Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio
I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934. =A7 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created For the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio so as to make available, so far as possible, to all the people of the United States, without discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex, a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire and radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges, for the purpose of the national defense, for the purpose of promoting safety of life and property through the use of wire and radio communications, and for the purpose of securing a more effective execution of this policy by centralizing authority heretofore granted by law to several agencies and by granting additional authority with respect to interstate and foreign commerce in wire and radio communication, there is created a commission to be known as the "Federal Communications Commission", which shall be constituted as hereinafter provided, and which shall execute and enforce the provisions of this chapter. As well as 152 of the communication act =A7 152. Application of chapter (a) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all interstate and foreign communication by wire or radio and all interstate and foreign transmission of energy by radio, which originates and/or is received within the United States, and to all persons engaged within the United States in such communication or such transmission of energy by radio, and to the licensing and regulating of all radio stations as hereinafter provided; but it shall not apply to persons engaged in wire or radio communication or transmission in the Canal Zone, or to wire or radio communication or transmission wholly within the Canal Zone. The provisions of this chapter shall apply with respect to cable service, to all persons engaged within the United States in providing such service, and to the facilities of cable operators which relate to such service, as provided in subchapter V-A. or how about 153 of the communication act =A7 153. Definitions (22) Interstate communication The term "interstate communication" or "interstate transmission" means communication or transmission (A) from any State, Territory, or possession of the United States (other than the Canal Zone), or the District of Columbia, to any other State, Territory, or possession of the United States (other than the Canal Zone), or the District of Columbia, (B) from or to the United States to or from the Canal Zone, insofar as such communication or transmission takes place within the United States, or (C) between points within the United States but through a foreign country; but shall not, with respect to the provisions of subchapter II of this chapter (other than section 223 of this title), include wire or radio communication between points in the same State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, through any place outside thereof, if such communication is regulated by a State commission. do I need to go on....... Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs. This post dickhead had nothing to do with me...it had to do with the behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that isn't there. A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem to have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil be getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep acting like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself. Dave K8MN Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: (Attributions inserted for sanity) That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934. § 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created As well as 152 of the communication act § 152. Application of chapter or how about 153 of the communication act § 153. Definitions do I need to go on....... You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've read and misinterpreted them. Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs. This post dickhead had nothing to do with me... Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you. it had to do with the behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that isn't there. Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts. In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you. A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem to have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil be getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep acting like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself. Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU. Actually, you said, "Go Fo It". What is it that I'd be letting myself in for, Toddkins? Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. Dave K8MN |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: (Attributions inserted for sanity) That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934. =A7 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created As well as 152 of the communication act =A7 152. Application of chapter or how about 153 of the communication act =A7 153. Definitions do I need to go on....... You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've read and misinterpreted them. Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs. This post dickhead had nothing to do with me... Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you. it had to do with the behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that isn't there. Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts. In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you. WELL YOU ****ING BITCH IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU ****ING ASSHOLE ON APPLYING FOR A LICENSE??? A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem to have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil be getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep acting like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself. Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU. Actually, you said, "Go Fo It". What is it that I'd be letting myself in for, Toddkins? Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ****ING SLUT Dave K8MN |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: (Attributions inserted for sanity) That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934. =A7 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created As well as 152 of the communication act =A7 152. Application of chapter or how about 153 of the communication act =A7 153. Definitions do I need to go on....... You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've read and misinterpreted them. Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs. This post dickhead had nothing to do with me... Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you. it had to do with the behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that isn't there. Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts. In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you. WELL YOU ####ING ##### IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU ####ING ###HOLE ON APPLYING FOR A LICENSE??? The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie! You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee. Period. A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem to have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil be getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep acting like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself. Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU. Actually, you said, "Go Fo It". What is it that I'd be letting myself in for, Toddkins? Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ####ING ####. Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license. One or the other is wrong. Now which is it? Steve, K4YZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie!
You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee. Period. Prove it you freaking moron. Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license. One or the other is wrong. Now which is it? NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing...so **** YOU!!!!! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote: Without attributes again... very inconsiderate, Todd. The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie! You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee. Period. Prove it you freaking moron. I don't have to, Todd. YOU prove it EVERY time you post...EVERY time. Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license. One or the other is wrong. Now which is it? NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing...so #### YOU!!!!! No, they are NOT the same thing. Your legal name is either O'Dochartaigh or it's Daugherty. Steve, K4YZ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote: NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing...so #### YOU!!!!! No, they are NOT the same thing. Your legal name is either O'Dochartaigh or it's Daugherty. This guy is a piece of work. Dave Clouston (Clouston and Heil are the same thing, or at least are close enough) K8MN |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie! You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee. Period. Prove it you freaking moron. Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license. One or the other is wrong. Now which is it? NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing... No they are not. On your FCC license, as any legal document, it must be spelled like your legal name, so if it isn't spelled correctly on your FCC license, then your license isn't valid because it doesn't contain your legal signature and that means every time you get on the air, you are illegal. so **** YOU!!!!! There goes the Jr. Highschool language again. Grow up toddyboy! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: N9OGL wrote: Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license. One or the other is wrong. Now which is it? NO it isn't you dumb###, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing... No they are not. On your FCC license, as any legal document, it must be spelled like your legal name, so if it isn't spelled correctly on your FCC license, then your license isn't valid because it doesn't contain your legal signature and that means every time you get on the air, you are illegal. We shouldn't try and confuse Toddie with facts. I am sure there is some American's with Disabilities Act regulation that prohibits telling the mentally incompetent that they ARE mentally incompetent. so #### YOU!!!!! There goes the Jr. Highschool language again. Grow up toddyboy! If MY Junior High Schooler came home using language like that, there'd be some serious attitude realignemt going on shortly therafter. Disappointing that this is coming from a soon-to-be college graduate, eh??? Steve, K4YZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie! You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee. Period. Prove it you freaking moron. Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license. One or the other is wrong. Now which is it? NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same thing... No it isn't toddyboy, the way it is spelled on your birth certificate is your legal name, unless you have had it legally changed, the other spelling is not. Now if you have the incorrect spelling on your FCC Amateur Radio License, which is a legal document, then your Amateur Radio License isn't valid and you are operating illegally when you transmit using that license. so **** YOU!!!!! Grow up toddyboy!!!!! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |