Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... K4YZ wrote: whoever wrote: Blue State Liberal wrote: In her continuing move to the right, U.S. Senator Hillary Clinton today stated on the floor of the Senate that there is far too much filth and family unfriendly programming on American TV. I am reminded of the classic line from MP: "I'm tired of all this sex on the television! I keep falling off!" A few minutes later, in what seemed an odd remark to make, Senator Clinton stated were it her decision, the FCC should have been dismantled and shut down years ago. Well, it isn't her decision. The Clinton White House had 8 years to fix up FCC. They didn't. Shrub isn't doing any better but the Clintons got nothing to brag about either. She has no power so it doesn't matter what she said about the FCC, She ought to look at bill before talking about filth and family values. Kinda surreal, isn't it? I'd rethink that, Ken. Hillary has more power than any thieving white woman should be allowed, but trust me, she's coniving and will have her way. What did she steal? (Or should I say - what didn't she...) There are women out there who will vote for Hillary Clinton based upon no other criteria than she IS a woman. Of course. There are also lots of people who will *not* vote for Hillary Clinton because she is a woman. There are also lots of people who will *not* vote for Hillary Clinton because she is a Clinton. There are also lots of people who will *not* vote for Hillary Clinton because she is a Democrat. And there are also lots of people who will *not* vote for Hillary Clinton because she is not the best choice for the job. It's clear she has presidential aspirations for 2008. That's about the best thing that could happen to the Republicans, because it will almost guarantee them a victory. Forget that her husband was one of the most prolific pathological liars in the White House in over 200 years and she helped him. That's not important, really. What matters is that, according to her, Bill lied *to her* repeatedly, yet she kept on believing him when he told new lies. Now either she's very gullible, or she is lying to us. Either way it doesn't say much for her qualifications. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. (No wonder folks like Lennie Anderson and Brian Burke don't think twice about doing it...Clinton set the trend...) Hmmmm... Forget that she still has never satisfactorially answered the questions about her real estate dealings. Heck no! Martha Stewart went to jail for 6 months just becasue she acted on a stock tip, yet Hillary won't pay so mauch as attention. It's about getting caught. Martha got caught. Now watch - she will turn that whole thing to an advantage and will come back bigger than ever. Forget that Hillary was responsible for STEALING real property from the White House as she and Billary were on thier way out the door in 2000. "Oh...that's not ours? Well...I guess we'll put it back..." Dodged ayet another bullet. I think you mean "govt. property". REAL property means real estate. Forget that she facilitated (or at least tolerated) her husband's philanderings all-the-while promoting herself as the champion of women's rights and equal opportunity. See above about not seeing what was going on. As Billary's "Health Care Advocate" in 90's, she didn't do a single worthy thing. She and Bill brandished a "health care card" at his first "State of the Union" address, but that was the end of it. Health care benefits for the uninsured, under-insured, the aged and catastrophically ill or infirmed are threadbare, to say the least. That one sank and never popped up again. But, unfortunatley, people will still vote for her...Again, just because she wears a skirt. I think there are far more who will not vote for her, for the reasons listed above. The fact is that in every election there are several groups: 1) Those who will vote Republican no matter what 2) Those who will vote Democrat no matter what 3) Those who won't vote, or will vote for a 3rd party candidate with absolutely no real chance of winning, no matter what 4) Those who are truly independent, and who may vote Democrat, Republican, 3rd party, or not at all, depending on a wide variety of factors, and whose votes really can decide an election. Successful campaigning is all about identifying the 4th group, and getting them to vote for your candidate. 73 de Jim, N2EY Looney Liberal Blue state Democrats SUCK. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) - Panorama - "The Clinton Interview" Broadcast on BBC | Shortwave | |||
Missing Bill Clinton | Shortwave | |||
SURPRISE!! As 2004 Nears, Bush Pins Slump on Clinton | General | |||
SURPRISE!! As 2004 Nears, Bush Pins Slump on Clinton | Scanner |