Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: I gave you dates, places, callsigns, Brain. That's far more information on ONE topic than YOU have ever presented on ALL the topics YOU have been challenged on! But nice try! And I gave you the combination to the safe at Ft. Knox. You very well may have. But I ahve no desire to even see Ft Knox from a distance. On the otherhand, YOU have asked for evidence of my MARS participation. You were given all the particulars. In 2003 they were enough for you. In 2005 you can't seem to connect the dots. Your problem, Brain. Your words, your rules, your "etiquette" makes you the liar. Nope. Information was requested...Information provided...Actually, you ALREADY had the information in your hands...A couple years ago, as a matter of fact, and it seemed to be quite adequate for you then. Your own "say so" isn't documentation. Scan the letter of appointment for your "ANCOIC" of Okinawa MARS. Post the link for all to see. There is no "letter of appointment" for such assignments, Brain. But you're certainly welcome to follow the information you were given and see who the ranking and the next-ranking MARS NCO's were at the times I gave you. I guess I am going to just have to sit down with you and teach you some basic math and etiquette, Brain If you knew any. We'll just have to sit down and I'll teach you, Brian. There's a LOT for you to learn, though. You wish to be my mentor? Should I start calling you "Lying Putz!" Why? I am not about to change my name to "Leonard H. Anderson". I don't know why you insist on lying yourself and then trying to make up stories about others lying. Steve, make no mistake, you are a documented liar. There's no mistake, Brain...I'm not. There must be. You've just lied again. Nope. I have made mistakes...Owned up to them, acknowledged them. Hans' current item on the NON-US "military" use of Q signals for example. It was a long stretch, and he had to dig to find that one... Now wait a minute, Slippery Steve. If the manual is for "allied forces" aren't we allied to them as well? Why would we have them communicating with us using one set of protocols, and we to them with another? You've made more dodges recently than the Chrysler plant. Hi! YOU, on the otherhand, have made COUNTLESS errors, and not only NOT acknowledged them, but tried to defend them as "valid". THAT goes from being an "error" to being a "LIE". But we're discussing your errors, your accusations, your words, your rules, your logic, and your lies! I haven't lied. A lie is an intentional effort to decieve. I have made no intentional effort to deceive. Where I have been proven wrong on issues, I have corrected the error and acknowledged it. On the other hand, we have you and Lennie and Y E A R S of stories not only laid bare, but aggressively defended as "right" even when PROVEN wrong. THAT is a lie. And so far, you've not proven that intent. It's pathetic that you can't live up to your own expectations of others. You're not a straw boss anymore, just a strawman. Nope. Sorry, Brain, but no matter how hard you try to shake this, you've not proven a thing. No matter how loud yuo yell or how hard you try to re-direct, you're still a loooooong way behind being truthful. But that's OK....Your kids will read these some day and they'll see what an unethical toad you really are, Brain. I'm sure your children are proud of their daddy. Their daddy isn't lying repeatedly in a public forum. You aren't your childrens father? I am. And I am not lying in a public forum. Hans showed you to be a liar going back a long way. Today's lies are just a continuation of the lying that you started a long, long time ago... There's a difference. Hans found an error. Provided a reference. I acknowledged that and "stood corrected". You dodged! Nope. Dodging is trying to make excuses or redirect from the facts. I admitted that I was wrong and his reference was right. Just the opposite of when YOU said ARES was "overblown" and they'd never respond in a true emergency. I provided media releases of CURRENT events that disproved your assertion. And just the opposite of when you insisted that "all the techs have been chased away"... You've not yet answered "who" allegedly chased them away and where they went. You, on the otherhand, still have not acknowledged your misdeeds going back a loooooooooooooooooooong time before anything I wrote. Again, Slippery Steve, this is about you, your words, your rules, your logic, and your expectations of others being applied to you. So far you've not answered a sngle question about ANY of your assertions, claims or other fables, Brain. On the otherhand I've given you exact information on who/when/where. I've MORE that filled in the blanks for you...You DID ask for "callsigns" initially, and then when you GOT what you wanted, you tried to change the game...Sorry. You fail the test! Your own test! The test you wrote! I ahven't written any "test", brain, so here we have YOU in a fable again... Try again, Brain. You've "proved" that you have the desire to continue your course of mistruths and deceit. Brian P Burke IS a deceitful person. Deal with it. Sucks to be Steven J Robeson/K4ZY/K4CAP/K4MARS I've never been K4ZY, I haven't been K4CAP in 2 years, and I guess we know what your "K4MARS" suggestion is, now don't we, Brain...??? Steve, K4YZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Study of Amateur Radio Demographics | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
Can we count on the French | General | |||
Can we count on the French | General |