bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

The fact of the matter is that except in the most aggrevious
warfare, more Americans die on the highways at home than do
Servicemen.

And heroes all of them, defending the country.

"""Sorry Hans, a run-over Jay-Walker IS a Veteran!!!""" Hi!

The point beig, Brain, that civilians die in the course of both
"peacetime" and states of war too.

Do a bit of history research on "Maritime Marine", "Civil Air
Patrol" and "Office of Civilian Defense" during WW2.

CAP "civilians" still lose their lives "in the line of duty", and
they weren't even getting paid for it.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

The fact of the matter is that except in the most aggrevious
warfare, more Americans die on the highways at home than do
Servicemen.

And heroes all of them, defending the country.

"""Sorry Hans, a run-over Jay-Walker IS a Veteran!!!""" Hi!

The point beig, Brain, that civilians die in the course of both
"peacetime" and states of war too.

Then they would have been wise to have stepped up to the plate and
enlisted.

Do a bit of history research on "Maritime Marine", "Civil Air
Patrol" and "Office of Civilian Defense" during WW2.

CAP "civilians" still lose their lives "in the line of duty",
and
they weren't even getting paid for it.

Then they did something horribly, horribly wrong.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

The fact of the matter is that except in the most
aggrevious
warfare, more Americans die on the highways at home than do
Servicemen.

And heroes all of them, defending the country.

"""Sorry Hans, a run-over Jay-Walker IS a Veteran!!!"""
Hi!

The point beig, Brain, that civilians die in the course of
both
"peacetime" and states of war too.

Then they would have been wise to have stepped up to the plate and
enlisted.

Do a bit of history research on "Maritime Marine", "Civil Air
Patrol" and "Office of Civilian Defense" during WW2.

CAP "civilians" still lose their lives "in the line of duty",
and
they weren't even getting paid for it.

Then they did something horribly, horribly wrong.

Such as...?!?!

People die every day doing whatever it is they do 100% safely.

Like the local mother of two who was stopped at a traffic light.
She was sober, alert, had her seat belt with shoulder belt on. A drunk
driver careened through the intersection and struck her sqaure in the
door.

3000+ people died three years ago just becasue they went to work
that day.

Did THEY do something "horribly, horribly wrong"...?!?!

There's absolutely no guarantee to life other than you are going
to die. What you do with your life until you do is to some degree in
your own hands. The rest is the roll of the dice.

Steve, K4YZ

From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 4:37 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

So, is lie #16 the conversation with a former
colleague of Len's? Or
is lie #16 Steve's tenure on RRAP? Or is it actually
lies #16 and #17?

Neither, but nice try.

Steve, you lied. The only question is which time?

The conversation with a former colleague of Len's?

The length of tenure on RRAP?

Or both.

Fess up.

Well well...Looks like I made an error in math. My
bust.

Well, well...it took you Quitesometime to fess up.

Now where is Len's apology?

Right behind HIS apology to this NG for years of lying,
accusing,
deceiving and antagonism, Brian...Right behind!

Just hold your breath and wait!

Steve, K4YZ

Well, well. So much for your "strength of conviction."

Lennie is YEARS BEHIND coming clean on his errors, lies and
deceit, Brian... Y E A R S ! ! ! !

The old, "two wrongs makes a right" defense.

I have to disagree. Robeson is so caught up in his personal
hatred of me that he cannot possibly discuss anything
rationally...or even act rationally. He is the constant
antagonist of ANYONE who disagrees with him.

Case in point is others' opinions. Robeson labels those
as "LIES," perhaps even "deceit" even though those are
just personal opinions. Apparently, in Stevieworld,
only Stevie Robeson has the "truth." Ergo, in the logic
of Stevieworld, ALL contrary (to Robeson's) opinions
are "LIES" as well as "errors" and "deceit."

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

However, Robeson seems to take everything against his
opinions as a "personal attack." He then respond but
that response IS a personal attack on his perceived
attacker. He hasn't yet learned that such is NOT the
way discussions go in our society.

On the other hand, if Robeson has been so brainwashed
by the remaining amateur radio membership organization
that he believes ONLY what they say, then any negative
against him is held AS a personal attack. That is NOT
the fault of anyone voicing a negative opinion against
Robeson's, it is Robeson's fault.

You won't do what you know to be right because someone else isn't
doing
what you know to be right.

I AM, repeat AM doing "what's right".

Repeating something doesn't make it any more true or false. But in
this case, it makes lies #19 and #20.

Quite true, but Robeson hasn't learned to communicate
with rational people yet. He simply drives home a
blunt point that HE IS RIGHT with no proof or other
reference that it IS right.

That's either a monstrous ego at work there or it can
be a curious mixture of the reasons I mentioned just
before. Either way, it is not right...to rational
people.

You and Leonard are lairs, Brian.

That's a falsehood, a LIE. Robeson's only justification
of that is that HE IS RIGHT. It is his antagonist style
which is so off-putting to so many...no justification,
just the personal insult and LIE combination.

You don't tell the truth. YOU
make glaring errors, and then when I make a simple one, all of a
sudden
you think your slates are wiped clean.

Robeson's simple LIE-insult in the first quoted sentence
is an absolute statement. It is without any presented
proof...therefore it is Robeson's OPINION. However, any
of Robeson's OPINIONS are - in his communications here -
perfectly "right." HE IS RIGHT in Stevieworld. Problem
is, everyone else is NOT in Stevieworld (wherever that is).

Lessee? 30 hours before Len makes an appearance in one of your
demented threads, you're chiding him for disapproving of what you
said.
Then you have a conversation with a claimed colleague of Len's years
and years before you ever heard of Len. Both cases were smear
campaigns against Len, and you say you make simple errors???

Sorry...Doesn't work that way.

That's right Steve, it doesn't work that way. What you said was an
outright lie.

Robeson's HATRED and ANGER seem to be overriding any
rationality here. Robeson cannot prove the existance
of this "fitrep" determiner. He has compounded that
by numerous statements, none of which have any proof
of truth. [see my previous message on this...]

Actually, several years ago, Robeson tried the same
ploy and embellished that until nearly in the form it
was recently. That was unproveable then and his
claim is unproveable now.

None of this discussion has ANYTHING to do with amateur
radio policy. It is just the usual Stevie psychotic
activity in here, part of his general misuse of the
newsgroup as his own personal "battleground."

Robeson doesn't seem capable of acknowledging that he
ever does anything wrong. That seems to increase his
anger quotient and his personal insults grow to
incomprehensible blatherings of Hatred and Anger.

Robeson is an EXAMPLE of a modern U.S. Amateur Extra.

Other Amateur Extras seem unable to take any strong
action to stop his pollution of all threads in this
newsgroup. All threads eventually turn into Robeson's
insults of all his "opponents" in any discussion.
A few have made negative comments to his style, notably
Hans Brakob. Responses to those by Robeson were less
than civil and uncomplimentary.

wrote:
From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 4:37 pm

Case in point is others' opinions. Robeson labels those
as "LIES," perhaps even "deceit" even though those are
just personal opinions. Apparently, in Stevieworld,
only Stevie Robeson has the "truth." Ergo, in the logic
of Stevieworld, ALL contrary (to Robeson's) opinions
are "LIES" as well as "errors" and "deceit."

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

Opinions are just opinions when they start off "My opinion on the
subject is..." Or "I think it would be better if..." THOSE are
opinions.

Lies and deceit are things like "The ARRL BoD is dishonest" or
"ARES won't be able to respond becasue their members are too old and
oover obligated

Quite true, but Robeson hasn't learned to communicate
with rational people yet. He simply drives home a
blunt point that HE IS RIGHT with no proof or other
reference that it IS right.

(A) Neither Leonard H Anderson or Brian P Burke are rational.
They both make statements in public forum contrary to the presence of
data that contradicts their assertions.

(B) Nice try on the "no proof" assertions, Lennie....And only
MORE proof that I am correct in calling you a liar.

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

Huge snip of ususal obnxious verbosity to.....

Other Amateur Extras seem unable to take any strong
action to stop his pollution of all threads in this
newsgroup. All threads eventually turn into Robeson's
insults of all his "opponents" in any discussion.
A few have made negative comments to his style, notably
Hans Brakob. Responses to those by Robeson were less
than civil and uncomplimentary.

While I have no doubt that not everyone approves of my "up in your
face" methology of dealing with the two of you, I DO notice that NONE
of them, other than to acknowledge your "First Amendment Right" to do
so, "support" YOUR presence here, Lennie.

It dosen't take one of those "inquiring minds" to know why....

You are both liiars.

You don't do what you'll say you'll do.

They're tired of the same "Back in 1953...." war satories.

You'e deceitful.

It really is THAT simple.

Steve, K4YZ

From: "K4YZ" on Mon,Apr 18 2005 2:26 am

wrote:
From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 4:37 pm

Case in point is others' opinions. Robeson labels those
as "LIES," perhaps even "deceit" even though those are
just personal opinions. Apparently, in Stevieworld,
only Stevie Robeson has the "truth." Ergo, in the logic
of Stevieworld, ALL contrary (to Robeson's) opinions
are "LIES" as well as "errors" and "deceit."

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

Opinions are just opinions when they start off "My opinion on the
subject is..." Or "I think it would be better if..." THOSE are
opinions.

Stop blabbering like a petulant child. Get with the program
in computer-modem communications. YOU DON'T DO WHAT YOU
YOU JUST COMMANDED.

You are NOT a "commander" of a damn thing in here. You can't
control yourself or your angry, petulant, emotional outbursts.

Lies and deceit are things like "The ARRL BoD is dishonest" or
"ARES won't be able to respond becasue their members are too old and
oover obligated

"...oover obligated..." Finish what you write.

Those are OPINIONS. No "law" requires prefacing "every"
OPINION with your orders of the day. Kiss off.


Quite true, but Robeson hasn't learned to communicate
with rational people yet. He simply drives home a
blunt point that HE IS RIGHT with no proof or other
reference that it IS right.

(A) Neither Leonard H Anderson or Brian P Burke are rational.
They both make statements in public forum contrary to the presence of
data that contradicts their assertions.

WHAT "data?" Robeson has presented NO "data."

(B) Nice try on the "no proof" assertions, Lennie....And only
MORE proof that I am correct in calling you a liar.

Robeson has NO "proof." All Robeson has is a seemingly
unending list of personal insults against all those who
disagree with him.

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

NO ONE is any "marionette."

Your (usual) petulant outburst in another demonstrated
fit of anger shows you have little "proof" of anything
but your own anger and hatred of anyone saying the least
negative thing about your own opinions.

Huge snip of ususal obnxious verbosity to.....

Other Amateur Extras seem unable to take any strong
action to stop his pollution of all threads in this
newsgroup. All threads eventually turn into Robeson's
insults of all his "opponents" in any discussion.
A few have made negative comments to his style, notably
Hans Brakob. Responses to those by Robeson were less
than civil and uncomplimentary.

While I have no doubt that not everyone approves of my "up in
your
face" methology of dealing with the two of you, I DO notice that NONE
of them, other than to acknowledge your "First Amendment Right" to do
so, "support" YOUR presence here, Lennie.

Tsk. Robeson should have all kinds of "doubt." :-)

Robeson not only acts like the sociopath but has a
monstrous EGO thinking that his "in your face" insult-
fest is "approved" by those that count. :-)

It dosen't take one of those "inquiring minds" to know why....

You are both liiars.

What is a "liiar?" List the "LIES" supposedly said in here.

You don't do what you'll say you'll do.

Robeson has yet to "do what he says he will do." :-)

Namely PROVE the existance of this imaginary "fitrep"
person he says evaluated me at NADC 34 years ago. :-)

Robeson has yet to acknowledge that the Department of
Defense DOES DIRECT MARS...even when given the link to the
latest document issued by the DoD.

Robeson has yet to state the WHEN and WHERE of his mighty
"hostile action" experiences.

They're tired of the same "Back in 1953...." war satories.

Well, regardless of the anger-induced typos ("satories"),
I did work big-time HF communications for three straight
years beginning in 1953. Robeson has NOT done anything
close to that. Robeson has NEVER worked in electronics
engineering as either civilian or military member, yet
presumes to be "knowledgeable" about engineering after a
very short-term job as a purchasing agent!

You'e deceitful.

Present the "proof." Describe the WHY where ALL MUST
do exactly what they (allegedly) "promised" years ago.

Robeson does little else but hurl personal insults at
those who do not agree with him. That gets him the
attention he seems to be desperately seeking. Robeson
manages to turn EVERY thread in this newsgroup into his
own "FIGHT" with all those who disagree with him.

It really is THAT simple.

Robeson IS "that simple."

Robeson is an EXAMPLE of a modern U.S. Amateur Extra.

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Mon,Apr 18 2005 2:26 am

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

Opinions are just opinions when they start off "My opinion on
the
subject is..." Or "I think it would be better if..." THOSE are
opinions.

Stop blabbering like a petulant child. Get with the program
in computer-modem communications. YOU DON'T DO WHAT YOU
YOU JUST COMMANDED.

I didn't "COMMAND" anything, Lennie.

You are NOT a "commander" of a damn thing in here.

Whoa! Profantiy! I am so impressed, Lennie! You are so strong
when you start hurling profanity in a fitful rage!

You can't
control yourself or your angry, petulant, emotional outbursts.

You insist I am in an angry, petulant mode, Lennie, but from
what...?!?! "Expressing my opinion"...?!?!

That "NCTA" double standard sneaking in???

Lies and deceit are things like "The ARRL BoD is dishonest" or
"ARES won't be able to respond becasue their members are too old and
oover obligated

"...oover obligated..." Finish what you write.

That was it, Lennie.

Those are OPINIONS. No "law" requires prefacing "every"
OPINION with your orders of the day. Kiss off.

OH! Now THAT was a COMMAND, Lennie! And one that even further
endears you to the ones you would seek to dominate and rule.

Too bad were on to you, eh,...?!?!

(A) Neither Leonard H Anderson or Brian P Burke are rational.
They both make statements in public forum contrary to the presence
of
data that contradicts their assertions.

WHAT "data?" Robeson has presented NO "data."

Sure I have!

Brian insisted ARES's usefulness and ability to respond to calls
was "overblown".

In the last week alone I have provided no fewer than four
references that absolutely disprove his assertion, and all of those
from news releases within DAYS of his comments.

(B) Nice try on the "no proof" assertions, Lennie....And only
MORE proof that I am correct in calling you a liar.

Robeson has NO "proof." All Robeson has is a seemingly
unending list of personal insults against all those who
disagree with him.

There's no "unending list of personal insults", Lennie.

All I have to do is recite what YOU have said and what YOU have
said you'd do then point out that you've not done it to make my point.

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

NO ONE is any "marionette."

Brain P Burke is. He's yours, as a matter of fact.

But he may get jealous...You've started tossing affectionate
sounding conversation in Todd's direction...We may be ringside for a
cat fight soon!

Your (usual) petulant outburst in another demonstrated
fit of anger shows you have little "proof" of anything
but your own anger and hatred of anyone saying the least
negative thing about your own opinions.

No outburst. That's your imagination running amok, Lennie.

While I have no doubt that not everyone approves of my "up in your
face" methology of dealing with the two of you, I DO notice that
NONE
of them, other than to acknowledge your "First Amendment Right" to
do
so, "support" YOUR presence here, Lennie.

Tsk. Robeson should have all kinds of "doubt."

But why?

Robeson not only acts like the sociopath but has a
monstrous EGO thinking that his "in your face" insult-
fest is "approved" by those that count.

Lennie, you ARE the complete idiot I suggest you are.

In the very paragraph YOU quoted, I stated very clearly that I
"have no doubt" about who does or doesn't approve of my methodology of
dealing with you.

Why would you then make so assinine an assertion as to suggest
that I have some ego to suggest I believe it's "approved"...?!?!

Another snip of ususal pejorative laden rhetoric (that he claims
is only used AGAINST him...)....

Robeson IS "that simple."

Not as "simple" as the alleged ex-radio engineer who makes
assinine assertions based upon quotes that clearly undermine it.

Robeson is an EXAMPLE of a modern U.S. Amateur Extra.



And the IEEE should sue to get you to stop using an IEEE address in
public. You're a humiliation to one and all.

Steve, K4YZ

wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Mon,Apr 18 2005 2:26 am

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

NO ONE is any "marionette."

