" or "aren't", yet
isn't any of those things either.

He cries "foul" over having been challenged in the eyes of the
FCC, yet has spammed ECFS with almost 2 dozen "he's not objective
because..." "rebuttals" of licensed Amateurs with decades of
experience.

He claims he can operate "anywhere" with his GROL, but can't stand
it when it's pointed out to him that his GROL SPECIFICALLY restrains
his "operating privileges".

He was never "published" in a professional journal and was part of
an Amateur Radio journal that went belly-up with him as part of the
"Editorial Staff".

He routinely makes glaring errors of fact and practice in Amateur
policy...

Could it be cuz he has no practical experience in Amateur
matters...?!?!

Me thinks so!

73

Steve, K4YZ