That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio

I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934.


=A7 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created

For the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in
communication by wire and radio so as to make available, so far as
possible, to all the people of the United States, without
discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin,
or sex, a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire and radio
communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges,
for the purpose of the national defense, for the purpose of promoting
safety of life and property through the use of wire and radio
communications, and for the purpose of securing a more effective
execution of this policy by centralizing authority heretofore granted
by law to several agencies and by granting additional authority with
respect to interstate and foreign commerce in wire and radio
communication, there is created a commission to be known as the
"Federal Communications Commission", which shall be constituted as
hereinafter provided, and which shall execute and enforce the
provisions of this chapter.

As well as 152 of the communication act

=A7 152. Application of chapter

(a) The provisions of this chapter shall apply to all interstate and
foreign communication by wire or radio and all interstate and foreign
transmission of energy by radio, which originates and/or is received
within the United States, and to all persons engaged within the United
States in such communication or such transmission of energy by radio,
and to the licensing and regulating of all radio stations as
hereinafter provided; but it shall not apply to persons engaged in wire
or radio communication or transmission in the Canal Zone, or to wire or
radio communication or transmission wholly within the Canal Zone. The
provisions of this chapter shall apply with respect to cable service,
to all persons engaged within the United States in providing such
service, and to the facilities of cable operators which relate to such
service, as provided in subchapter V-A.


or how about 153 of the communication act


=A7 153. Definitions

(22) Interstate communication
The term "interstate communication" or "interstate
transmission" means communication or transmission
(A) from any State, Territory, or possession of the United States
(other than the Canal Zone), or the District of Columbia, to any other
State, Territory, or possession of the United States (other than the
Canal Zone), or the District of Columbia,
(B) from or to the United States to or from the Canal Zone, insofar as
such communication or transmission takes place within the United
States, or
(C) between points within the United States but through a foreign
country; but shall not, with respect to the provisions of subchapter II
of this chapter (other than section 223 of this title), include wire or
radio communication between points in the same State, Territory, or
possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, through
any place outside thereof, if such communication is regulated by a
State commission.

do I need to go on.......

Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from

"innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived
words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs.
This post dickhead had nothing to do with me...it had to do with the
behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged
interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state
anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that
isn't there.


A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem
to
have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil
be
getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and
lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some
copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep acting

like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license
yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself.

Dave K8MN


Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU.


Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

(Attributions inserted for sanity)

That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio

I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934.

§ 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created

As well as 152 of the communication act

§ 152. Application of chapter

or how about 153 of the communication act

§ 153. Definitions

do I need to go on.......

You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've
read and misinterpreted them.

Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived
words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs.

This post dickhead had nothing to do with me...

Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you.

it had to do with the
behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged
interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state
anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that
isn't there.

Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts.
In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations
which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power
levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some
places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating
without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I
didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you.

A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem
to
have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil
be
getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and
lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some
copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep acting

like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license
yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself.

Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU.

Actually, you said, "Go Fo It". What is it that I'd be letting myself
in for, Toddkins?

Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL

Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to
ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really
invented.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

(Attributions inserted for sanity)

That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio

I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934.

=A7 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission
created

As well as 152 of the communication act

=A7 152. Application of chapter

or how about 153 of the communication act

=A7 153. Definitions

do I need to go on.......

You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've
read and misinterpreted them.

Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you
went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your
own archived
words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs.

This post dickhead had nothing to do with me...

Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you.

it had to do with the
behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged
interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I
state
anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff
that
isn't there.

Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two
parts.
In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV
stations
which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power
levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in
some
places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating
without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I
didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you.

WELL YOU ****ING BITCH IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND
WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY
SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU ****ING ASSHOLE ON
APPLYING FOR A LICENSE???



A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't
seem
to
have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or
Phil
be
getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds
and
lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some
copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep
acting

like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license
yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself.

Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU.

Actually, you said, "Go Fo It". What is it that I'd be letting
myself
in for, Toddkins?

Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL

Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have
to
ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really
invented.
IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ****ING SLUT



Dave K8MN

N9OGL wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

(Attributions inserted for sanity)

That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio

I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934.