Robeson is shamed that he could not write a valid schedule with fewer
than the required number of volunteers. He is angry that my opinion
turned out to be correct, as proved by his very own works.

K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 4:37 pm

Case in point is others' opinions. Robeson labels those
as "LIES," perhaps even "deceit" even though those are
just personal opinions. Apparently, in Stevieworld,
only Stevie Robeson has the "truth." Ergo, in the logic
of Stevieworld, ALL contrary (to Robeson's) opinions
are "LIES" as well as "errors" and "deceit."

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

Opinions are just opinions when they start off "My opinion on
the
subject is..."

Is that your official opinion?

Lies and deceit are things like "The ARRL BoD is dishonest" or
"ARES won't be able to respond becasue their members are too old and
oover obligated

Quite true, but Robeson hasn't learned to communicate
with rational people yet. He simply drives home a
blunt point that HE IS RIGHT with no proof or other
reference that it IS right.

(A) Neither Leonard H Anderson or Brian P Burke are rational.
They both make statements in public forum contrary to the presence of
data that contradicts their assertions.

Yet the data also contradict your assertions, and therein is where
one's opinion can be sourced. Even your own attempt at writing a
simple schedule for an ARES exercise refuted your very claims that ARES
alawys satisfies customers needs.

(B) Nice try on the "no proof" assertions, Lennie....And only
MORE proof that I am correct in calling you a liar.

I am correct in calling you a liar.

Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.

Speak of avoiding...

You are free to try rewriting the duty roster for that ARES exercise.
But please do adhere to customers expectations.

Huge snip of ususal obnxious verbosity to.....

That would be "usual."

Other Amateur Extras seem unable to take any strong
action to stop his pollution of all threads in this
newsgroup. All threads eventually turn into Robeson's
insults of all his "opponents" in any discussion.
A few have made negative comments to his style, notably
Hans Brakob. Responses to those by Robeson were less
than civil and uncomplimentary.

While I have no doubt that not everyone approves of my "up in
your
face" methology of dealing with the two of you, I DO notice that NONE
of them, other than to acknowledge your "First Amendment Right" to do
so, "support" YOUR presence here, Lennie.

It dosen't take one of those "inquiring minds" to know why....

You are both liiars.

You don't do what you'll say you'll do.

They're tired of the same "Back in 1953...." war satories.

You'e deceitful.

It really is THAT simple.

Steve, K4YZ

You've piled on the lies at an uprecedented rate in the past two weeks.
Why would we believe anything you might say today?

wrote:
From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 4:37 pm

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:

So, is lie #16 the conversation with a former
colleague of Len's? Or
is lie #16 Steve's tenure on RRAP? Or is it
actually
lies #16 and #17?

Neither, but nice try.

Steve, you lied. The only question is which time?

The conversation with a former colleague of Len's?

The length of tenure on RRAP?

Or both.

Fess up.

Well well...Looks like I made an error in math. My
bust.

Well, well...it took you Quitesometime to fess up.

Now where is Len's apology?

Right behind HIS apology to this NG for years of lying,
accusing,
deceiving and antagonism, Brian...Right behind!

Just hold your breath and wait!

Steve, K4YZ

Well, well. So much for your "strength of conviction."

Lennie is YEARS BEHIND coming clean on his errors, lies and
deceit, Brian... Y E A R S ! ! ! !

The old, "two wrongs makes a right" defense.

I have to disagree.

I wasn't implying that you were wrong, only that Robeson views you as
wrong, and thusly, he can be as wrong as he needs to be with complete
immunity. In they typical liberal fashion, any means to achieve the
desired end is "good." Like lying about what ARES needs.

Robeson is so caught up in his personal
hatred of me that he cannot possibly discuss anything
rationally...or even act rationally. He is the constant
antagonist of ANYONE who disagrees with him.

Indeed. The moron even harangued me for not giving Coslo grief over
his aborted near-space balloon project. I was characterized as an
antagonist for not exhibiting antagonistic behavio[u]r. Hi. Hi, hi!
What an idiot.

Case in point is others' opinions. Robeson labels those
as "LIES," perhaps even "deceit" even though those are
just personal opinions.

Like the many other assertions that Robeson makes, they are simply
wrong.

Apparently, in Stevieworld,
only Stevie Robeson has the "truth." Ergo, in the logic
of Stevieworld, ALL contrary (to Robeson's) opinions
are "LIES" as well as "errors" and "deceit."

And so his sickness manifests itself.

That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.

Robeson is quite sick, irrational.

However, Robeson seems to take everything against his
opinions as a "personal attack." He then respond but
that response IS a personal attack on his perceived
attacker. He hasn't yet learned that such is NOT the
way discussions go in our society.

He's still having problems figuring out what an antagonist is.
Meanwhile, he's got a fan club from the rra.MISC egging him on.

On the other hand, if Robeson has been so brainwashed
by the remaining amateur radio membership organization
that he believes ONLY what they say, then any negative
against him is held AS a personal attack. That is NOT
the fault of anyone voicing a negative opinion against
Robeson's, it is Robeson's fault.

Robeson has many faults.

You won't do what you know to be right because someone else
isn't
doing
what you know to be right.

I AM, repeat AM doing "what's right".

Repeating something doesn't make it any more true or false. But in
this case, it makes lies #19 and #20.

Quite true, but Robeson hasn't learned to communicate
with rational people yet. He simply drives home a
blunt point that HE IS RIGHT with no proof or other
reference that it IS right.

That's either a monstrous ego at work there or it can
be a curious mixture of the reasons I mentioned just
before. Either way, it is not right...to rational
people.

Nefarious Steve. He could be his own Rap Group.

You and Leonard are lairs, Brian.

That's a falsehood, a LIE. Robeson's only justification
of that is that HE IS RIGHT. It is his antagonist style
which is so off-putting to so many...no justification,
just the personal insult and LIE combination.

Robeson is a liar.

You don't tell the truth. YOU
make glaring errors, and then when I make a simple one, all of a
sudden
you think your slates are wiped clean.

Robeson's simple LIE-insult in the first quoted sentence
is an absolute statement. It is without any presented
proof...therefore it is Robeson's OPINION. However, any
of Robeson's OPINIONS are - in his communications here -
perfectly "right." HE IS RIGHT in Stevieworld. Problem
is, everyone else is NOT in Stevieworld (wherever that is).

I'm just glad that Ed McMahon didn't knock on my door saying that I won
a vacation to Stevieworld.

Lessee? 30 hours before Len makes an appearance in one of your
demented threads, you're chiding him for disapproving of what you
said.
Then you have a conversation with a claimed colleague of Len's years
and years before you ever heard of Len. Both cases were smear
campaigns against Len, and you say you make simple errors???

Sorry...Doesn't work that way.

That's right Steve, it doesn't work that way. What you said was an
outright lie.

Robeson's HATRED and ANGER seem to be overriding any
rationality here. Robeson cannot prove the existance
of this "fitrep" determiner. He has compounded that
by numerous statements, none of which have any proof
of truth. [see my previous message on this...]

He is an irrational being. Perhaps if he came clean on the seven
hostile actions, he could buy a couple of credibility points so sorely
needed.

Actually, several years ago, Robeson tried the same
ploy and embellished that until nearly in the form it
was recently. That was unproveable then and his
claim is unproveable now.

It's the seriousness of the accusation that's important, not the truth
in it (or lack thereof). Like his homosexual and pedophilia inuendo.

None of this discussion has ANYTHING to do with amateur
radio policy. It is just the usual Stevie psychotic
activity in here, part of his general misuse of the
newsgroup as his own personal "battleground."

Robeson doesn't seem capable of acknowledging that he
ever does anything wrong. That seems to increase his
anger quotient and his personal insults grow to
incomprehensible blatherings of Hatred and Anger.

Robeson is an EXAMPLE of a modern U.S. Amateur Extra.

Unfortunately. Yet most other Extra's on RRAP are good with Robeson's
behavio[u]r. Steve farts in church and we're to believe it's incense.

Other Amateur Extras seem unable to take any strong
action to stop his pollution of all threads in this
newsgroup. All threads eventually turn into Robeson's
insults of all his "opponents" in any discussion.
A few have made negative comments to his style, notably
Hans Brakob. Responses to those by Robeson were less
than civil and uncomplimentary.




bb