bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Becasue it was pertinent at the time.

Pertinent, how?

Beacause Lennie is an antagonist.

And you're not?

Nope.

Hi! Good one.

Hello yourself.

And the antagonist is the one who's here without a reason TO be
here.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Becasue it was pertinent at the time.

Pertinent, how?

Beacause Lennie is an antagonist.

And you're not?

Nope.

Hi! Good one.

Hello yourself.

And the antagonist is the one who's here without a reason TO be
here.

Steve, K4YZ

It would appear that everyone has a reason to be here. Even you. You
enjoy antagonizing others. You are an antagonist.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

And the antagonist is the one who's here without a reason TO
be
here.

It would appear that everyone has a reason to be here. Even you.
You
enjoy antagonizing others. You are an antagonist.

I do not "antagonize" anyone.

I DO hold you and Lennie, and lately Todd, up to your own
deceitful, mistruthful and erroneous assertions...That would NOT be
possible if what you were saying was true.

This week alone I've posted at least four other items that
patently undermined your allegations of the "overblown" ARES and how
they will never "respond" in a crisis.

If you find that "antagonizing", Brian, I am sorry, but hey, it
was YOUR false assertion and running off at the mouth that brought
things to this stage.

Don't like it? STOP RUNNING OFF AT THE MOUTH WITH EASILY
DISPROVEN ASSERTIONS, BRIAN! ! ! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

And the antagonist is the one who's here without a reason TO
be
here.

It would appear that everyone has a reason to be here. Even you.
You
enjoy antagonizing others. You are an antagonist.

I do not "antagonize" anyone.

Lie #23.

I DO hold you and Lennie, and lately Todd, up to your own
deceitful, mistruthful and erroneous assertions...That would NOT be
possible if what you were saying was true.

My opinions stand on "thier" own. Like my opinion of amateur
volunteers solving all communications emergencies. You can lie,
twist-up, and try to change the rules of the game, but you failed
miserably to show my opinion to be wrong.

This week alone I've posted at least four other items that
patently undermined your allegations of the "overblown" ARES and how
they will never "respond" in a crisis.

"Never respond?" Who said that??? Post it or accept Lie #24.

If you find that "antagonizing", Brian, I am sorry, but hey, it
was YOUR false assertion and running off at the mouth that brought
things to this stage.

Indeed you follow your lies with antagonism. You even precede your
lies with antagonism.

Don't like it? STOP RUNNING OFF AT THE MOUTH WITH EASILY
DISPROVEN ASSERTIONS, BRIAN! ! ! ! ! ! !

Bricks and slashed tires?

You got fired as schedule writer for the exercise because you left the
first six hours of the exercise without support. Then you
undersupported the entire remainder of the exercise. Hopefully you
didn't learn that trick in the USMC.

From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 5:22 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

And the antagonist is the one who's here without a reason
TO be here.

It would appear that everyone has a reason to be here. Even you.
You
enjoy antagonizing others. You are an antagonist.

I do not "antagonize" anyone.

Lie #23.

That Robeson insults ANYONE who speaks negatively about Him is
evidenciary enough for anyone (but buddies of Pstevie). Google
has enough archives of his antagonistic postings to fill a few
volumes. :-)

His problem is exascerbated by all the LIES he has told about
others...in addition to or aligned with his personal insults
of others.

I DO hold you and Lennie, and lately Todd, up to your own
deceitful, mistruthful and erroneous assertions...That would NOT be
possible if what you were saying was true.

My opinions stand on "thier" own. Like my opinion of amateur
volunteers solving all communications emergencies. You can lie,
twist-up, and try to change the rules of the game, but you failed
miserably to show my opinion to be wrong.

Robeson FAILS (miserably) to show ANYONE's opinions to be
wrong. Still, he keeps on with the personal defamations
and insults. Tsk.

Note that his antagonistic and hateful manner MUST include
those of his "enemies" who, like myself, weren't a part of
a thread. That is extended antagonism, a desire to FIGHT
and much less than a discussion on a subject.

This week alone I've posted at least four other items that
patently undermined your allegations of the "overblown" ARES and how
they will never "respond" in a crisis.

"Never respond?" Who said that??? Post it or accept Lie #24.

Robeson hasn't posted ANYTHING proving his point. His
content is all about himself and personal insults against
his "opponents." That's rather sick.

If you find that "antagonizing", Brian, I am sorry, but hey, it
was YOUR false assertion and running off at the mouth that brought
things to this stage.

Indeed you follow your lies with antagonism. You even precede your
lies with antagonism.

Quite true. But...the whole purpose of Robeson's messaging
in here is the constant, sociopathic insulting of others who
have written negative opinions of Robeson.

Don't like it? STOP RUNNING OFF AT THE MOUTH WITH EASILY
DISPROVEN ASSERTIONS, BRIAN! ! ! ! ! ! !

