Userbeam Remailer wrote:
In article
.net
Dave Heil wrote:


Sure, you have. You were the short fellow with the Stephen

King mask.

No, I haven't.

You haven't what?

Your tour was shorter. You fled.

No, since I never have been there.

Oh! Have it your way: Roger fled.

Guess you don't get out much.

Are you asking me for a date?


No,I hear you only go out with Bertie.

Are you jealous of Bert? Do you feel that he monopolizes my time?


Now, Lurch the Nazi, you seem to see Roger everywhere. You

have

a bad comb-over from what was described to me. And all grey
hair. Too bad you dye your eyebrows, but you probably are

vain

like that.

It'd be strange for Roger Wiseman to have a fixation on my

hair and

eyebrows. It would be far more peculiar for you, a person you

claim not

to be Roger Wiseman to have such a fixation--especially when

you worry

that I don't go out enough.


Well, you are strange. Too bad Roger described what you look
like. And the above is all true.

It'd be odd enough for Roger to be fixated on my hair and eyebrows. It
is even more peculiar for a fellow who has never seen me to be fixated
on them. Am I to gather that you and Roger spend a lot of time
discussing my hair and eyebrows?

Are you entering the big Stephen King look-alike contest this

summer?

No, since I don't look like Steven King.

Don't be modest. You're a shoo-in for first prize.


There you go showing your jealousy of Steven King again.

Oh, not at all. He's the Prince of Creepy and you're the King.


Don't you recognize it?


Lying again. You wrote it.

It takes a foolish, foolish man to deny writing something easily seen by
all. You're a foolish, foolish man.



They most certainly are. None of them has material consisting

of vile,

vulgar references to someone's parents, children or spouse.

None of

them depicts filthy acts of homosexuality, incest or

pedophilia.

Yours, on the other hand...


Are not any worse than your filthy posts.

That's been your problem all along. You fail to see the difference.
You're a sociopath.

Your rights end where they infringe upon mine.


You keep that in mind, Nazi.

Why, I've kept that in mind all along.


You see--there's your problem. You assume that everyone

thinks and acts

like you do. You're socially defective.


You're socailly inept. But that trait permeates your entier
life..ineptness. You would qrm Roger if you ran across him on
the air.


That's just lovely coming from the local filth monger.


Oh, such self righeousness, coming fromsomebody who posts filth
like you do.

Proof?

You're one of
the most unbalanced people I've run into in years, UnWiseman.



Since I'm not "UnWiseman" your opinion is valueless, like you
life. And exactly where did you get your Psychology degree...oh,
that's right you don't have one.


You're a problem to amateur radio


I am? Since I'm not Roger Wiseman, how is that possible?

Oh, I forgot, *wink*, *wink*. If you just happened to be Roger Wiseman,
you're a problem to amateur radio.


and a problem to your community.

Hardly.

Your local law enforcement personnel disagree.

You haven't a family.

Wrong as usual.

Right. Roger Wiseman hasn't a family.

But, neither do you, at least your perverted daddy isn't
diddling the altar boys anymore.

See what I mean about your failure to see the difference? You're a
sociopath without a friend in the world. Is that where your anger at
others comes from, Roger?


Sure, sure, Roger--and you've never had troubles with the FCC

and never

had troubles with local law enforcement. You're a regular

model citizen.

No matter how many times you lie, I'm still not Roger.

No matter how many times you repeat, "I'm still not Roger", you're lying.

And Roger's last "troubles" with the FCC was 5 years ago. Onthe
rest, all you offer is hearsay evidence.

Google isn't hearsay.

And from a proven liar like you, well, nobody can believe a liar
like you.

Your big on the accusation of lying but short on "proven".

*Just like* (blah blah blah)


You wrote it, **** for brains.
Deal with it.

Nbot, UnWiseman.

Dave K8MN