LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 4th 05, 04:06 AM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K4YZ wrote:
robert casey wrote:

N2EY wrote:


What if their minds *have* changed? Perhaps they have looked at

the
arguments
provided by pro-code-test folks, and at the results of the
reduction/elimination
of code testing in the USA and other countries, and have

concluded
that
Element 1 is no big deal. Maybe they've even concluded that it

*does*
serve a useful,
regulatory purpose!


The FCC noted that there's been no noticeable increase in
violations in HF since they let 5wpm'ers loose on it back
in 2000. Trouble spots like 14.313 predate that by many
years. So 13 or 20wpm doesn't serve a regulatory purpose, and
the FCC isn't in the business of handing out "gold star"
awards.


No, they're not.


Nor merit badges. The Amateur Radio Service is not the Boy Scouts.
The FCC is not BSA Headquarters.

But they ARE in the business of making sure that thier rules

meet
the test of the enabling regulations.


They should start with the "rule" requiring a Morse Code Exam at 5WPM
refer to another "rule" defining Morse Code and how to derive a 5WPM
rate. Then then need to explain how a 13-15WPM character rate can be
legal for a 5WPM exam. Or not.

Part 97.1 establishes the Basis and Purpose of the Amateur Radio
Service. The B&P continues to establish an expectation of self
training and communications skills that prepare the licensee to meet
the needs of the B & P.


The Basis and Purpose does not specify your favorite mode as the one,
true path to rightiousness.

So...Until Part 97 is altered per process otherwise, Morse Code

is
still required for access to HF allocations.


5WPM. Not the 13-15WPM exam currently administered by the ARRL and
W5YI VECs.

And as Jim noted, so far, the overwhelming opinion of those who
have cared to express an opinion is "Morse Code skills are
needed"...Even if Lennie says they aren't...

73

Steve, K4YZ


Then Jim and his commenting cronies march to the beat of a different
drummer. The ARRL's scientific survey of 1998 said that there was no
clear concensus. Since then the ITU has eliminated the requirement for
a Morse Code Exam for HF access.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK Steve Robeson K4CAP Policy 0 October 21st 04 10:38 PM
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 03:49 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 04:45 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 05:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017