Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 24th 05, 06:06 AM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


N9OGL wrote (again violating nettiquette by ignoring attributes):
I will point out that that is the ARRL National Band Plan....Band

plans
do vary from state to state.....but I'm sure your aware of that.


OK, Todd...enlighten us with the Illinois 2 meter Band Plan.

Please provide us with the URL to the agency coordinating V/UHF
allocations in Illinois.

Steve, K4YZ

  #2   Report Post  
Old March 24th 05, 06:19 AM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I really know what Illinois Bandplan is.....but I do know it vary from
state to state.....because I believe Califorina does not recognize the
"experimental part" of the 2 meter ham band.

  #3   Report Post  
Old March 24th 05, 06:36 AM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


N9OGL wrote (more failure to observe nettiquette noted):
I really know what Illinois Bandplan is.....but I do know it vary

from
state to state.....because I believe Califorina does not recognize

the
"experimental part" of the 2 meter ham band.


Did you mean "I know what the Illinois Bandplan is"..?!?!

Or did you mean "I really don't know what the bandplan is"..?!?!

And you're not IN California, now are you? (Although I quite
readily accept that you're "...in a different state...of mind...")

So...busted AGAIN on yet another bit of INFORMATION that you have
absolutely NO IDEA about but were quite willing to ACT like you did.

Idiot.

Steve, K4YZ

  #4   Report Post  
Old March 24th 05, 06:42 AM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

well I do know here in Illinois that they allow voice repeaters on the
Amateur Television frequencies on 440. I also know that here in
Illinois 145.5 to 145.8 is used here in Illinois for everything from
wireless Amateur radio LAN to echolink. if anything I run my
information bulletin on 146.835 Mhz hehehe

  #5   Report Post  
Old March 24th 05, 07:13 AM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


N9OGL wrote:
well I do know here in Illinois that they allow voice repeaters on

the
Amateur Television frequencies on 440.


But that's not what we're talking about.

The thread says "N9OGL to bust 2 meter band plan..."

I also know that here in
Illinois 145.5 to 145.8 is used here in Illinois for everything from
wireless Amateur radio LAN to echolink.


So you were ready to knowingly start using a relatively wideband
mode in a part of the spectrum where low power data is being used...

if anything I run my
information bulletin on 146.835 Mhz hehehe


At least you'd be on a repeater OUTPUT, and hence operating on a
frequency planned for simplex and repeater outputs...THEN all you have
to "worry" about will be causing interference to coordinated repeaters
on 146.82 and .85.

So what's your problem with picking an unused simplex frequency
between 146.40-146.595 and 147.405 to 147.585 where simplex is supposed
to be?

Steve, K4YZ



  #6   Report Post  
Old March 24th 05, 07:29 AM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
well I do know here in Illinois that they allow voice repeaters on

the
Amateur Television frequencies on 440.


But that's not what we're talking about.

The thread says "N9OGL to bust 2 meter band plan..."

I also know that here in
Illinois 145.5 to 145.8 is used here in Illinois for everything

from
wireless Amateur radio LAN to echolink.


So you were ready to knowingly start using a relatively wideband
mode in a part of the spectrum where low power data is being used...

if anything I run my
information bulletin on 146.835 Mhz hehehe


At least you'd be on a repeater OUTPUT, and hence operating on a
frequency planned for simplex and repeater outputs...THEN all you

have
to "worry" about will be causing interference to coordinated

repeaters
on 146.82 and .85.


my signal isn't that wide




So what's your problem with picking an unused simplex frequency
between 146.40-146.595 and 147.405 to 147.585 where simplex is

supposed
to be?

i'll probably stick with 146.835 - 600 Khz

Todd n9ogl
Steve, K4YZ


  #7   Report Post  
Old March 24th 05, 07:36 AM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote: (WOOOOHOOOO! He finally TOOK THE HINT!)

At least you'd be on a repeater OUTPUT, and hence operating on

a
frequency planned for simplex and repeater outputs...THEN all you

have
to "worry" about will be causing interference to coordinated

repeaters
on 146.82 and .85.


my signal isn't that wide


It doesn't ahve to be 'wide' to casue interference, Todd.

So what's your problem with picking an unused simplex frequency
between 146.40-146.595 and 147.405 to 147.585 where simplex is

supposed
to be?


i'll probably stick with 146.835 - 600 Khz


Then you require coordination, Todd. Have you already applied for
that? Or are you telling the coordinating authority to get ####ed too?

Steve, K4YZ

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC Amateur Radio Enforcement Letters for the Period Ending May 1, 2004 private General 0 May 10th 04 09:39 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 March 27th 04 09:21 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 Radionews General 0 March 27th 04 09:20 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 March 27th 04 09:20 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 March 27th 04 09:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017