Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: (Attributions inserted for sanity) That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio I suggest you read Section 151 of the communication Act of 1934. § 151. Purposes of chapter; Federal Communications Commission created As well as 152 of the communication act § 152. Application of chapter or how about 153 of the communication act § 153. Definitions do I need to go on....... You didn't need to insert them to begin with. I've read 'em. You've read and misinterpreted them. Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went from "innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own archived words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs. This post dickhead had nothing to do with me... Sure it does, Todd Not-Very-Swift. It is all about you. it had to do with the behavior of the FCC and pirate radio operators and their "alleged interference" with boadcast Stations. No where in that post did I state anything about me, but Dumb asses like yourself read into stuff that isn't there. Wise up, Todd. I posted a number of your archived posts in two parts. In a number of them, you admit to operating pirate radio and TV stations which operate on self-assigned frequencies in excess of Part 15 power levels (by a bunch). You confess to operating without a license in some places and in others you profess that you'll go back to operating without a license. You've admitted, publicly to being a scofflaw. I didn't read anything which wasn't plainly stated by you. WELL YOU F--KING BITCH IF THEY WOULD OF CONSIDER MY APPLICATION AND WAIVER LIKE THEIR SUPPOSE TOO THEN I WOULDN'T OF DID WHAT I DID, WHY SHOULD I CONTINUE TO SPEND THE TIME AND MONEY YOU F--KING ASSHOLE ON APPLYING FOR A LICENSE??? Considering your request for a waiver and acting favorably upon your request are two very different things. With your history, it doesn't seem very likely that the Commission will ever issue you a broadcast license. So, the answer to your question about why you should continue to spend the time and money applying is: You probably shouldn't. You should come to terms with the fact that you aren't ever likely to have a broadcast license. Operating without a license can only lead you to grief. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Awwww! You've used that fictitious name again. Now you won't have to ask "what ficticious name?". It is the one thing you've really invented. IT'S NOT FICTICIOUS YOU ****ING SLUT The word is "fictitious", Todd, not "FICTICIOUS" and yes, if that isn't your legal name, it is a fiction. By the way, I experienced an N9OGL time travel episode this afternoon. I opened a book and there was a message from my father written in the fly leaf. It was from 45 years in the past. Dave K8MN |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
a great read | CB | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy |