| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
KØHB wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... ..... my point that you can argue yourself out of any testing via your argument...... No you can't. Yes you can. I fully support a Morse familiarity test. Cross my heart and hope to die! I just don't support a "skill demonstration", unless you want to require a "skill demonstration" of every knowledge area on the test, and deny licenses to everyone who cannot demonstrate all required skills. No other part of the testing is a skill. You can buy a Yeacomwood rig, have other people set up your antenna and setup. You can talk into a microphone, (assuming that people know to mash the PTT or adaptive device that performs the same function) and it will "work". I can buy or download and install the software that I use for PSK31. It's a major stretch to consider that a skill. More like knowledge. But CW is a different matter. You aren't going to read a book and sit down at the key and start sending or receiving Morse. *Thst's* a skill. Even with computer generated Morse and Receiving programs such as CWGet (all which do s so-so job of the mode) it is a valuable skill which can work with minimal equipment. - Mike KB3EIA - |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| BBC Says Morse Code Still Alive and Well In UK | Policy | |||
| Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||