Bricks and slashed tires?

So far, Robeson hasn't "easily disproven" anything. Such
"disproving" is merely his personal-insult commentary on
yourself (and others). Perhaps a new word needs to be
coined: "Diss Proof" a la Robeson. His "proof" is merely
an absolute statement that his opponent "LIES." He needs
nothing else, yet he needs MUCH more such as ACTUAL proof.

Robeson is an example of the modern U.S. Amateur Extra.

His problem is exascerbated by all the LIES he has told about
others...in addition to or aligned with his personal insults of
others.

I'll agree with that..

Robeson FAILS (miserably) to show ANYONE's opinions to be
wrong. Still, he keeps on with the personal defamations
and insults. Tsk.
Note that his antagonistic and hateful manner MUST include
those of his "enemies" who, like myself, weren't a part of
a thread. That is extended antagonism, a desire to FIGHT
and much less than a discussion on a subject

Again I'll agree with that.....Steve is someone who wants you to think
his way and only his way

Robeson hasn't posted ANYTHING proving his point. His
content is all about himself and personal insults against
his "opponents." That's rather sick.

I agree Len, I've asked Steve repeative to prove where in the amateur
rules does it state that an information bulletin can't be opinionated,
but has yet to quote a rule or an FCC decision. Steve Robeson is a
pathalogical liar.

Todd N9OGL

From: "N9OGL" on Mon,Apr 18 2005 7:58 pm

His problem is exascerbated by all the LIES he has told about
others...in addition to or aligned with his personal insults of
others.

I'll agree with that..

...and it is surely guaranteed that Robeson will pile
on more spiteful vitriol in here for your saying that.

Robeson FAILS (miserably) to show ANYONE's opinions to be
wrong. Still, he keeps on with the personal defamations
and insults. Tsk.
Note that his antagonistic and hateful manner MUST include
those of his "enemies" who, like myself, weren't a part of
a thread. That is extended antagonism, a desire to FIGHT
and much less than a discussion on a subject

Again I'll agree with that.....Steve is someone who wants you to think
his way and only his way

Well, also DO what he says... :-)

Robeson hasn't posted ANYTHING proving his point. His
content is all about himself and personal insults against
his "opponents." That's rather sick.

I agree Len, I've asked Steve repeative to prove where in the amateur
rules does it state that an information bulletin can't be opinionated,
but has yet to quote a rule or an FCC decision. Steve Robeson is a
pathalogical liar.

I don't know about the "pathology" part but, removing
that label leaves the rest of what you wrote as TRUE.
He has trouble communicating without emotion, strong
emotion. So strong that he is in extremes on nearly
everything.

His list of "enemies" keeps building up and his
attempts at communication in here wind up as flame
war ignitors as he tries to "battle his foes."

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

And the antagonist is the one who's here without a reason
TO
be
here.

It would appear that everyone has a reason to be here. Even you.
You
enjoy antagonizing others. You are an antagonist.

I do not "antagonize" anyone.

Lie #23.

I DO hold you and Lennie, and lately Todd, up to your own
deceitful, mistruthful and erroneous assertions...That would NOT be
possible if what you were saying was true.

My opinions stand on "thier" own. Like my opinion of amateur
volunteers solving all communications emergencies. You can lie,
twist-up, and try to change the rules of the game, but you failed
miserably to show my opinion to be wrong.

It wasn't an opinion.

YOU stated that ARES was overblown and that ARES would not/could
not respond due to the aging demographic of the membership. You
continued to try and use me as an example of "overburdened" memebers.

This week alone I've posted at least four other items that
patently undermined your allegations of the "overblown" ARES and
how
they will never "respond" in a crisis.

"Never respond?" Who said that??? Post it or accept Lie #24.

You said that and you still have yet to prove your alleged Lie #1.

If you find that "antagonizing", Brian, I am sorry, but hey,
it
was YOUR false assertion and running off at the mouth that brought
things to this stage.

Indeed you follow your lies with antagonism. You even precede your
lies with antagonism.

Don't like it? STOP RUNNING OFF AT THE MOUTH WITH EASILY
DISPROVEN ASSERTIONS, BRIAN! ! ! ! ! ! !

Bricks and slashed tires?

What bricks? What slashed tires?

You CONTINUE to support my assertions of YOUR dishonesty by
continuing to make this suggestion of threats, yet you've not
substantiated a word of it, Brian.

Why do you continue to perpetuate this?

You got fired as schedule writer for the exercise because you left
the
first six hours of the exercise without support.

You've already been proven wrong three times.

You're going for four?

Then you
undersupported the entire remainder of the exercise. Hopefully you
didn't learn that trick in the USMC.

It wasn't undersupported. All shift were covered, double coved
duing the peak hours of the day.

Here's ANOTHER assertion you continue to make despite having been
proven wrong. WHY do you embarrass yourself in public like this?

Steve, K4YZ