| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Boy Broadcaster N9OGL - Part II
More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives:
from alt.sci.time-travel Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up a computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty years someone would reply back. comments? Todd Daugherty N9OGL Amateur Radio Operator (and) Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 10:44 pm The Answer to your first question is yes. A computer hooked to a TNC (which is a wireless modem) is set up with a timing system. Most "Packet" software for wireless communication has a timer system in it. It's part of the software. Why wait so long for the signal to transmit? because you want to be able to send the signal to a time period where high speed communication systems are in general uses. Scientist are now just experimenting with high speed communication devices. For a person to send a signal back in time they would have to uses a high speed communication devices. Just remember it is a lot easier to sent a particle or a signal through time then it is human or an object. On your second comment about time travel via the human brain. I believe not only "time-travel" is possible via the human brain but I also believe while a person is a sleep the electro-magnetic emissions of say your brain is connected to the multi-you in every parallel universe. The only time your able to view those other universes is while your Brainwaves are at the lowest point of the spectrum (around 1 to 14 hz) This also might explain NDE. Todd N9OGL (and) Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 10:57 pm The idea is basic....A person hooks a TNC (wireless modem) to VHF or UHF transmitter and setting the parameters to transmit a signal thirty years in the future. With Bandplans changing often the sinal will be heard by someone. The person on the recieving end would have to respond via a high speed communication system (scientist are just now experimenting with it) The transmitter would have to be placed in a place somewhere where no one will distrub it and it would have to be connected to a continous power source. As I stated in a another post it easier to send a signal or a particle through time then it is to send a human or a machine. Todd N9OGL (and) Todd Daugherty Jun 27 2003, 9:10 am "Malcolm McMahon" wrote in message ... - Show quoted text - Not if your licensed for that band......it's not my fault some thirty years in the future they change the band. And another thing is the fine in the future will probably be higher then what it is today. Todd -------------------------------------------------------------------------- this from alt.radio.pirate, in which Todd assists a new "pirate" in breaking the law. Note that Todd's media empire has expanded to cover three towns: n9ogl Jan 2 2001, 6:12 pm There are many places on the internet where you can find kits for shorwave transmitter kits. If you can't find it under shortwave kits try under amateur radio. The hams have a number ofshortwave bands. You can all sorts of Ham kits for the shortwave band. As for what's the best band I would say somewhere in the 6MHz range. 7Mhz is too crowded with hams and high power shortwave broadcast. Todd Daugherty N9OGL President LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION 107.9 F.M. LPFM Taylorville, Langleyville, Hewittville http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- from alt.radio.pirate, Todd explains that being a TV "pirate" isn't all it is cracked up to be: n9ogl Jul 27 2000, 12:00 am I agree with that.....I ran a ten watt pirate TV station there for a while. After 3 blocks there was no signal at all.I gave up trying to get it to go farther, so i'm going to try my luck with LPFM which the window is suppose to open at the end of august.maybe I'll have better luck with it. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL ------------------------------------------------------------------------- another from alt.radio.pirate. In this one, Todd's plans to up his "pirate" TV power to 100w. He uses an ATV transmitter converted to channel 14 and has issues over the use of three "fowl words": n9ogl Apr 7 2000, 12:00 am show options Hello John, I had to respond to your letter. You do have to run a lot of depending on your range it can run from 10 watts to 100 watts. The reason is because you are pushing a six MHz wide signal instead of a 10 KHz wide signal. My pirate TV station running at ten watts but we aren't getting the distance we really want so we are raising the power output to 100 watts. Television is also a little more expensive then radio because not only do you have a transmitter you also have cameras, props, amd other things to get a program going; unlike radio where you talk behind a mic. I like television because i've always wanted to get into it, and i had the transmitter so it made it simply for me to get into it. I'm using a ham ATV transmitter which i've converted to operate on channel 14. Public Access - I've dealt with public access for a long time as well as running my pirate TV station. Public Access is ok but, it depends on the area your in. For example, Taylorville where the Pirate TV station is operating also has a Public Access Channel but no one uses it for one simple reason. They allow anyone to uses the channel but if they don't like anything you say they will not air it. Simple put the Local government and the cable company has a tight control on the public access channel. This was another reason my station was put on the air. Don't get wrong it not just here that they local government have a tight control there are number of cities here in the united states that have the same problem and no one, not even the FCC will do nothing about it. Public access again is great if you are allowed to have creative control over your program and is not forced to be censored. One of the problems I've notice with public Access is the cable companies right to censor "indecent material" Obscene material according the Federal Courts is legal on public access. In other words you can have two people have sexual intercourse and it legal. But, if one is screaming Obscene language in the process they can't air it. The problem is this, What is really defined as obscene language. Here On of the programs I was trying to air on public access wasn't allowed to air because of three fowl words (two hell's and one dam) The cable company refused to air it; unless I did a "complete editing" of the content. (in other words they wanted the program to be edited in half because it contained "obscenity" anyway...there my two cents. I run a Low power pirate TV station and I'm not under anyones control execpt my own. (sorry for any grammar or spelling) Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV channel 14 Taylorville, Illinois (and this, where Todd gives us an inkling into his feelings about his town) n9ogl Apr 12 2000, 12:00 am Hi John, Yes, this town has a lot of dirty little secrets like it other towns around here (Springfield, Home of Human Rights and Decatur, Home of Black Liberation Radio). All have there little secrets. Here in Taylorville they like to suppress any information which needs to get out. That is why I will continue to fight for a right to be one tv. As i told the Chairman Bliley of the House Telecommunication Subcommittee. "I tried it your's and the NAB way (applied for a license) and found that they system is not on a level playing field" "So do want you want I will broadcast with or a license." I also gave Mr. Bliley my opinion on H.R. 3439 and some of the comment he and his colleague's suggested instead of LPFM and one of them was public access. I have gotten no reply so He probably threw it away. Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV Channel 14 Taylorville, Illinois ------------------------------------------------------------------------- another alt.radio.pirate posting in which Todd solicits programming on VHS tape: n9ogl Jan 22 2000, 12:00 am Hello, WLPS-TV pirate televsion channel 14 will remain on the air after the FCC due date in Febuary. WLPS is also looking for programming to fill up empty time slots. If you have a program send you VHS tape to the following address below send VHS video's to: Todd O'Dochartaigh 624 East Maincross St. Taylorville, Illinois 62568 all video's after being aired will be returned. A creator of video maintain's copyrights. There is no fee or anything just the cost to send it. Todd O'Dochartaigh Langley Park Studio /WLPS-TV (One responder asks if Todd accepts Beta or 3/4" U-matic tapes. Todd replies with the following) n9ogl Jan 24 2000, 12:00 am Hello, No just VHS but sometime in the near future we will be upgrading to S-VHS. Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV Chanel 14 Taylorville, Illinois (and) n9ogl Jan 7 2000, 12:00 am In article , wrote: wrote: Gawd. You rock man. Just watch you, FCC nigguhs read this newsgroup. How far does your signal travel? Height of the antenna? Hi, Not very far were covering most of the community with are signal and plan to get better coax and a little more power. the antenna is a cushcraft 440 beam antenna which has been tuned to the 470 MHz. band with a 13.0 db gain. The antenna height around 35 feet with the antenna pointing west. Up to five to six blocks you can pick it up with a set of "rabbit ears" while beyond that you need a outside antenna. We plan soon to buy a 100 watt amplifier to improve the signal. Todd O'Docharaigh WLPS-TV Channel 14 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This priceless gem comes from alt.sci.physics.new-theories: n9ogl Aug 29 1999, 12:00 am Hello To start, I would like to excused for the poor typing of this text. I'm not very good with grammar nor am I with spelling. 1. Objects and Time In the small community of Taylorville; where I live there once was a house known as Vanderveer House. It was once of course owned by the Vanderveer family. in the 1980's the house was totally destroyed and a Wal-Mart was put in it place. The question is this Is the Vanderveer house still there after being destroyed back in the 1980's The Answer is But it isn't in this "Time Frames". Basic physics dicatates "that no two object can occupy the same space at the same point in time" however the second part should go something like this "but, two object can occupy the same space at different points in time" What most people see as ghost or shadows from the past might be where the time frames are close enough that they can see both way. Time is a mesurement, which we measure by either clock or by "cause and effect" By cause and effect I'm of course refering to events with history. for example many people can remember events from their tenth birthday. So when you think of time or a object like a building or a love one perhaps you should look at it fourth dimensional. 2. Radio Waves Since the complete comercialization of radio the study of what radio is and how they travel remain somewhat a complexing mystery. Some say that radio waves travel through "aether" But what radio waves are is a fourth dimensional and interdimensional wave. Radio waves are fourth dimensional because they can transcend time. radio waves which travel at a speed of 3.00 X 10/8 ms-1 or 186,000 mps for a radio wave everything around it is going slow time has in fact slow down for it. radio I believe are also interdimensional because a radio wave is "wormhole" it way through not only time but space as well. radio wave could also punching through "parallel universes". if that the case you might ask why can't we hear messages from other Parallel worlds? because their Qunta is different to are universe. just because some is one way in one universe doesn't by no mean make it work in another universe. So we can't them nor can they hear us. 3. life on other planets i have heard from both sides about life on "other planets" and i've deiced to write on it. there is some theory about what is need for life on other planets. well throw that away. it don't mean squat. humans try to embelish this idea on how life is formed and how it is to operated on other planets. all the theorist on this little planet can come up with all the little theories about that they want. the bottom line is that human are basing other life on other planet on are own worthless existance Don't; life through evoultion can adapt it self to a enviroment without the need of air, water, food or sunlight. well that's it for now....some of theses idea i've been working on for a long time i have more stranger ideas that maybe sometime in the future I will post. What do you think??? Again sorry for any spelling or poor grammar. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL "JUST BECAUSE YOU SEE SOMETHING AS REALITY DOESN'T MAKE IT REALITY. JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN'T FIND SOMETHING THAT ISN'T REAL DOSEN'T MEAN IT'S NOT REAL IT SIMPLY MEANS THAT YOU ARE LOOKING TO HARD" Todd O'Dochartaigh (1983) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- this from alt.radio.broadcasting: n9ogl Mar 5 1999, 12:00 am HELLO, I just recieved word that Senator Billy Tauzin of Louisana wrote Billy Kennard saying no to micropower radio....according to report Billy is worryabout interference from Microbroadcasters with exisiting station...find the whole report at http://www.arnewsline.com/ to me billy should get the N.A.B. mouth off of his body organ and serve the People not some Monopolistic power hungry organization....And the FCC should do the same. Todd N9OGL AMATEUR/COMMERCIAL OPERATOR SUPPORTER OF MICROPOWER BROADCAST /ANTI-N.A.B. /ANTI BILLY TAUZIN ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here's some sparkling interplay between Todd, the movie pirate and someone who calls himself "Just Allan" in alt.kazaa: Just Allan Jul 15 2003, 1:55 am Has anyone downloaded the latest matrix movie - and got it to play? I converted the *.dat file to mpg, and it won't work... Any help appreciated! Todd Daugherty Aug 5 2003, 4:52 pm I have and it works great...go download VLC it will pay it Todd ------------------------------------------------------------------------- from alt.radio.pirate: daughert Apr 29 2001, 11:44 am GG wrote: "Johnny Neutron" What does the fact that it's illegal to discuss "political and patriotic" topics on Ham radio tell you? Please site the section of Part 97, the FCC rules that govern amateur radio, that supports this claim. I have been a ham for forty years and have heard and participated in many such discussion and I have never heard of anyone being cited for such. I would like to see this rule. There was at one time a "gentleman's agreement" not to discuss controversial subjects, but if you listen on the ham bands I think you will hear plenty of political and patriotic discussion going on. It isn't a rule but you got nazi's in the FCC like Hollingsworth that thinks that type of discussion is best served either through the internet or LPFM Todd N9OGL ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This series, from alt.radio.pirate is classic Todd: daughert Apr 2 2001, 6:10 pm Beretta wrote: On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 19:49:18 -0500, daughert wrote: WHERE'S THAT HOMEPAGE THAT YOU CAN FAX JOHN MCCAIN TODD Your caps lock key seems to be broken. I suggest you replace your keyboard PGP Key: 0x194DF369 Fingerprint: B777 DB2A FB11 55FA 509D CE63 F3DE D665 194D F369 NO I'M F--KING ****ED OFF AND RIGHT NOW YOU DON'T REALLY WANT TO F--K WITH ME. I'M GOING TO EMAIL OR FAX THAT SON OF A BITCH MCCAIN AND TELL THAT DUMB F--K OFF ALONG WITH THOSE BUTTF--KERS FCC....NO ONE F--K'S ME OUT OF A LICENSE FOR THE SEVENTH TIME TODD (and) daughert Apr 2 2001, 7:24 pm here the letter I sent to McCain..... Subject: LPFM Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:15:17 -0500 From: daughert To: Senator McCain, I am writing you in regards to the FCC New Report and Order dealing with LPFM (FCC O1-100) in it my groups application was dismissed because on form 318 was said yes to a question dealing with unlicensed broadcast; which I will talk about in a minute. The reason we did this by saying yes was simply put to tell the truth and not perform purgery which is a Federal offence. The reason we said yes is a looong story. It started in the late ninties. I had appplied for a Low Power Television license. I applied for this license six times and each time I applied my application was returned sometimes for the dumbest things like they sent one back because They said I would have to have FAA approval for my tower. The tower was only 60 ft up....under FAA and FCC anything below 200ft doesn't require FAA approval. the next was I had to pay the licensing FEE although my group is a Non-profit orginization and it was stated on the application that it was. Then there was the main thing.....that I didn't file it through a "filling windows" yet when I asked when it was they wouldn't tell me and to top it off they were granting construction permits for Low Power Television. bottom line they didn't want a small orginization like us to have a license. So after applying six times for a licenses for Low power TV and said the hell with it and began running a low power TV station without a license. My signal although was putting out 10 watts only went one to two street blocks. I did it simply because the FCC wouldn't license me and because some people and congress don't care. I broadcast for two months december and january after that my transmitter went out. I was never caught nor fined by the FCC yet these new ruling states simply that it dosen't matter. well Senator I come to the conclusion that the FCC once again has screwed me and my group out of a license and like always I type these letters to a group of congress that don't seem to care. So my group and I are going to go on the air without a license because were sick of being screwed by the FCC, were sick of doing the hard work to fill out thoses applications and we might even sue the FCC and you all for all trouble and trama they've caused me and my group Todd E Daugherty N9OGL CEO/PRESIDENT Langley Park Telecommunication (and, after some commented on his lack of language skills, our state-tested-high-IQ pirate broadcaster wrote) daughert Apr 3 2001, 3:58 pm hey f--k you all I have a Learning disability so F--K YOU ASSHOLES!!!! 624 East Maincross Taylorville, Illinois 62568 AMATEUR OPERATOR, RESTRICED PERMIT OPERATOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------- this from alt.radio.broadcasting: n9ogl Dec 18 2000, 9:12 am ....At any rate I know I got F--K out of a license, again for the seventh time. So I'm done messing with the FCC and going back to do what I do best Pirating....So much for the so called "Legal way" The Congress and this hell hole we call a country can kiss my Ass and to that dumbass Eddie Fritts I hope someday you choke on you own jucies and die! As for the FCC well boys I done being F--ked by you so S--K IT!!!! LATER Todd O'Dohartaigh CEO/PRESIDENT Langley Park Telecommunication ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here's another from alt.sci.physics.new-theories n9ogl May 28 2000, 12:00 am Hello, There has in the past about time travel and the possiblity of going back and forth in time. Some scientist (and in my humble opinion i uses that term lossly) believe that traveling down a black hole or through a black hole could lead to the past, the future or perhaps parallel universes. that's if you can get pass the gravational field of a black hole not to mention the huge amounts of radiation a black hole omittes. Some suggest going faster then the speed of light (FTL) after all a takon particle can go faster the speed of light. but, alast, this idea is not thing but that a idea. I myself have come up with many ideas on the possiblity of Time Travel. One of these ideas is so possible that with the techonolgy today makes it very possible. I believe we will never be able to time travel areselves but, i beleive it is possible to send a message to the future by means of the combination of computer techonolgy and radio communication. the idea is simple take a computer hook it to a wireless modem and have it sit on a given radio frequency.wireless modems called Terminal Node Controls can be set to a certian time frame to beacon.so you set it to beacon 30 years into the future this instance tiem travel to the future. it will be however up tothe future how to respond back. Todd ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I guess Todd never thought of writing a letter in the present time and leaving it lying around for thirty years. Perhaps he'd even be around to open it and to be able to read the words of a Todd thirty years in the past. He'd still have the problem of how to respond to the Todd thirty years in the past. That's Part II of the report from fantasy land. Is there anyone still wondering why Todd wasn't issued a license for a broadcast station? Dave Heil |
Dave Heil wrote:
More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives: from alt.sci.time-travel Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up a computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty years someone would reply back. comments? Todd Daugherty N9OGL Amateur Radio Operator As absolutely assinine as this is, did he HAVE to use his callsign and "Amateur Radio Operator" in the signature line? Does he not think that if this would have worked, we would have already gotten messages from "the future"...?!?! Do ANY "time travel" proponents not think that if time travel worked, we wouldn't have seen some evidence of it already? (SNIPPAGE) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- this from alt.radio.pirate, in which Todd assists a new "pirate" in breaking the law. Note that Todd's media empire has expanded to cover three towns: n9ogl Jan 2 2001, 6:12 pm There are many places on the internet where you can find kits for shorwave transmitter kits. If you can't find it under shortwave kits try under amateur radio. The hams have a number ofshortwave bands. You can all sorts of Ham kits for the shortwave band. As for what's the best band I would say somewhere in the 6MHz range. 7Mhz is too crowded with hams and high power shortwave broadcast. Todd Daugherty N9OGL President LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION 107.9 F.M. LPFM Taylorville, Langleyville, Hewittville http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws.... K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?! from alt.radio.pirate, Todd explains that being a TV "pirate" isn't all it is cracked up to be: n9ogl Jul 27 2000, 12:00 am I agree with that.....I ran a ten watt pirate TV station there for a while. After 3 blocks there was no signal at all.I gave up trying to get it to go farther, so i'm going to try my luck with LPFM which the window is suppose to open at the end of august.maybe I'll have better luck with it. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Maybe someone in "alt.pirate" looked up "N9OGL" and realized that he was lying about his name...Then wonder what else he's lying about. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- another from alt.radio.pirate. In this one, Todd's plans to up his "pirate" TV power to 100w. He uses an ATV transmitter converted to channel 14 and has issues over the use of three "fowl words": n9ogl Apr 7 2000, 12:00 am show options Hello John, I had to respond to your letter. You do have to run a lot of depending on your range it can run from 10 watts to 100 watts. The reason is because you are pushing a six MHz wide signal instead of a 10 KHz wide signal. My pirate TV station running at ten watts but we aren't getting the distance we really want so we are raising the power output to 100 watts. Admission of violation of FCC rules and regulations...and he wonders why he's not a broadcast licensee.... Another question for K2ASP...Phil, isn't this yet ANOTHER disqualifying act? Can't we bring this to the Commission's attention and see if we can't get him off of Amateur Radio too...??? (Some more snippage to....) Here On of the programs I was trying to air on public access wasn't allowed to air because of three fowl words (two hell's and one dam) The cable company refused to air it; unless I did a "complete editing" of the content. (in other words they wanted the program to be edited in half because it contained "obscenity" anyway...there my two cents. I run a Low power pirate TV station and I'm not under anyones control execpt my own. (sorry for any grammar or spelling) Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..... His motivation for getting on the air is (1) to watch people swearing while having sex, (2) use profanity himself (even spelled wrong...Nothing more humiliating that an ignorant man trying to express himself profanely that can't even spell it correctly!) (3) Expresses his complete lack of belief that just because he is operating illegally that he's not responsible to federal regulations Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV channel 14 Taylorville, Illinois Then can't even spell his own last name correctly. (More snippage.....) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This priceless gem comes from alt.sci.physics.new-theories: n9ogl Aug 29 1999, 12:00 am Hello To start, I would like to excused for the poor typing of this text. I'm not very good with grammar nor am I with spelling. 1. Objects and Time In the small community of Taylorville; where I live there once was a house known as Vanderveer House. It was once of course owned by the Vanderveer family. in the 1980's the house was totally destroyed and a Wal-Mart was put in it place. The question is this Is the Vanderveer house still there after being destroyed back in the 1980's The Answer is But it isn't in this "Time Frames". Basic physics dicatates "that no two object can occupy the same space at the same point in time" however the second part should go something like this "but, two object can occupy the same space at different points in time" What most people see as ghost or shadows from the past might be where the time frames are close enough that they can see both way. Time is a mesurement, which we measure by either clock or by "cause and effect" By cause and effect I'm of course refering to events with history. for example many people can remember events from their tenth birthday. So when you think of time or a object like a building or a love one perhaps you should look at it fourth dimensional. This isn't even bad science fiction, let alone "physics"..... 2. Radio Waves Since the complete comercialization of radio the study of what radio is and how they travel remain somewhat a complexing mystery. Only Todd would think that radio wave propagation is some sort of "complexing mystery". Some say that radio waves travel through "aether" No, some don't. At least not since the 1920's. But what radio waves are is a fourth dimensional and interdimensional wave. He should be slapped just for the grammatical abuses. Radio waves are fourth dimensional because they can transcend time. radio waves which travel at a speed of 3.00 X 10/8 ms-1 or 186,000 mps for a radio wave everything around it is going slow time has in fact slow down for it. radio I believe are also interdimensional because a radio wave is "wormhole" it way through not only time but space as well. Living IN a "wormhole" probably gives one the opinion that anything that you can't reach out and touch is from a wormhole too. radio wave could also punching through "parallel universes". if that the case you might ask why can't we hear messages from other Parallel worlds? because their Qunta is different to are universe. just because some is one way in one universe doesn't by no mean make it work in another universe. So we can't them nor can they hear us. "Qunta"...?!?! "are universe"...?!?! 3. life on other planets i have heard from both sides about life on "other planets" and i've deiced to write on it. You NEED to "deice", Toddie! Maybe soon? there is some theory about what is need for life on other planets. well throw that away. it don't mean squat. humans try to embelish this idea on how life is formed and how it is to operated on other planets. all the theorist on this little planet can come up with all the little theories about that they want. the bottom line is that human are basing other life on other planet on are own worthless existance Don't; life through evoultion can adapt it self to a enviroment without the need of air, water, food or sunlight. BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W H A T A M O R O N ! ! ! ! ! ! ! well that's it for now....some of theses idea i've been working on for a long time i have more stranger ideas that maybe sometime in the future I will post. What do you think??? It get's S T R A N G E R ?!?!?!?!?! GOD FORBID! Again sorry for any spelling or poor grammar. Lessee...This piece was dated August 1999. He knew THEN he had spelling and grammar deficiencies, yet six years later he's not done a single thing about it! Snippage again... If moronic behaviour was transmissible, I'd be lobotomizing myself about now! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This series, from alt.radio.pirate is classic Todd: daughert Apr 2 2001, 6:10 pm Beretta wrote: On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 19:49:18 -0500, daughert wrote: WHERE'S THAT HOMEPAGE THAT YOU CAN FAX JOHN MCCAIN TODD Your caps lock key seems to be broken. I suggest you replace your keyboard PGP Key: 0x194DF369 Fingerprint: B777 DB2A FB11 55FA 509D CE63 F3DE D665 194D F369 NO I'M F--KING ****ED OFF AND RIGHT NOW YOU DON'T REALLY WANT TO F--K WITH ME. I'M GOING TO EMAIL OR FAX THAT SON OF A BITCH MCCAIN AND TELL THAT DUMB F--K OFF ALONG WITH THOSE BUTTF--KERS FCC....NO ONE F--K'S ME OUT OF A LICENSE FOR THE SEVENTH TIME TODD (and) daughert Apr 2 2001, 7:24 pm here the letter I sent to McCain..... Subject: LPFM Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:15:17 -0500 From: daughert To: Senator McCain, I am writing you in regards to the FCC New Report and Order dealing with LPFM (FCC O1-100) in it my groups application was dismissed because on form 318 was said yes to a question dealing with unlicensed broadcast; which I will talk about in a minute. The reason we did this by saying yes was simply put to tell the truth and not perform purgery which is a Federal offence. He's functionally illiterate, admits to violating federal law, and sends it to one of the most powerful Senators in the United States. I'm impressed. The reason we said yes is a looong story. Uhhhhhhhh...could it be because the proper answer WAS "yes"...?!?! How long a story could that be? It started in the late ninties. I had appplied for a Low Power Television license. I applied for this license six times and each time I applied my application was returned sometimes for the dumbest things like they sent one back because They said I would have to have FAA approval for my tower. The tower was only 60 ft up....under FAA and FCC anything below 200ft doesn't require FAA approval. Unless you're within certain distances of other FAA or FCC facilities. the next was I had to pay the licensing FEE although my group is a Non-profit orginization and it was stated on the application that it was. Perhaps it had sometig to do with the lack of articles of organization and proper IRS documentation of non-profit status...?!?! Then there was the main thing.....that I didn't file it through a "filling windows" yet when I asked when it was they wouldn't tell me and to top it off they were granting construction permits for Low Power Television. bottom line they didn't want a small orginization like us to have a license. I guess it didn't have anything to do with filing incorrectly, failing to meet licensure criteria, failure to meet technical criteria, and complete lack of faith that you'd be a credible and trustworthy licensee...?!?! So after applying six times for a licenses for Low power TV and said the hell with it and began running a low power TV station without a license. Uhhhhh...Yup! You go R I G H T A H E A D and tell that Senator that you violated federal law and then expect him to come to your aid! My signal although was putting out 10 watts only went one to two street blocks. I did it simply because the FCC wouldn't license me and because some people and congress don't care. I broadcast for two months december and january after that my transmitter went out. Thank God for small favors, eh? I was never caught nor fined by the FCC yet these new ruling states simply that it dosen't matter. well Senator I come to the conclusion that the FCC once again has screwed me and my group out of a license and like always I type these letters to a group of congress that don't seem to care. LOVE IT! All of the above and THEN he accuses the Senator of being apathetic! I know that would motivate ME to help him out! So my group and I are going to go on the air without a license because were sick of being screwed by the FCC, were sick of doing the hard work to fill out thoses applications and we might even sue the FCC and you all for all trouble and trama they've caused me and my group Todd E Daugherty N9OGL CEO/PRESIDENT Langley Park Telecommunication (and, after some commented on his lack of language skills, our state-tested-high-IQ pirate broadcaster wrote) daughert Apr 3 2001, 3:58 pm hey f--k you all I have a Learning disability so F--K YOU ASSHOLES!!!! 624 East Maincross Taylorville, Illinois 62568 AMATEUR OPERATOR, RESTRICED PERMIT OPERATOR Like I said.... WHAT IS IT with Illinois and functionally illiterate clods...?!?! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- this from alt.radio.broadcasting: n9ogl Dec 18 2000, 9:12 am ...At any rate I know I got F--K out of a license, again for the seventh time. So I'm done messing with the FCC and going back to do what I do best Pirating....So much for the so called "Legal way" The Congress and this hell hole we call a country can kiss my Ass and to that dumbass Eddie Fritts I hope someday you choke on you own jucies and die! As for the FCC well boys I done being F--ked by you so S--K IT!!!! LATER Todd O'Dohartaigh CEO/PRESIDENT Langley Park Telecommunication Guess that's how we came to be sooooooooooooooooooooooooo lucky as to be violated by this junior wannabe broadcaster... And he wonders why, after all of the profanities, threats, and admissions of guilt to violations of the Communications Act tha the FCC won't "reconsider" his applicaitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here's another from alt.sci.physics.new-theories n9ogl May 28 2000, 12:00 am Hello, There has in the past about time travel and the possiblity of going back and forth in time. Some scientist (and in my humble opinion i uses that term lossly) believe that traveling down a black hole or through a black hole could lead to the past, the future or perhaps parallel universes. that's if you can get pass the gravational field of a black hole not to mention the huge amounts of radiation a black hole omittes. Some suggest going faster then the speed of light (FTL) after all a takon particle can go faster the speed of light. but, alast, this idea is not thing but that a idea. I myself have come up with many ideas on the possiblity of Time Travel. One of these ideas is so possible that with the techonolgy today makes it very possible. I believe we will never be able to time travel areselves but, i beleive it is possible to send a message to the future by means of the combination of computer techonolgy and radio communication. the idea is simple take a computer hook it to a wireless modem and have it sit on a given radio frequency.wireless modems called Terminal Node Controls can be set to a certian time frame to beacon.so you set it to beacon 30 years into the future this instance tiem travel to the future. it will be however up tothe future how to respond back. Todd ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I guess Todd never thought of writing a letter in the present time and leaving it lying around for thirty years. Perhaps he'd even be around to open it and to be able to read the words of a Todd thirty years in the past. He'd still have the problem of how to respond to the Todd thirty years in the past. That's Part II of the report from fantasy land. Is there anyone still wondering why Todd wasn't issued a license for a broadcast station? Not me! And if I can talk the Mrs out of it, I am going to send each of the Commissioners a dozen roses and a letter of apology on bahalf of all Amateurs to Senator McCain. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
On 23 Mar 2005 10:10:09 -0800, K4YZ wrote:
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws.... K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?! Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee. Admission of violation of FCC rules and regulations...and he wonders why he's not a broadcast licensee.... Another question for K2ASP...Phil, isn't this yet ANOTHER disqualifying act? More "character" issues.... -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:04:29 GMT, Dave Heil quoted Todd as posting:
Obscene material according the Federal Courts is legal on public access. Obscene material is unprotected speech (therefore not "legal" on cable - see 18 USC s. 1468). As contrasted to broadcast material (18 USC s. 1464) Section 1468 does not proscribe indecent material, which the courts have held "semi" protected i.e. subject to FCC time-of-broadcast regulation (see Pacifica v FCC). Todd mixed that one up again..... Expect that sometime in the near future, Section 1468 will be amended to proscribe indecency by cable or satellite delivery, again subject to FCC time-of-broadcast regulation. That will create a "level playing field". -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane |
Again you are violating of Copyright Law
Todd N9OGL |
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws....
K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?! Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee. Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee What I was refering to was PART 15 DEVICES. Todd N9OGL |
Yes, my bad, I meant Indecent material, (see Denver Area Consortium Vs
FCC 1996) Todd N9OGL |
N9OGL wrote:
Again you are violating of Copyright Law You are as unknowledgeable about copyright law as you are about communications law. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Again you are violating of Copyright Law You are as unknowledgeable about copyright law as you are about communications law. Dave K8MN I wouldn't bet on it if I was you....I hold a number of copyrights Todd N9OGL |
N9OGL wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Again you are violating of Copyright Law You are as unknowledgeable about copyright law as you are about communications law. I wouldn't bet on it if I was you.... I'd bet the ranch on it, Todd. It is possible for anyone to copyright original material. It is not possible to copyright original material posted to a newsgroup. I hold a number of copyrights I'll bet you've held some copyrights. You've likely held "Reader's Digest" and "QST". You have apparently have copyrights which aren't copyrighted and inventions which haven't been invented. You know all about packet BBS software but you don't know how to set it up. Oh, and you're the president and CEO of a broadcasting company which has only pirate outlets. Are there other employees or are you the president, CEO and janitor? Do you have offices or is your company headquartered in a bedroom in your parents home? You seem to have a tough time with reality, Todd. Dave K8MN |
Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: Again you are violating of Copyright Law You are as unknowledgeable about copyright law as you are about communications law. I wouldn't bet on it if I was you.... I'd bet the ranch on it, Todd. It is possible for anyone to copyright original material. It is not possible to copyright original material posted to a newsgroup. I hold a number of copyrights I'll bet you've held some copyrights. You've likely held "Reader's Digest" and "QST". You have apparently have copyrights which aren't copyrighted and inventions which haven't been invented. You know all about packet BBS software but you don't know how to set it up. Oh, and you're the president and CEO of a broadcasting company which has only pirate outlets. Are there other employees or are you the president, CEO and janitor? Do you have offices or is your company headquartered in a bedroom in your parents home? You seem to have a tough time with reality, Todd. Dave K8MN http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...tion/about.htm States that a ham with a vanity call of N9FU (no profanity intended) established this pirate broadcasting company with him! |
N9OGL wrote: Again you are violating of Copyright Law Who's violating what, bugbrain? You won't cite your attributions, so who's to tell who you are talling to...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
N9OGL wrote: And didn't cite attributiosn...AGAIN! WHAT AN IDIOT! (K4YZ)...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws.... K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?! (K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee. (K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee What I was refering to was PART 15 DEVICES. BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! "Mr. #### the FCC" is now snivveling away under the scrutiny of a REAL FCC attorney! Your "Part 15 devices" do NOT run more than 100mw, Todd! Every one of your posts cites devices running at least 10 watts with your expressed intent to go to 100 or more! C O W A R D ! ! ! ! ! ! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: And didn't cite attributiosn...AGAIN! WHAT AN IDIOT! (K4YZ)...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws.... K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?! (K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee. (K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee What I was refering to was PART 15 DEVICES. BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! "Mr. #### the FCC" is now snivveling away under the scrutiny of a REAL FCC attorney! Your "Part 15 devices" do NOT run more than 100mw, Todd! Every one of your posts cites devices running at least 10 watts with your expressed intent to go to 100 or more! Accually, Part 15 depends on Frequency, 100mw can be ran on the AM broadcast Band, on 160 to 190 I believe is 1 watt, at 13MHZ part 15 is 10,000 Microvolts per meter at 30 meters, on the FM Broadcast Band it 250 microvolts per meter @ 30 meters, and on Some frequencies it's high on other's it low. for more information goto: http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf Todd N9OGL C O W A R D ! ! ! ! ! ! Steve, K4YZ |
Dave Heil wrote:
More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives: from alt.sci.time-travel Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up a computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty years someone would reply back. comments? Todd Daugherty N9OGL Sounds more like stuff that a 10 year old would think up. |
K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives: from alt.sci.time-travel Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up a computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty years someone would reply back. comments? Todd Daugherty N9OGL Amateur Radio Operator As absolutely assinine as this is, did he HAVE to use his callsign and "Amateur Radio Operator" in the signature line? Does he not think that if this would have worked, we would have already gotten messages from "the future"...?!?! Do ANY "time travel" proponents not think that if time travel worked, we wouldn't have seen some evidence of it already? (SNIPPAGE) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- this from alt.radio.pirate, in which Todd assists a new "pirate" in breaking the law. Note that Todd's media empire has expanded to cover three towns: n9ogl Jan 2 2001, 6:12 pm There are many places on the internet where you can find kits for shorwave transmitter kits. If you can't find it under shortwave kits try under amateur radio. The hams have a number ofshortwave bands. You can all sorts of Ham kits for the shortwave band. As for what's the best band I would say somewhere in the 6MHz range. 7Mhz is too crowded with hams and high power shortwave broadcast. Todd Daugherty N9OGL President LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION 107.9 F.M. LPFM Taylorville, Langleyville, Hewittville http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws.... K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?! from alt.radio.pirate, Todd explains that being a TV "pirate" isn't all it is cracked up to be: n9ogl Jul 27 2000, 12:00 am I agree with that.....I ran a ten watt pirate TV station there for a while. After 3 blocks there was no signal at all.I gave up trying to get it to go farther, so i'm going to try my luck with LPFM which the window is suppose to open at the end of august.maybe I'll have better luck with it. Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL Maybe someone in "alt.pirate" looked up "N9OGL" and realized that he was lying about his name...Then wonder what else he's lying about. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- another from alt.radio.pirate. In this one, Todd's plans to up his "pirate" TV power to 100w. He uses an ATV transmitter converted to channel 14 and has issues over the use of three "fowl words": n9ogl Apr 7 2000, 12:00 am show options Hello John, I had to respond to your letter. You do have to run a lot of depending on your range it can run from 10 watts to 100 watts. The reason is because you are pushing a six MHz wide signal instead of a 10 KHz wide signal. My pirate TV station running at ten watts but we aren't getting the distance we really want so we are raising the power output to 100 watts. Admission of violation of FCC rules and regulations...and he wonders why he's not a broadcast licensee.... Another question for K2ASP...Phil, isn't this yet ANOTHER disqualifying act? Can't we bring this to the Commission's attention and see if we can't get him off of Amateur Radio too...??? (Some more snippage to....) Here On of the programs I was trying to air on public access wasn't allowed to air because of three fowl words (two hell's and one dam) The cable company refused to air it; unless I did a "complete editing" of the content. (in other words they wanted the program to be edited in half because it contained "obscenity" anyway...there my two cents. I run a Low power pirate TV station and I'm not under anyones control execpt my own. (sorry for any grammar or spelling) Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..... His motivation for getting on the air is (1) to watch people swearing while having sex, (2) use profanity himself (even spelled wrong...Nothing more humiliating that an ignorant man trying to express himself profanely that can't even spell it correctly!) (3) Expresses his complete lack of belief that just because he is operating illegally that he's not responsible to federal regulations Todd O'Dochartaigh WLPS-TV channel 14 Taylorville, Illinois Then can't even spell his own last name correctly. (More snippage.....) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This priceless gem comes from alt.sci.physics.new-theories: n9ogl Aug 29 1999, 12:00 am Hello To start, I would like to excused for the poor typing of this text. I'm not very good with grammar nor am I with spelling. 1. Objects and Time In the small community of Taylorville; where I live there once was a house known as Vanderveer House. It was once of course owned by the Vanderveer family. in the 1980's the house was totally destroyed and a Wal-Mart was put in it place. The question is this Is the Vanderveer house still there after being destroyed back in the 1980's The Answer is But it isn't in this "Time Frames". Basic physics dicatates "that no two object can occupy the same space at the same point in time" however the second part should go something like this "but, two object can occupy the same space at different points in time" What most people see as ghost or shadows from the past might be where the time frames are close enough that they can see both way. Time is a mesurement, which we measure by either clock or by "cause and effect" By cause and effect I'm of course refering to events with history. for example many people can remember events from their tenth birthday. So when you think of time or a object like a building or a love one perhaps you should look at it fourth dimensional. This isn't even bad science fiction, let alone "physics"..... 2. Radio Waves Since the complete comercialization of radio the study of what radio is and how they travel remain somewhat a complexing mystery. Only Todd would think that radio wave propagation is some sort of "complexing mystery". Some say that radio waves travel through "aether" No, some don't. At least not since the 1920's. But what radio waves are is a fourth dimensional and interdimensional wave. He should be slapped just for the grammatical abuses. Radio waves are fourth dimensional because they can transcend time. radio waves which travel at a speed of 3.00 X 10/8 ms-1 or 186,000 mps for a radio wave everything around it is going slow time has in fact slow down for it. radio I believe are also interdimensional because a radio wave is "wormhole" it way through not only time but space as well. Living IN a "wormhole" probably gives one the opinion that anything that you can't reach out and touch is from a wormhole too. radio wave could also punching through "parallel universes". if that the case you might ask why can't we hear messages from other Parallel worlds? because their Qunta is different to are universe. just because some is one way in one universe doesn't by no mean make it work in another universe. So we can't them nor can they hear us. "Qunta"...?!?! "are universe"...?!?! 3. life on other planets i have heard from both sides about life on "other planets" and i've deiced to write on it. You NEED to "deice", Toddie! Maybe soon? there is some theory about what is need for life on other planets. well throw that away. it don't mean squat. humans try to embelish this idea on how life is formed and how it is to operated on other planets. all the theorist on this little planet can come up with all the little theories about that they want. the bottom line is that human are basing other life on other planet on are own worthless existance Don't; life through evoultion can adapt it self to a enviroment without the need of air, water, food or sunlight. BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W H A T A M O R O N ! ! ! ! ! ! ! well that's it for now....some of theses idea i've been working on for a long time i have more stranger ideas that maybe sometime in the future I will post. What do you think??? It get's S T R A N G E R ?!?!?!?!?! GOD FORBID! Again sorry for any spelling or poor grammar. Lessee...This piece was dated August 1999. He knew THEN he had spelling and grammar deficiencies, yet six years later he's not done a single thing about it! Snippage again... If moronic behaviour was transmissible, I'd be lobotomizing myself about now! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This series, from alt.radio.pirate is classic Todd: daughert Apr 2 2001, 6:10 pm Beretta wrote: On Mon, 02 Apr 2001 19:49:18 -0500, daughert wrote: WHERE'S THAT HOMEPAGE THAT YOU CAN FAX JOHN MCCAIN TODD Your caps lock key seems to be broken. I suggest you replace your keyboard PGP Key: 0x194DF369 Fingerprint: B777 DB2A FB11 55FA 509D CE63 F3DE D665 194D F369 NO I'M F--KING ****ED OFF AND RIGHT NOW YOU DON'T REALLY WANT TO F--K WITH ME. I'M GOING TO EMAIL OR FAX THAT SON OF A BITCH MCCAIN AND TELL THAT DUMB F--K OFF ALONG WITH THOSE BUTTF--KERS FCC....NO ONE F--K'S ME OUT OF A LICENSE FOR THE SEVENTH TIME TODD (and) daughert Apr 2 2001, 7:24 pm here the letter I sent to McCain..... Subject: LPFM Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 21:15:17 -0500 From: daughert To: Senator McCain, I am writing you in regards to the FCC New Report and Order dealing with LPFM (FCC O1-100) in it my groups application was dismissed because on form 318 was said yes to a question dealing with unlicensed broadcast; which I will talk about in a minute. The reason we did this by saying yes was simply put to tell the truth and not perform purgery which is a Federal offence. He's functionally illiterate, admits to violating federal law, and sends it to one of the most powerful Senators in the United States. I'm impressed. The reason we said yes is a looong story. Uhhhhhhhh...could it be because the proper answer WAS "yes"...?!?! How long a story could that be? It started in the late ninties. I had appplied for a Low Power Television license. I applied for this license six times and each time I applied my application was returned sometimes for the dumbest things like they sent one back because They said I would have to have FAA approval for my tower. The tower was only 60 ft up....under FAA and FCC anything below 200ft doesn't require FAA approval. Unless you're within certain distances of other FAA or FCC facilities. the next was I had to pay the licensing FEE although my group is a Non-profit orginization and it was stated on the application that it was. Perhaps it had sometig to do with the lack of articles of organization and proper IRS documentation of non-profit status...?!?! Then there was the main thing.....that I didn't file it through a "filling windows" yet when I asked when it was they wouldn't tell me and to top it off they were granting construction permits for Low Power Television. bottom line they didn't want a small orginization like us to have a license. I guess it didn't have anything to do with filing incorrectly, failing to meet licensure criteria, failure to meet technical criteria, and complete lack of faith that you'd be a credible and trustworthy licensee...?!?! So after applying six times for a licenses for Low power TV and said the hell with it and began running a low power TV station without a license. Uhhhhh...Yup! You go R I G H T A H E A D and tell that Senator that you violated federal law and then expect him to come to your aid! My signal although was putting out 10 watts only went one to two street blocks. I did it simply because the FCC wouldn't license me and because some people and congress don't care. I broadcast for two months december and january after that my transmitter went out. Thank God for small favors, eh? I was never caught nor fined by the FCC yet these new ruling states simply that it dosen't matter. well Senator I come to the conclusion that the FCC once again has screwed me and my group out of a license and like always I type these letters to a group of congress that don't seem to care. LOVE IT! All of the above and THEN he accuses the Senator of being apathetic! I know that would motivate ME to help him out! So my group and I are going to go on the air without a license because were sick of being screwed by the FCC, were sick of doing the hard work to fill out thoses applications and we might even sue the FCC and you all for all trouble and trama they've caused me and my group Todd E Daugherty N9OGL CEO/PRESIDENT Langley Park Telecommunication (and, after some commented on his lack of language skills, our state-tested-high-IQ pirate broadcaster wrote) daughert Apr 3 2001, 3:58 pm hey f--k you all I have a Learning disability so F--K YOU ASSHOLES!!!! 624 East Maincross Taylorville, Illinois 62568 AMATEUR OPERATOR, RESTRICED PERMIT OPERATOR Like I said.... WHAT IS IT with Illinois and functionally illiterate clods...?!?! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- this from alt.radio.broadcasting: n9ogl Dec 18 2000, 9:12 am ...At any rate I know I got F--K out of a license, again for the seventh time. So I'm done messing with the FCC and going back to do what I do best Pirating....So much for the so called "Legal way" The Congress and this hell hole we call a country can kiss my Ass and to that dumbass Eddie Fritts I hope someday you choke on you own jucies and die! As for the FCC well boys I done being F--ked by you so S--K IT!!!! LATER Todd O'Dohartaigh CEO/PRESIDENT Langley Park Telecommunication Guess that's how we came to be sooooooooooooooooooooooooo lucky as to be violated by this junior wannabe broadcaster... And he wonders why, after all of the profanities, threats, and admissions of guilt to violations of the Communications Act tha the FCC won't "reconsider" his applicaitions. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here's another from alt.sci.physics.new-theories n9ogl May 28 2000, 12:00 am Hello, There has in the past about time travel and the possiblity of going back and forth in time. Some scientist (and in my humble opinion i uses that term lossly) believe that traveling down a black hole or through a black hole could lead to the past, the future or perhaps parallel universes. that's if you can get pass the gravational field of a black hole not to mention the huge amounts of radiation a black hole omittes. Some suggest going faster then the speed of light (FTL) after all a takon particle can go faster the speed of light. but, alast, this idea is not thing but that a idea. I myself have come up with many ideas on the possiblity of Time Travel. One of these ideas is so possible that with the techonolgy today makes it very possible. I believe we will never be able to time travel areselves but, i beleive it is possible to send a message to the future by means of the combination of computer techonolgy and radio communication. the idea is simple take a computer hook it to a wireless modem and have it sit on a given radio frequency.wireless modems called Terminal Node Controls can be set to a certian time frame to beacon.so you set it to beacon 30 years into the future this instance tiem travel to the future. it will be however up tothe future how to respond back. Todd ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I guess Todd never thought of writing a letter in the present time and leaving it lying around for thirty years. Perhaps he'd even be around to open it and to be able to read the words of a Todd thirty years in the past. He'd still have the problem of how to respond to the Todd thirty years in the past. That's Part II of the report from fantasy land. Is there anyone still wondering why Todd wasn't issued a license for a broadcast station? Not me! And if I can talk the Mrs out of it, I am going to send each of the Commissioners a dozen roses and a letter of apology on bahalf of all Amateurs to Senator McCain. 73 Steve, K4YZ Time travel isn't possible, if it were someone from the future would have come back in time to tell us about it. |
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: And didn't cite attributiosn...AGAIN! WHAT AN IDIOT! (K4YZ)...Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm....Helping another violate federal laws.... K2ASP, isn't that a disqualifying act for licensure...?!?! (K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee. (K2ASP) Sure is - brings up the issue of character to become or remain a licensee What I was refering to was PART 15 DEVICES. BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! "Mr. #### the FCC" is now snivveling away under the scrutiny of a REAL FCC attorney! Your "Part 15 devices" do NOT run more than 100mw, Todd! Every one of your posts cites devices running at least 10 watts with your expressed intent to go to 100 or more! Accually, Part 15 depends on Frequency, 100mw can be ran on the AM broadcast Band, on 160 to 190 I believe is 1 watt, at 13MHZ part 15 is 10,000 Microvolts per meter at 30 meters, on the FM Broadcast Band it 250 microvolts per meter @ 30 meters, and on Some frequencies it's high on other's it low. for more information goto: http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf C O W A R D ! ! ! ! ! ! Oooooooh! A WATT at 160khz. Real quick, Mr Pirate Radio Engineer, work out the ERP at that frequency based upon the antenna restrictions for that allocation! And your Part 15 ERP for the other HF allocations STILL works out to less than an 1/8th to 1/10th of a watt no matter where you go! But it STILL doesn't mask your illegal activities, specifically promoting and facilitating unlicensed radio operation. Idiot! Steve, K4YZ |
Hey, **** you Steve......Smart ass Ham Cop.
|
N9OGL wrote: Hey, @@@@ you Steve......Smart ### Ham Cop. Smarter than you, Todd...not that being smarter than you is any kind of a challenge. Steve, K4YZ |
N9OGL,
Copyright doesn't apply to "educational, discussions, ng posts etc" (It applies only to websites, magazines, music, broadcasts etc) so therefore IMHO any court in any democratic society would rule anything on a newsgroup, to be public domain. Another example is the Metallica v Napster issue. Whilst Metallica was succesful in having Napster made to comply with copyright law, there is nothing Metallica can do legally to stop me and my band playing "Enter Sandman" in the pub. If I was to sell this music afterwards on CD-for a profit-then I would be obliged to pay Metallica royalties. Further, for you to sue anyone for breach of copyright, you must first prove it was at a financial loss to yourself (or company) and that the person 'stealing' it is making money from it. As it's Amateur Radio, 'without pecuniary interests,' you, nor anyone else can claim to be making money from/or losing money from something involving Amateur Radio. Anything transmitted or done about amateur radio belongs, by default, to every licensed amateur in the world, not me, not you or anyone else. Only if someone takes your news bulletin, edits it a little and replays it, you may have a chance, provided the broadcast was on commercial bands (otherwise laws of commerce such as copyright don't apply). If you use the amateur band for your bulletin, then under copyright & amateur laws, the court would rule there was no commercial interest in the copyright and that by transmitting it on amateur bands you expected for it to be recorded and replayed by others at a later date. (Otherwise it would be illegal for the FCC/ACA to monitor and record ham transmissions), but anyone putting anything out on non-commercial radio frequencies can not have 'a reasonable expectation' of copyright. (This sounds like Down Under, a couple of UHF CB'ers (477MHz) tried to sue someone for re-transmitting their audio on 27MHz, but guess what, "How could they expect privacy and copyright on a public radio band?" and wasted all their money) Whilst I sought permission from ARNewsline to re-transmit ARNewsLine on UHF CB in Melbourne out of courtesy, Mr Pasternack said he appreciated the courtesy, yet I could have started re-transmitting it without his permission, but if AR News Line was on a commercial FM frequency then I would have to enter into a commercial agreement with AR Newsline. Or if I was to copy his website and claim it as 'mine', as the website is in a commercial domain. The contents of the ARRL Handbook is copyright. If I photocopy a band plan and give it to another ham I have not breached copyright. If I upload the entire book to the web for all to use, I have breached copyright, or re-print it and give it away. Names, trademarks etc are "copyright" such as I own the copyright to the magazine name "VicNews" ISSN 1038-6971, but that doesn't prevent teachers and educators photocopying my magazine for their students, nor does it prevent anyone here saying "I read in VicNews this week....this guy is wrong". There is nothing I can do about it. Let's see, by your logic, if I write here I hate Coca Cola, then Coca Cola could sue me for using their brand name without permission! Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station, fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do? Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to amateur. And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control community television? In Melbourne UHF Ch 31 is community tv, and is run by Melbourne's Uni's as an independent organisation. 2) Why does the ARRL handbook list cable channels on your free-to-air tv bandplan. Yes, we have cable tv, but our system is ABC 2 (VK's BBC), HSV 7, GTV 9, ATV 10, SBS 28 & UNI 31 on the normal tv (just plug an antenna into the set and tune) plus cable via Coax (Fox only downunder). If I wanted to do a show on Channel 31, I could, what's broadcast is up to Uni's Student Union, not a tv company. Perhaps by 'time travel' N9OGL is referring to the fact that when USA hams QSOs with hams Down Under or in New Zealand you are speaking to us tommorow and we are speaking to you yesterday :) PS N9OGL: To run even a 10% successful television, print or radio show/program/station/publication you must first learn that there is a certain 'way' of operating broadcast to amateur, the 'hype' factor I call it, but for this to be effective requires a well-spoken, educated, grammatically correct (or incorrect on purpose for desired effects, not just because you can't spell) (just watch your nightly news or listen to the radio, not the content, but how that content is presented) (Almost all media outlets use a book called a "Style Book" which maintains content and how that content is presented for all media formats in that organisation) Also, you'll need to get much better at punctuation, as punctuation is expression. If you are one of those guys who at school read mono-tone then you haven't a hope. Remember the kid that reads with expression (usually resulting in getting teased and laughed at hi hi) usually go on to be radio announcers, journalists, etc. And punctuation, grammar, spelling and expression go hand in hand. Example: (From "To Kill A Mocking Bird" by Harper Lee). With Expression: "Jem heard me. HE THRUST HIS HEAD AROUND THE CONNECTING DOOR. As he came to my bed Atticus's light flashed on. We stayed where we were until it went off; we heard him turn over and we waited until he was still again" Without: "Jem heard me. He thrust his head around the connecting door. As he came to my bed Atticus's light flashed on. We stayed where we were until it went off; we heard him turn over and we waited until he was still again" Also, I read in the posts about you 'getting upset' at the editing of the context of your program. Rather than call it 'censorship', and complain, do what any journalist worth his/her salt would do, re-word your show to still have the same impact and meaning without the profanity. You should also note, that NOT swearing is more effective THAN swearing. Example: you start your show tonight and include lot's of 'hells' 'dams' '****' etc, and people watch. Ten years down the track same thing. But, if you didn't swear for ten years at all, then one day came on air and said "This is bull****" it would be 200% more effective. Who out there knows someone who never swears? How shocked are you when "That's ####ed" come out of thier mouth, as opposed to someone who uses it as every second word. The former has such an impact as most people will interpret that as "He's really annoyed," "Whatever they did must have been pretty bad for him to use the f word. Whereas in the latter, it's just "There goes that gutter mouthed lout again" Having worked, albiet briefly, for the Herald & Weekly Times (Rupert's first company, and the one that started News Ltd & Fox) every employee is given a book which contains information on how certain articles and other issues are to be dealt with by the journalist. Example alright-those that allow this word into our media will be made to write "all right" 1000 times. (p.16, HWT Style Book, 8th Ed, 9/1990) Listen to AR newsline, an example of 'the format' "I'm Bill Pasternack W?ITF for Amateur Radio News Line" This is a post from the future.........(Sent from VK 1438hrs AEST, Thursday 31 March 2005) (UTC: 0338hrs, Thursday 31 March 2005) Looking forward to my next QSO with the past :) Ashley Geelan VK3HAG Australian Radio Amateur & Stand-In Volunteer Radio Announcer @ Plenty Valley FM 88.6FM Melbourne, Australia. I, too will be starting an on-air news bulletin, two in fact. One on the local community station, about amateur radio and a brief amateur bulletin for amateurs only who can call in to the studio (when I'm there) via amateur radio and go 'on air' with thier thoughts to help promote AR (instead of using the phone). This won't happen until I have co-ordinated a frequency to use with the local amateur club. Perhaps, N9OGL I could send/show you the correct way to format/run a newscast of any description. N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation, spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with these traits. "Barry OGrady" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:04:29 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives: from alt.sci.time-travel Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up a computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty years someone would reply back. comments? Its unlikely that your setup would still be functional 30 years from now. Todd Daugherty N9OGL Amateur Radio Operator (and) Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 10:44 pm The Answer to your first question is yes. A computer hooked to a TNC (which is a wireless modem) is set up with a timing system. Most "Packet" software for wireless communication has a timer system in it. It's part of the software. Why wait so long for the signal to transmit? because you want to be able to send the signal to a time period where high speed communication systems are in general uses. The systems in use then may not be compatible. Scientist are now just experimenting with high speed communication devices. For a person to send a signal back in time they would have to uses a high speed communication devices. Just remember it is a lot easier to sent a particle or a signal through time then it is human or an object. Its impossible to send anything through time. On your second comment about time travel via the human brain. I believe not only "time-travel" is possible via the human brain but I also believe while a person is a sleep the electro-magnetic emissions of say your brain is connected to the multi-you in every parallel universe. The only time your able to view those other universes is while your Brainwaves are at the lowest point of the spectrum (around 1 to 14 hz) This also might explain NDE. No technology can overcome the fact that there is nowhere to travel to. Todd N9OGL (and) snipped Barry |
Ashley VK3HAG wrote: (With Some Snippage to Pertinent Replies:) N9OGL, Copyright doesn't apply to "educational, discussions, ng posts etc" (It applies only to websites, magazines, music, broadcasts etc) so therefore IMHO any court in any democratic society would rule anything on a newsgroup, to be public domain. Toiddie doesn't care what courts or governmental agencies do. They're all "against him without any reason" anyway...! ! ! Whilst I sought permission from ARNewsline to re-transmit ARNewsLine on UHF CB in Melbourne out of courtesy, Mr Pasternack said he appreciated the courtesy, yet I could have started re-transmitting it without his permission...(SNIP) Bill's a fine fellow. He read an item I wrote on line and asked to re-print it in "Worldradio". I told him yes, of course. About 2 months later I got a check from him for the use! I sent it back. It was free in the first place...Nothing had changed, but I sure appreciated the offer. Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station, fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do? Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to amateur. You miss the point, Ashley...This is ONLY about Toiddie being able to express his own opinions as forcibly and frequently as he can. It's got NOTHING to do with the business of operating a station or promoting the arts. And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control community television? What we call "community television" or "public access" is so local promoters, presenters, etc can "get on the air" without having to spend all the cash to build thier own station. The local cable company has the studios, the cameras, processing gear, etc, and it can be rented to the "user" ready-to-go. You should also note, that NOT swearing is more effective THAN swearing. Example: you start your show tonight and include lot's of 'hells' 'dams' '****' etc, and people watch. Ten years down the track same thing. But, if you didn't swear for ten years at all, then one day came on air and said "This is bull****" it would be 200% more effective. Toiddie doesn't have anything to say unless he connects it with profanity. I, too will be starting an on-air news bulletin, two in fact. One on the local community station, about amateur radio and a brief amateur bulletin for amateurs only who can call in to the studio (when I'm there) via amateur radio and go 'on air' with thier thoughts to help promote AR (instead of using the phone). This won't happen until I have co-ordinated a frequency to use with the local amateur club. Perhaps, N9OGL I could send/show you the correct way to format/run a newscast of any description. P L E A S E send him the help anyway, Ashley! L O T S of it, too! N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation, spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with these traits. We've tried to tell him... The sad part is he's about to "graduate" from a "local" community "college", yet his grammar and vocabulary, well..suck! I used to (blindly) think that American education was above and beyond just about anything else out there...To my chagrin Toiddie proved me wrong. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
If N9OGL is only expressing his opinions, without actually offering a true
'bulletin service' (ie amateur news for all hams about ham activities, then I'm sure the FCC would rule -as would & have our ACA-then they would deem his broadcasts not be 'bulletins' but interference to others) Whilst an amateur bulletin can contain opinions about articles, it must also include amateur news information, though most good amateur news bulletins steer clear of 'opinions' and leave the 'opinions' section to those on frequency after the broadcast, and any decent broadcaster would simply listen in, not comment at all, in order to glean info about his audiences opinion and what they have come or would expect from said bulletin. Ever heard Bill Pasternack state what his opinion was on something on his bulletin, I haven't. He simply reports amateur radio facts he has found, but I'm bet If i met him person to person (unlikely given I'm an Aussie) he would, but not on his bulletin...he let's hams form their own opinions about what he has provided, the hallmark of good journalism...and I must say, the amateur bulletins of even the ARRL's bulletins, to some extent, contain a much higher standard of true journalism (reporting facts as recorded, not individual opinions..leaving opinions to be formed and debated by us the amateur on the air.. on here etc) Same with AR Newsline, W?ITF reports info he has found and tells you about it. He doesn't come on and say "The IRLP Contest..which I think sucks gets under way this week" but rather "The IRLP Contest gets under way this week" and leaves you to decide whether the IRLP contest is a good or bad idea etc. And here, down under, our WIA's news always closes with "This is VK4BB saying, until next week...Walk softly...we report it..you decide" What is N9OGL trying to do...create his own FOX News (ie give only the 'party'-his-line, rather than both sides of story..of which there always is) Hence the reason, I quit working for Rupert...he sucks. (and I could go to another paper, but he owns them all here..apart from some rural ones..but he's swallowing them up too...so what Australia gets, via radio, tv and print is mostly Rupert's opinion :( I've spent this arvo putting together a 'cut & paste' (as well as my own work) of a 1/2 hour bulletin just for you N9OGL. PS. Transmitting for 5 hours for amateur is ridiculous, what you want N9OGL is a nice, tight and structured approx. 1/2 hour bulletin every week based on a format of some sort. Eg. 11am: Open with "I'm Skippy, W9OGL and your tuned to [frequency] on your [mode] dial and this is "Amateur News Today" 1101: Quickly list all items on today's bulletin. "Coming up today we look at the IRLP Contest, Changes to VK amateur regulations," 1102: Re-introduce (the 'enforcement') repeat 11am, and add at the end "With USA Amateur News" 1105: USA Amateur News 1115: International Amateur News 1130: Contests and other items of interest to hams 1135: Close And lastly, ever notice N9OGL, how even when, say FOX journalists are offering thier opinions it is very cleverly purported as 'news', not opinion, otherwise, if people thought it was simply an opinion of one, they wouldn't listen, whereas, if it comes across as news, more people tend to believe that opinion as factual news. Or perhaps, N9OGL, you are just the 'journalist' that FOX is looking for :) The definition of amateur broadcasting is "bulletins" not "opinions". Opinions are formed in debate with others outside the newscast, not within it, unless stated that it is an "Opinion" piece, hence the reason we have 'columinsts', so people are made aware it's thier opinion, not the news as such. Yes, I too have made mistakes in the past and even flamed people I shouldn't have and acted in an inappropriate way on aus.xxx newsgroups. But I had the balls to accept my errors, apologised-in person-to the people I had treated unfairly and moved on.......(now we all get on fine on aus.xx newsgroups) As Murphy said "Don't argue with fools..people mightn't know the difference" (a lesson I too had to learn) And for those interested in how Community Television "Public Access" works down under..here is the link.... So instead of carrying on about the FCC N9OGL, perhaps you have been fighting the wrong battle. Why not try and have a College set-up and control a "Public Access" channel, that's easy, just cut & paste the Aussie model and fight for that. 1. You'd have more chance of getting somewhere and 2. You would be doing something that really does benifit the community. I'll relay my first bulletin to N9OGL's home town (any hams who can help with a HF or IRLP link?) and show N9OGL how a news bulletin is put together? My qualifications for speaking on this matter a As for my experience in this field, I started out in Year 10 (16yo) doing Work Experience for the local rag (DV News), and when I got there on Monday was sent to make coffee, and was told that's what I'd be doing for the fortnight (no suprises here). But by mid-afternoon, the journalist I was assigned to was that impressed, she spoke to the boss, got me a HWT Style Book (mentioned last post) and I was taken off the coffee and sent into the field, at 16, on Work Experience to report. My first interview was with a state Premier, something some 50yo journos are yet to do. I never went back to school full-time, and the report on my Work Experience that was sent to my school says, and I quote "Best Work Experience student this company has ever had, has a great future in journalism." (My standards of spelling and grammar etc were better than some of the journos they were emplyiong at the time..who didn't like me much at all, but saw me as the 'smart arse 16yo bloke who knows everything' (In reality, I know nothing, as do us all..or we don't take in new ideas, concepts, etc) No, I am not a Uni qualified journalist, but in the world of journalism, those that do it my way are much more respected for having 'done the yards' so to speak and I can pick a uni-journo written article from a x-cadets one easy as..can you? PS. I don't use OE's spell-checker, I like to read and correct my own mistakes, so please point out any bad grammar or spelling, as I always should be able to self-edit, without the need for a spell-checker. Also notice that I refrain from profanity (when I'd love to use a few choice words) unless it has some contextual meaning to my writing, otherwise it's effect on the reader is lost. Cheers & Beers from VK, "Hoo Roo" VK3HAG Goto go QSO to do "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Ashley VK3HAG wrote: (With Some Snippage to Pertinent Replies:) N9OGL, Copyright doesn't apply to "educational, discussions, ng posts etc" (It applies only to websites, magazines, music, broadcasts etc) so therefore IMHO any court in any democratic society would rule anything on a newsgroup, to be public domain. Toiddie doesn't care what courts or governmental agencies do. They're all "against him without any reason" anyway...! ! ! Whilst I sought permission from ARNewsline to re-transmit ARNewsLine on UHF CB in Melbourne out of courtesy, Mr Pasternack said he appreciated the courtesy, yet I could have started re-transmitting it without his permission...(SNIP) Bill's a fine fellow. He read an item I wrote on line and asked to re-print it in "Worldradio". I told him yes, of course. About 2 months later I got a check from him for the use! I sent it back. It was free in the first place...Nothing had changed, but I sure appreciated the offer. Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station, fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do? Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to amateur. You miss the point, Ashley...This is ONLY about Toiddie being able to express his own opinions as forcibly and frequently as he can. It's got NOTHING to do with the business of operating a station or promoting the arts. And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control community television? What we call "community television" or "public access" is so local promoters, presenters, etc can "get on the air" without having to spend all the cash to build thier own station. Thankfully ours is controlled and owned by uni students Stduent Union (your college?) who really couldn't give a hoot what's on there. (Pole dancing, sex, whatever, and even though broadcasting rules are breached every minute on Ch 31, because no one complains-no one is watching-it continues daily) The local cable company has the studios, the cameras, processing gear, etc, and it can be rented to the "user" ready-to-go. You should also note, that NOT swearing is more effective THAN swearing. Example: you start your show tonight and include lot's of 'hells' 'dams' '****' etc, and people watch. Ten years down the track same thing. But, if you didn't swear for ten years at all, then one day came on air and said "This is bull****" it would be 200% more effective. Toiddie doesn't have anything to say unless he connects it with profanity. I, too will be starting an on-air news bulletin, two in fact. One on the local community station, about amateur radio and a brief amateur bulletin for amateurs only who can call in to the studio (when I'm there) via amateur radio and go 'on air' with thier thoughts to help promote AR (instead of using the phone). This won't happen until I have co-ordinated a frequency to use with the local amateur club. Perhaps, N9OGL I could send/show you the correct way to format/run a newscast of any description. P L E A S E send him the help anyway, Ashley! L O T S of it, too! N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation, spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with these traits. We've tried to tell him... The sad part is he's about to "graduate" from a "local" community "college", yet his grammar and vocabulary, well..suck! I used to (blindly) think that American education was above and beyond just about anything else out there...To my chagrin Toiddie proved me wrong. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Ooops, here is the link to Melbourne's Ch 31 Uni TV (most VK capital cities
have Ch 31) http://www.channel31.org.au/ "Ashley VK3HAG" wrote in message ... If N9OGL is only expressing his opinions, without actually offering a true 'bulletin service' (ie amateur news for all hams about ham activities, then I'm sure the FCC would rule -as would & have our ACA-then they would deem his broadcasts not be 'bulletins' but interference to others) Whilst an amateur bulletin can contain opinions about articles, it must also include amateur news information, though most good amateur news bulletins steer clear of 'opinions' and leave the 'opinions' section to those on frequency after the broadcast, and any decent broadcaster would simply listen in, not comment at all, in order to glean info about his audiences opinion and what they have come or would expect from said bulletin. Ever heard Bill Pasternack state what his opinion was on something on his bulletin, I haven't. He simply reports amateur radio facts he has found, but I'm bet If i met him person to person (unlikely given I'm an Aussie) he would, but not on his bulletin...he let's hams form their own opinions about what he has provided, the hallmark of good journalism...and I must say, the amateur bulletins of even the ARRL's bulletins, to some extent, contain a much higher standard of true journalism (reporting facts as recorded, not individual opinions..leaving opinions to be formed and debated by us the amateur on the air.. on here etc) Same with AR Newsline, W?ITF reports info he has found and tells you about it. He doesn't come on and say "The IRLP Contest..which I think sucks gets under way this week" but rather "The IRLP Contest gets under way this week" and leaves you to decide whether the IRLP contest is a good or bad idea etc. And here, down under, our WIA's news always closes with "This is VK4BB saying, until next week...Walk softly...we report it..you decide" What is N9OGL trying to do...create his own FOX News (ie give only the 'party'-his-line, rather than both sides of story..of which there always is) Hence the reason, I quit working for Rupert...he sucks. (and I could go to another paper, but he owns them all here..apart from some rural ones..but he's swallowing them up too...so what Australia gets, via radio, tv and print is mostly Rupert's opinion :( I've spent this arvo putting together a 'cut & paste' (as well as my own work) of a 1/2 hour bulletin just for you N9OGL. PS. Transmitting for 5 hours for amateur is ridiculous, what you want N9OGL is a nice, tight and structured approx. 1/2 hour bulletin every week based on a format of some sort. Eg. 11am: Open with "I'm Skippy, W9OGL and your tuned to [frequency] on your [mode] dial and this is "Amateur News Today" 1101: Quickly list all items on today's bulletin. "Coming up today we look at the IRLP Contest, Changes to VK amateur regulations," 1102: Re-introduce (the 'enforcement') repeat 11am, and add at the end "With USA Amateur News" 1105: USA Amateur News 1115: International Amateur News 1130: Contests and other items of interest to hams 1135: Close And lastly, ever notice N9OGL, how even when, say FOX journalists are offering thier opinions it is very cleverly purported as 'news', not opinion, otherwise, if people thought it was simply an opinion of one, they wouldn't listen, whereas, if it comes across as news, more people tend to believe that opinion as factual news. Or perhaps, N9OGL, you are just the 'journalist' that FOX is looking for :) The definition of amateur broadcasting is "bulletins" not "opinions". Opinions are formed in debate with others outside the newscast, not within it, unless stated that it is an "Opinion" piece, hence the reason we have 'columinsts', so people are made aware it's thier opinion, not the news as such. Yes, I too have made mistakes in the past and even flamed people I shouldn't have and acted in an inappropriate way on aus.xxx newsgroups. But I had the balls to accept my errors, apologised-in person-to the people I had treated unfairly and moved on.......(now we all get on fine on aus.xx newsgroups) As Murphy said "Don't argue with fools..people mightn't know the difference" (a lesson I too had to learn) And for those interested in how Community Television "Public Access" works down under..here is the link.... So instead of carrying on about the FCC N9OGL, perhaps you have been fighting the wrong battle. Why not try and have a College set-up and control a "Public Access" channel, that's easy, just cut & paste the Aussie model and fight for that. 1. You'd have more chance of getting somewhere and 2. You would be doing something that really does benifit the community. I'll relay my first bulletin to N9OGL's home town (any hams who can help with a HF or IRLP link?) and show N9OGL how a news bulletin is put together? My qualifications for speaking on this matter a As for my experience in this field, I started out in Year 10 (16yo) doing Work Experience for the local rag (DV News), and when I got there on Monday was sent to make coffee, and was told that's what I'd be doing for the fortnight (no suprises here). But by mid-afternoon, the journalist I was assigned to was that impressed, she spoke to the boss, got me a HWT Style Book (mentioned last post) and I was taken off the coffee and sent into the field, at 16, on Work Experience to report. My first interview was with a state Premier, something some 50yo journos are yet to do. I never went back to school full-time, and the report on my Work Experience that was sent to my school says, and I quote "Best Work Experience student this company has ever had, has a great future in journalism." (My standards of spelling and grammar etc were better than some of the journos they were emplyiong at the time..who didn't like me much at all, but saw me as the 'smart arse 16yo bloke who knows everything' (In reality, I know nothing, as do us all..or we don't take in new ideas, concepts, etc) No, I am not a Uni qualified journalist, but in the world of journalism, those that do it my way are much more respected for having 'done the yards' so to speak and I can pick a uni-journo written article from a x-cadets one easy as..can you? PS. I don't use OE's spell-checker, I like to read and correct my own mistakes, so please point out any bad grammar or spelling, as I always should be able to self-edit, without the need for a spell-checker. Also notice that I refrain from profanity (when I'd love to use a few choice words) unless it has some contextual meaning to my writing, otherwise it's effect on the reader is lost. Cheers & Beers from VK, "Hoo Roo" VK3HAG Goto go QSO to do "K4YZ" wrote in message oups.com... Ashley VK3HAG wrote: (With Some Snippage to Pertinent Replies:) N9OGL, Copyright doesn't apply to "educational, discussions, ng posts etc" (It applies only to websites, magazines, music, broadcasts etc) so therefore IMHO any court in any democratic society would rule anything on a newsgroup, to be public domain. Toiddie doesn't care what courts or governmental agencies do. They're all "against him without any reason" anyway...! ! ! Whilst I sought permission from ARNewsline to re-transmit ARNewsLine on UHF CB in Melbourne out of courtesy, Mr Pasternack said he appreciated the courtesy, yet I could have started re-transmitting it without his permission...(SNIP) Bill's a fine fellow. He read an item I wrote on line and asked to re-print it in "Worldradio". I told him yes, of course. About 2 months later I got a check from him for the use! I sent it back. It was free in the first place...Nothing had changed, but I sure appreciated the offer. Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station, fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do? Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to amateur. You miss the point, Ashley...This is ONLY about Toiddie being able to express his own opinions as forcibly and frequently as he can. It's got NOTHING to do with the business of operating a station or promoting the arts. And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control community television? What we call "community television" or "public access" is so local promoters, presenters, etc can "get on the air" without having to spend all the cash to build thier own station. Thankfully ours is controlled and owned by uni students Stduent Union (your college?) who really couldn't give a hoot what's on there. (Pole dancing, sex, whatever, and even though broadcasting rules are breached every minute on Ch 31, because no one complains-no one is watching-it continues daily) The local cable company has the studios, the cameras, processing gear, etc, and it can be rented to the "user" ready-to-go. You should also note, that NOT swearing is more effective THAN swearing. Example: you start your show tonight and include lot's of 'hells' 'dams' '****' etc, and people watch. Ten years down the track same thing. But, if you didn't swear for ten years at all, then one day came on air and said "This is bull****" it would be 200% more effective. Toiddie doesn't have anything to say unless he connects it with profanity. I, too will be starting an on-air news bulletin, two in fact. One on the local community station, about amateur radio and a brief amateur bulletin for amateurs only who can call in to the studio (when I'm there) via amateur radio and go 'on air' with thier thoughts to help promote AR (instead of using the phone). This won't happen until I have co-ordinated a frequency to use with the local amateur club. Perhaps, N9OGL I could send/show you the correct way to format/run a newscast of any description. P L E A S E send him the help anyway, Ashley! L O T S of it, too! N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation, spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with these traits. We've tried to tell him... The sad part is he's about to "graduate" from a "local" community "college", yet his grammar and vocabulary, well..suck! I used to (blindly) think that American education was above and beyond just about anything else out there...To my chagrin Toiddie proved me wrong. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Ashley VK3HAG wrote:
N9OGL, Helo Ashley, Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station, fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do? Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to amateur. Our community has one FM broadcast station and no television station. The local station will not allow you go in and run a show on their station. My group in the 90's tried starting a low power tv station for the purpose of allowing people in the community to use it. unlike someone (K4YZ) who thinks it's all about me. We also have a "Public Access" channel unfortunately the cable company has complete control over it. (something they are not allowed to do) My group has tried repeatively to get programs on the public access channel (including programs from the University of Illinois and the University of Chicago) but the cable company refuses to allow us access to the channel. We complain to the city and the cable comes back say Oh we will give you access but lets wait for a few months and we will call you. when the few months are up the proccess starts all over again. And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control community television? In Melbourne UHF Ch 31 is community tv, and is run by Melbourne's Uni's as an independent organisation. Public Access channels are created through the franchise agreement. Cable companies are not allowed to have any editorial control over the channel. However, there are some cable companies and in some places local governments who censor and "control" the access channel. 2) Why does the ARRL handbook list cable channels on your free-to-air tv bandplan. Yes, we have cable tv, but our system is ABC 2 (VK's BBC), HSV 7, GTV 9, ATV 10, SBS 28 & UNI 31 on the normal tv (just plug an antenna into the set and tune) plus cable via Coax (Fox only downunder). If I wanted to do a show on Channel 31, I could, what's broadcast is up to Uni's Student Union, not a tv company. Perhaps by 'time travel' N9OGL is referring to the fact that when USA hams QSOs with hams Down Under or in New Zealand you are speaking to us tommorow and we are speaking to you yesterday :) Technical your right there :) I remember getting off work at 5.00 pm and getting on the radio and talk to a guy in Japan who was on his way to work, it was 7.00 am the next day there. The "time travel" I was talking about will be posted on my invention blog along with explainations of some of my other idea's these so-called hams bad mouth. PS N9OGL: To run even a 10% successful television, print or radio show/program/station/publication you must first learn that there is a certain 'way' of operating broadcast to amateur, the 'hype' factor I call it, but for this to be effective requires a well-spoken, educated, grammatically correct (or incorrect on purpose for desired effects, not just because you can't spell) (just watch your nightly news or listen to the radio, not the content, but how that content is presented) (Almost all media outlets use a book called a "Style Book" which maintains content and how that content is presented for all media formats in that organisation) Also, you'll need to get much better at punctuation, as punctuation is expression. If you are one of those guys who at school read mono-tone then you haven't a hope. Remember the kid that reads with expression (usually resulting in getting teased and laughed at hi hi) usually go on to be radio announcers, journalists, etc. And punctuation, grammar, spelling and expression go hand in hand. Example: (From "To Kill A Mocking Bird" by Harper Lee). With Expression: "Jem heard me. HE THRUST HIS HEAD AROUND THE CONNECTING DOOR. As he came to my bed Atticus's light flashed on. We stayed where we were until it went off; we heard him turn over and we waited until he was still again" Without: "Jem heard me. He thrust his head around the connecting door. As he came to my bed Atticus's light flashed on. We stayed where we were until it went off; we heard him turn over and we waited until he was still again" Also, I read in the posts about you 'getting upset' at the editing of the context of your program. Rather than call it 'censorship', and complain, do what any journalist worth his/her salt would do, re-word your show to still have the same impact and meaning without the profanity. You should also note, that NOT swearing is more effective THAN swearing. Example: you start your show tonight and include lot's of 'hells' 'dams' '****' etc, and people watch. Ten years down the track same thing. But, if you didn't swear for ten years at all, then one day came on air and said "This is bull****" it would be 200% more effective. Who out there knows someone who never swears? How shocked are you when "That's ####ed" come out of thier mouth, as opposed to someone who uses it as every second word. The former has such an impact as most people will interpret that as "He's really annoyed," "Whatever they did must have been pretty bad for him to use the f word. Whereas in the latter, it's just "There goes that gutter mouthed lout again" Having worked, albiet briefly, for the Herald & Weekly Times (Rupert's first company, and the one that started News Ltd & Fox) every employee is given a book which contains information on how certain articles and other issues are to be dealt with by the journalist. Example alright-those that allow this word into our media will be made to write "all right" 1000 times. (p.16, HWT Style Book, 8th Ed, 9/1990) Listen to AR newsline, an example of 'the format' "I'm Bill Pasternack W?ITF for Amateur Radio News Line" This is a post from the future.........(Sent from VK 1438hrs AEST, Thursday 31 March 2005) (UTC: 0338hrs, Thursday 31 March 2005) Looking forward to my next QSO with the past :) Ashley Geelan VK3HAG Australian Radio Amateur & Stand-In Volunteer Radio Announcer @ Plenty Valley FM 88.6FM Melbourne, Australia. I, too will be starting an on-air news bulletin, two in fact. One on the local community station, about amateur radio and a brief amateur bulletin for amateurs only who can call in to the studio (when I'm there) via amateur radio and go 'on air' with thier thoughts to help promote AR (instead of using the phone). This won't happen until I have co-ordinated a frequency to use with the local amateur club. Perhaps, N9OGL I could send/show you the correct way to format/run a newscast of any description. N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation, spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with these traits. I'm usually on echolink, my repeater is also tied into it. The echolink on the repeater is off by my personal station is up. Todd N9OGL "Barry OGrady" wrote in message ... On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:04:29 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: More of our r.r.a.p. Tom Swift, gleaned from the archives: from alt.sci.time-travel Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 7:24 pm I've have this Idea for a "simple" Time Machine. A operator would set up a computer up to a high power wireless system. They would then set the computer to transmit a message say in 30 years and hope that in thirty years someone would reply back. comments? Its unlikely that your setup would still be functional 30 years from now. Todd Daugherty N9OGL Amateur Radio Operator (and) Todd Daugherty Jun 26 2003, 10:44 pm The Answer to your first question is yes. A computer hooked to a TNC (which is a wireless modem) is set up with a timing system. Most "Packet" software for wireless communication has a timer system in it. It's part of the software. Why wait so long for the signal to transmit? because you want to be able to send the signal to a time period where high speed communication systems are in general uses. The systems in use then may not be compatible. Scientist are now just experimenting with high speed communication devices. For a person to send a signal back in time they would have to uses a high speed communication devices. Just remember it is a lot easier to sent a particle or a signal through time then it is human or an object. Its impossible to send anything through time. On your second comment about time travel via the human brain. I believe not only "time-travel" is possible via the human brain but I also believe while a person is a sleep the electro-magnetic emissions of say your brain is connected to the multi-you in every parallel universe. The only time your able to view those other universes is while your Brainwaves are at the lowest point of the spectrum (around 1 to 14 hz) This also might explain NDE. No technology can overcome the fact that there is nowhere to travel to. Todd N9OGL (and) snipped Barry |
N9OGL wrote: Ashley VK3HAG wrote: N9OGL, Helo Ashley, Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station, fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do? Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to amateur. Our community has one FM broadcast station and no television station. The local station will not allow you go in and run a show on their station. My group in the 90's tried starting a low power tv station for the purpose of allowing people in the community to use it. unlike someone (K4YZ) who thinks it's all about me. Sure it is "all about (you)", Todd. We also have a "Public Access" channel unfortunately the cable company has complete control over it. (something they are not allowed to do). Sure they can. They own the cable, the studios, the equipment, etc. What makes you think they can't exercise control over thier own assets, Todd? My group has tried repeatively to get programs on the public access channel (including programs from the University of Illinois and the University of Chicago) but the cable company refuses to allow us access to the channel. We complain to the city and the cable comes back say Oh we will give you access but lets wait for a few months and we will call you. when the few months are up the proccess starts all over again. You're profane, demanding, poorly organized, functionally illiterate and rude. What part of those personal traits do you think the cable company finds endearing? And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control community television? In Melbourne UHF Ch 31 is community tv, and is run by Melbourne's Uni's as an independent organisation. Public Access channels are created through the franchise agreement. Cable companies are not allowed to have any editorial control over the channel. However, there are some cable companies and in some places local governments who censor and "control" the access channel. The FCC has stated that communities have the right to determine the nature of content of what airs on thier communities systems. Obviously someone in Taylorville is unimpressed with your ability to meet community standards, Todd. Judging by the way you represent yourself in this forum, I'd say they are spot-on. 2) Why does the ARRL handbook list cable channels on your free-to-air tv bandplan. Yes, we have cable tv, but our system is ABC 2 (VK's BBC), HSV 7, GTV 9, ATV 10, SBS 28 & UNI 31 on the normal tv (just plug an antenna into the set and tune) plus cable via Coax (Fox only downunder). If I wanted to do a show on Channel 31, I could, what's broadcast is up to Uni's Student Union, not a tv company. Perhaps by 'time travel' N9OGL is referring to the fact that when USA hams QSOs with hams Down Under or in New Zealand you are speaking to us tommorow and we are speaking to you yesterday :) Technical your right there :) I remember getting off work at 5.00 pm and getting on the radio and talk to a guy in Japan who was on his way to work, it was 7.00 am the next day there. The "time travel" I was talking about will be posted on my invention blog along with explainations of some of my other idea's these so-called hams bad mouth. It's not badmouthing, Todd. You suggested using a storage capacitor cooled by liquid oxygen. That was stupid on so many levels as to be hillarious. And in the realm of communications, you "propose" a networking/datalink system that is several developmental generations BEHIND current technology. They are not "inventions"...They are really bad ideas. I just hope I am at least 500 miles away from your power capacitor project if you ever try to buid it. Big Snip: N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation, spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with these traits. I'm usually on echolink, my repeater is also tied into it. The echolink on the repeater is off by my personal station is up. Yes, Todd...you still have yet to tell us about all those homebrew/kitbuilt features of N9OGL...remember..?!?! You were "badmouthing" all those "appliance operators"...??? You have yet to give us an accounting of your station or repeater lineup. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: Ashley VK3HAG wrote: N9OGL, Helo Ashley, Instead of wasting your time, effort & money on a pirate TV station, fighting the FCC (our ACA isn't much better btw) why not volunteer your time and expertise to the local community radio and television stations as I do? Not only could you broadcast what you want, you could help save the community station thousands of dollars by carrying out free maintained and repairs. I leave my broadcasting to broadcast services and amateur to amateur. Our community has one FM broadcast station and no television station. The local station will not allow you go in and run a show on their station. My group in the 90's tried starting a low power tv station for the purpose of allowing people in the community to use it. unlike someone (K4YZ) who thinks it's all about me. Sure it is "all about (you)", Todd. Steve, no, your very wrong, very wrong. We also have a "Public Access" channel unfortunately the cable company has complete control over it. (something they are not allowed to do). Sure they can. They own the cable, the studios, the equipment, etc. What makes you think they can't exercise control over thier own assets, Todd? The only "power" the cable company has over the content is setting what time the program may air and the availability of the channel. As for studio and equipmet, the only equipment that have is a VCR hooked into the cable line. They don't have any "Studio" and as for cable, the local goverment created public access in turn the cable company was given the "right of way" The problem here is NO ONE is allowed to use the "public access" channel. But if you want to more about what controls cable comapnies have over "public access" go talk to Media Alliance @ http://www.media-alliance.org/ My group has tried repeatively to get programs on the public access channel (including programs from the University of Illinois and the University of Chicago) but the cable company refuses to allow us access to the channel. We complain to the city and the cable comes back say Oh we will give you access but lets wait for a few months and we will call you. when the few months are up the proccess starts all over again. You're profane, demanding, poorly organized, functionally illiterate and rude. What part of those personal traits do you think the cable company finds endearing? Well steve, again your wrong, I'm a hell of lot nicer to them then to some dumbas ham operators who bad mouth people on a "Usenet" And two questions for US ppl on he 1) Why does the cable channel control community television? In Melbourne UHF Ch 31 is community tv, and is run by Melbourne's Uni's as an independent organisation. Public Access channels are created through the franchise agreement. Cable companies are not allowed to have any editorial control over the channel. However, there are some cable companies and in some places local governments who censor and "control" the access channel. The FCC has stated that communities have the right to determine the nature of content of what airs on thier communities systems. The FCC has no juridiction over public access channels, that is let up to the community who, in term is to have available to the public what the rules and regulations of the public access channel is; which this group doesn't. Obviously someone in Taylorville is unimpressed with your ability to meet community standards, Todd. First of dickead, I happen to be a very very very old friend of the mayor of this community, before him it was my uncle who ran this town. (my family is very political) Secondly the cable company has been in trouble with the mayors office because of this matter. Recently my group filed a complaint on behave of a small church who didn't want to start trouble. The complaint was the church wanted to use the public access channel for their services but the cable comapny told them they were switching the public access channel over to Beta format. For the small church to now use the channel they would have to spend out $14,000 on equipment, money they didn't have. So when I had a meeting with the mayor it came to our attention that not only where the church's complaining but the schools were too. to make a long story short the city told the cable comapny if they did switch to beta that the city would cancel their franchise agreement....so the cable didn't switch formats. Judging by the way you represent yourself in this forum, I'd say they are spot-on. 2) Why does the ARRL handbook list cable channels on your free-to-air tv bandplan. Yes, we have cable tv, but our system is ABC 2 (VK's BBC), HSV 7, GTV 9, ATV 10, SBS 28 & UNI 31 on the normal tv (just plug an antenna into the set and tune) plus cable via Coax (Fox only downunder). If I wanted to do a show on Channel 31, I could, what's broadcast is up to Uni's Student Union, not a tv company. Perhaps by 'time travel' N9OGL is referring to the fact that when USA hams QSOs with hams Down Under or in New Zealand you are speaking to us tommorow and we are speaking to you yesterday :) Technical your right there :) I remember getting off work at 5.00 pm and getting on the radio and talk to a guy in Japan who was on his way to work, it was 7.00 am the next day there. The "time travel" I was talking about will be posted on my invention blog along with explainations of some of my other idea's these so-called hams bad mouth. It's not badmouthing, Todd. You suggested using a storage capacitor cooled by liquid oxygen. That was stupid on so many levels as to be hillarious. What's wrong with that, liquid Oxygen can be used as a coolent as well as rocket fuel. The coolent is no where near a spark and the coolent circulates through pipes around the displacement chamber, between two sets of walls. (not the capacitor as you keep claiming) And in the realm of communications, you "propose" a networking/datalink system that is several developmental generations BEHIND current technology. REALLY dickhead, what amateur stations are running what i'm purposing.......NONE!!!! steve, I think your stupid, or lying, but I do think you don't get all the facts They are not "inventions"...They are really bad ideas. I just hope I am at least 500 miles away from your power capacitor project if you ever try to buid it. I would point out steve, that what's on that website is NOT the complete system, and I will not post the compete system on here or on that website. So there really is more to then what I'm ALLOWED to say. Big Snip: N9OGL, if you have an Echo or IRLP node nearby would you like me to connect to it and give a demonstration on this. No point having a broadcast of any description until you have the fundamentals in place-grammar, pronunciation, spelling, don't bother, it's hard enough to capture a (any) audience with these traits. I'm usually on echolink, my repeater is also tied into it. The echolink on the repeater is off by my personal station is up. Yes, Todd...you still have yet to tell us about all those homebrew/kitbuilt features of N9OGL...remember..?!?! You were "badmouthing" all those "appliance operators"...??? You have yet to give us an accounting of your station or repeater lineup. frankly steve, the way you've treated not only me or anyone else one here. I'm not under any obligation to tell YOU or anyone else what equipment I have, the bottom line is, I DO build things, a lot more then what you think. Todd N9OGL Steve, K4YZ |
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: Sure it is "all about (you)", Todd. Steve, no, your very wrong, very wrong. No, I'm not. What makes you think they can't exercise control over thier own assets, Todd? The only "power" the cable company has over the content is setting what time the program may air and the availability of the channel. As for studio and equipmet, the only equipment that have is a VCR hooked into the cable line. They don't have any "Studio" and as for cable, the local goverment created public access in turn the cable company was given the "right of way" The problem here is NO ONE is allowed to use the "public access" channel. But if you want to more about what controls cable comapnies have over "public access" go talk to Media Alliance @ http://www.media-alliance.org/ You didn't answer my question. Does the cable company NOT have control over thie own assets? Yes or no wil suffice nicenly, thank-you. You're profane, demanding, poorly organized, functionally illiterate and rude. What part of those personal traits do you think the cable company finds endearing? Well steve, again your wrong, I'm a hell of lot nicer to them then to some dumbas ham operators who bad mouth people on a "Usenet" I find that very, VERY hard to believe. The FCC has stated that communities have the right to determine the nature of content of what airs on thier communities systems. The FCC has no juridiction over public access channels, that is let up to the community who, in term is to have available to the public what the rules and regulations of the public access channel is; which this group doesn't. I didn't say the FCC had jurisdiction, Todd. Please stay focused. I said that the COMMUNITIES have the right to determine the nature of the content in thier communities. Obviously someone in Taylorville is unimpressed with your ability to meet community standards, Todd. First of ####ead...(SNIP) Gee...You're right, Todd. Threre's one of those "dum### hams badmouthing people on USENET" right now! And PROOF of what I've been saying all along. I happen to be a very very very old friend of the mayor of this community, before him it was my uncle who ran this town. (my family is very political) Obviously not political enough. Secondly the cable company has been in trouble with the mayors office because of this matter. Recently my group filed a complaint on behave of a small church who didn't want to start trouble. On "behalf", Todd. And I am sure if they knew what a swell guy you REALLY are, they wouldn't have bothered. The complaint was the church wanted to use the public access channel for their services but the cable comapny told them they were switching the public access channel over to Beta format. For the small church to now use the channel they would have to spend out $14,000 on equipment, money they didn't have. So when I had a meeting with the mayor it came to our attention that not only where the church's complaining but the schools were too. to make a long story short the city told the cable comapny if they did switch to beta that the city would cancel their franchise agreement....so the cable didn't switch formats. And this pertains to your operation of illegal "broadcast stations" how? It's not badmouthing, Todd. You suggested using a storage capacitor cooled by liquid oxygen. That was stupid on so many levels as to be hillarious. What's wrong with that, liquid Oxygen can be used as a coolent as well as rocket fuel. The coolent is no where near a spark and the coolent circulates through pipes around the displacement chamber, between two sets of walls. (not the capacitor as you keep claiming) Doesn't matter, Todd...LOX is not used as a refrigerant because it's an O X I D I Z E R. It makes things burn, in some cases very rapidly (please see any film clip of a Saturn 5 rocket ascending). And if you plan on using LOX A N Y W H E R E near an electrical source, you are introducing an I G N I T I O N source. Now, going back to ELEMENTARY SCHOOL scinence, guess what happens when you mix an oxidizer, an ignition source, and any FUEL...??? And in the realm of communications, you "propose" a networking/datalink system that is several developmental generations BEHIND current technology. REALLY ####head...(SNIP) There's that " dum### ham badmouthing people on USENET" again.... ...(UNSNIP)...what amateur stations are running what i'm purposing.......NONE!!!! steve, I think your stupid, or lying, but I do think you don't get all the facts Oh, I have all the "facts", OK, Todd. I didn't say ANYthing about "amateur stations"... I said your protocol is several developmental generations behind current technology. That's NOT untrue. They are not "inventions"...They are really bad ideas. I just hope I am at least 500 miles away from your power capacitor project if you ever try to buid it. I would point out steve, that what's on that website is NOT the complete system, and I will not post the compete system on here or on that website. So there really is more to then what I'm ALLOWED to say. You're not "allowed" to say...?!?! BBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ! ! ! ! Yes, Todd...you still have yet to tell us about all those homebrew/kitbuilt features of N9OGL...remember..?!?! You were "badmouthing" all those "appliance operators"...??? You have yet to give us an accounting of your station or repeater lineup. frankly steve, the way you've treated not only me or anyone else one here. I'm not under any obligation to tell YOU or anyone else what equipment I have, the bottom line is, I DO build things, a lot more then what you think. Frankly, Todd, this is EXACTLY the answer I expected. The "bottom line" is you can't build a kit unless the instructions are written in crayon and it has those little cartoon pictures of people doing things so you can follow along. You've had over a week to pony up all your non-"appliance" station line-up, Todd, and it's taken you THIS long to figure a way to weasel your way out of the corner you've backed yourself into. Nice try. It didn't work. Steve, K4YZ |
You didn't answer my question.