=A7 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission
created

As well as 152 of the communication act

=A7 152. Application of chapter

or how about 153 of the communication act

=A7 153. Definitions

do I need to go on.......

You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em.
You've
read and misinterpreted them.

Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you
went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome.
Your
own archived
words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs.

This post dickhead had nothing to do with me...

Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you.

it had to do with the
behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged
interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I
state
anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff
that
isn't there.

Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two
parts.
In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV
stations
which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15
power
levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in
some
places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating
without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw.
I
didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you.

WELL YOU ####ING ##### IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND
WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY
SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU ####ING ###HOLE ON
APPLYING FOR A LICENSE???

The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie!

You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee.

Period.

A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't
seem
to
have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or
Phil
be
getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds
and
lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps
some
copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep
acting

like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio
license
yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself.

Like I said Davy GO FOR IT!!!!! I DARE YOU.

Actually, you said, "Go Fo It". What is it that I'd be letting
myself
in for, Toddkins?

Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL

Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have
to
ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really
invented.

IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ####ING ####.

Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license.

One or the other is wrong. Now which is it?

Steve, K4YZ

The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie!
You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee.
Period.

Prove it you freaking moron.


Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license.
One or the other is wrong. Now which is it?


NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same
thing...so **** YOU!!!!!

N9OGL wrote:

Without attributes again... very inconsiderate, Todd.

The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie!
You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee.
Period.

Prove it you freaking moron.

I don't have to, Todd.

YOU prove it EVERY time you post...EVERY time.

Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license.
One or the other is wrong. Now which is it?


NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same
thing...so #### YOU!!!!!

No, they are NOT the same thing.

Your legal name is either O'Dochartaigh or it's Daugherty.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:

N9OGL wrote:

NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same
thing...so #### YOU!!!!!

No, they are NOT the same thing.

Your legal name is either O'Dochartaigh or it's Daugherty.

This guy is a piece of work.

Dave Clouston (Clouston and Heil are the same thing, or at least are
close enough) K8MN

N9OGL wrote:
The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie!
You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee.
Period.


Prove it you freaking moron.


Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license.
One or the other is wrong. Now which is it?


NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same
thing...


No they are not. On your FCC license, as any legal document, it must be
spelled like your legal name, so if it isn't spelled correctly on your
FCC license, then your license isn't valid because it doesn't contain
your legal signature and that means every time you get on the air, you
are illegal.

so **** YOU!!!!!

There goes the Jr. Highschool language again. Grow up toddyboy!

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license.
One or the other is wrong. Now which is it?

NO it isn't you dumb###, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same
thing...

No they are not. On your FCC license, as any legal document, it must
be
spelled like your legal name, so if it isn't spelled correctly on
your
FCC license, then your license isn't valid because it doesn't contain

your legal signature and that means every time you get on the air,
you
are illegal.

We shouldn't try and confuse Toddie with facts. I am sure there is
some American's with Disabilities Act regulation that prohibits telling
the mentally incompetent that they ARE mentally incompetent.

so #### YOU!!!!!

There goes the Jr. Highschool language again. Grow up toddyboy!

If MY Junior High Schooler came home using language like that,
there'd be some serious attitude realignemt going on shortly therafter.

Disappointing that this is coming from a soon-to-be college
graduate, eh???

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:

The point is you SHOULDN'T, Toddie!
You're not adequately qualified to be a broadcast licensee.
Period.


Prove it you freaking moron.


Sure it is. Either that, or you've lied on your FCC license.
One or the other is wrong. Now which is it?


NO it isn't you dumbass, O'Dochartaigh and Daugherty are the same
thing...


No it isn't toddyboy, the way it is spelled on your birth certificate is
your legal name, unless you have had it legally changed, the other
spelling is not. Now if you have the incorrect spelling on your FCC
Amateur Radio License, which is a legal document, then your Amateur
Radio License isn't valid and you are operating illegally when you
transmit using that license.

so **** YOU!!!!!

Grow up toddyboy!!!!!