Does the cable company NOT have control over thie own assets? Yes or no wil suffice nicenly, thank-you. The ONLY POWER A CABLE COMAPNY HAS OVER THE CONTENT IS THE AVABILITY OF THE CHANNEL( I.E. SET UP THE TIME THE PROGRAM IS TO AIR) AND THAT'S IT!!! I didn't say the FCC had jurisdiction, Todd. Please stay focused. I said that the COMMUNITIES have the right to determine the nature of the content in thier communities But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel. Gee...You're right, Todd. Threre's one of those "dum### hams badmouthing people on USENET" right now! And PROOF of what I've been saying all along. Well steve if you weren't such an asshole, perhaps I would treat you a little nicer. And I am sure if they knew what a swell guy you REALLY are, they wouldn't have bothered. I'm a hell a lot nicer then you think, again if your weren't an asshole I would be a little nicer. And this pertains to your operation of illegal "broadcast stations" how? It don't, I was pointing out that the cable company has been in trouble with the city for repeative violation peoples free speech on the public access channel. Doesn't matter, Todd...LOX is not used as a refrigerant because it's an O X I D I Z E R. It makes things burn, in some cases very rapidly (please see any film clip of a Saturn 5 rocket ascending). And if you plan on using LOX A N Y W H E R E near an electrical source, you are introducing an I G N I T I O N source. Now, going back to ELEMENTARY SCHOOL scinence, guess what happens when you mix an oxidizer, an ignition source, and any FUEL...??? ok, then I'll use liquid Nitrogen then. I said your protocol is several developmental generations behind current technology. That's NOT untrue. The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the amateur band. Todd N9OGL |
"N9OGL" wrote in message oups.com... [snip] K4YZ wrote: Obviously someone in Taylorville is unimpressed with your ability to meet community standards, Todd. First of dickead, I happen to be a very very very old friend of the mayor of this community, before him it was my uncle who ran this town. (my family is very political) Secondly the cable company has been in trouble with the mayors office because of this matter. Recently my group filed a complaint on behave of a small church who didn't want to start trouble. The complaint was the church wanted to use the public access channel for their services but the cable comapny told them they were switching the public access channel over to Beta format. For the small church to now use the channel they would have to spend out $14,000 on equipment, money they didn't have. So when I had a meeting with the mayor it came to our attention that not only where the church's complaining but the schools were too. to make a long story short the city told the cable comapny if they did switch to beta that the city would cancel their franchise agreement....so the cable didn't switch formats. If you are going to make up a story, at least get the technology straight. Beta has been dead for a very long time (in technology terms). No one would be switching to Beta. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Dee Flint wrote: "N9OGL" wrote in message oups.com... [snip] K4YZ wrote: Obviously someone in Taylorville is unimpressed with your ability to meet community standards, Todd. First of dickead, I happen to be a very very very old friend of the mayor of this community, before him it was my uncle who ran this town. (my family is very political) Secondly the cable company has been in trouble with the mayors office because of this matter. Recently my group filed a complaint on behave of a small church who didn't want to start trouble. The complaint was the church wanted to use the public access channel for their services but the cable comapny told them they were switching the public access channel over to Beta format. For the small church to now use the channel they would have to spend out $14,000 on equipment, money they didn't have. So when I had a meeting with the mayor it came to our attention that not only where the church's complaining but the schools were too. to make a long story short the city told the cable comapny if they did switch to beta that the city would cancel their franchise agreement....so the cable didn't switch formats. If you are going to make up a story, at least get the technology straight. Beta has been dead for a very long time (in technology terms). No one would be switching to Beta. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE NOT true, a digital BETA is out there and is used by a few public access as well as some commerial broadcasters. The cost of digital beta equipment is $14,000 to $16,000 Todd N9OGL |
BETA is gone from the consumer market, but there is some commerical
gear out there and is used by different groups including broadcasters, and public access groups. |
N9OGL wrote: You didn't answer my question. Does the cable company NOT have control over thie own assets? Yes or no wil suffice nicenly, thank-you. The ONLY POWER A CABLE COMAPNY HAS OVER THE CONTENT IS THE AVABILITY OF THE CHANNEL( I.E. SET UP THE TIME THE PROGRAM IS TO AIR) AND THAT'S IT!!! Stop screaming and slow down. You already type like a fool and you only get worse when you act this way. I didn't say the FCC had jurisdiction, Todd. Please stay focused. I said that the COMMUNITIES have the right to determine the nature of the content in thier communities But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel. The cable company is IN the community (or close to it). Gee...You're right, Todd. Threre's one of those "dum### hams badmouthing people on USENET" right now! And PROOF of what I've been saying all along. Well steve if you weren't such an ###hole, perhaps I would treat you a little nicer. No problem, Todd. You're an immature, developmentally delayed adult, and I realize it. I keep prodding you in an attempt to get you to realize your own shortcomings, but you just respond with more screaming and more profanity. In other words, you prove my point. And I am sure if they knew what a swell guy you REALLY are, they wouldn't have bothered. I'm a hell a lot nicer then you think, again if your weren't an ###hole I would be a little nicer. I could care less HOW nice you could be. You're profane, immature and technically incompetent. Call ME all the names you care to, Todd...it WON'T change THOSE facts. And this pertains to your operation of illegal "broadcast stations" how? It don't, I was pointing out that the cable company has been in trouble with the city for repeative violation peoples free speech on the public access channel. And I say they are doing the community a favor by keeping a profane, immature, technically incompetent idiot away from public view. They are doing you a FAVOR Todd, but you keep trying to reprove that you are EXACTLY what everyone else says you are. Doesn't matter, Todd...LOX is not used as a refrigerant because it's an O X I D I Z E R. It makes things burn, in some cases very rapidly (please see any film clip of a Saturn 5 rocket ascending). And if you plan on using LOX A N Y W H E R E near an electrical source, you are introducing an I G N I T I O N source. Now, going back to ELEMENTARY SCHOOL scinence, guess what happens when you mix an oxidizer, an ignition source, and any FUEL...??? ok, then I'll use liquid Nitrogen then. It's only taken you three weeks to wake up to THAT error. Now if we can get you to work on the others...... I said your protocol is several developmental generations behind current technology. That's NOT untrue. The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the amateur band. I am not a Nazi, Todd. And a "new mode of communications" that is several developmental generations BEHIND current technology is NOT what Amateur Radio needs. Steve, K4YZ |
Let's have Toddy use LOX to cool a spark gap xmtr. He can use the
Tesla coil secondary @ 1.4MV and he can convert himself down to his level instead of getting all puffed up on here. |
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote: K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: Obviously someone in Taylorville is unimpressed with your ability to meet community standards, Todd. First of ####ead...(SNIP) Gee...You're right, Todd. Threre's one of those "dum### hams badmouthing people on USENET" right now! And PROOF of what I've been saying all along. I happen to be a very very very old friend of the mayor of this community, before him it was my uncle who ran this town. (my family is very political) Obviously not political enough. I'm standing by, ready to assist in Todd's upcoming first political race. I have slogans for the bumperstickers all set to go: "Vote For Todd O'Dochertaigh, you f--king c--ksuckers!" or "A Vote For Todd Is A Vote For D--khead" Secondly the cable company has been in trouble with the mayors office because of this matter. Recently my group filed a complaint on behave of a small church who didn't want to start trouble. On "behalf", Todd. And I am sure if they knew what a swell guy you REALLY are, they wouldn't have bothered. The mind boggles at Todd speaking on behalf (or even behave) of any religious group. Dave K8MN |
N9OGL wrote:
Steve K4YZ wrote: Doesn't matter, Todd...LOX is not used as a refrigerant because it's an O X I D I Z E R. It makes things burn, in some cases very rapidly (please see any film clip of a Saturn 5 rocket ascending). And if you plan on using LOX A N Y W H E R E near an electrical source, you are introducing an I G N I T I O N source. Now, going back to ELEMENTARY SCHOOL scinence, guess what happens when you mix an oxidizer, an ignition source, and any FUEL...??? ok, then I'll use liquid Nitrogen then. I hear Emily Litella pronouncing, "Never mind" over Todd's adjustment. I said your protocol is several developmental generations behind current technology. That's NOT untrue. The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the amateur band. Steve keeps attempting to use his power to keep Todd from looking like a complete boob. Dave K8MN |
N9OGL wrote:
But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel. "doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel." Can someone make an attempt to decipher that? |
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: N9OGL wrote: But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel. "doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel." Can someone make an attempt to decipher that? The cable company doesn't want anyone using the public access channel. |
Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the amateur band. Steve keeps attempting to use his power to keep Todd from looking like a complete boob. I'm pedalling as fast as I can, Dave, and I think I am catching up...He's cutting back on his caps locked rants and us of "mother######" and "dick####"... Maybe...just m a y b e .......... Steve, K4YZ |
Jim wrote:
http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...tion/about.htm States that a ham with a vanity call of N9FU (no profanity intended) established this pirate broadcasting company with him! From that link: ABOUT LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION IS A NON-PROFIT ORGINIZATION WHICH PROMOTES THEATER, TELECOMMUNICATIONS, AND THE PREFORMING ARTS....(SNIP) But obviously does not support basic reading, writing and grammar skills...which leads one to ask how can someone enjoy the "preforming arts" if they are illiterate? LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS. Ahhhhhhhhh....Here it's "Daugherty"... "I'VE ALWAYS WANTED TO ENTERTAIN PEOPLE" SAID TODD DAUGHERTY CEO/PRESIDENT OF LANGLEY PARK. Well, then, Toddy m'boy, You've succeeded! "LANGLEY PARK WILL CREATE A PLACE WHERE IDEAS CAN ROAM FREE AND PEOPLE CAN SHOW OFF THEIR TALENTS" Hence this picture of you? http://img61.exs.cx/img61/6216=AD/steve5ye.jpg Some talent. =20 Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: Jim wrote: LANGLEY PARK WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1999-2000 BY TODD DAUGHERTY N9OGL AND JIM BEUSINGER N9FU ALONG WITH OTHER HAM OPERATORS. Ahhhhhhhhh....Here it's "Daugherty"... OH ME! How could I have missed THIS one..?!?! For the last two weeks it's been "MF hams" this and "MF hams that" from Todd... But HERE, when it serves his greater ego to do so, it's a point of pride. And of course we have Todd admitting that yes, he IS one of those very same hams that he's been foul-mouthing all month... Two faces...one head...Waddayaknowbouthat...?!?!? Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com