Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 22nd 05, 12:52 PM
G1LVN
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You'll be saying we have to give back the internet 44.x.x.x IP address
range next, OM. We could probably get $billions for a Class A
allocation like that. Yet we don't do we?

  #2   Report Post  
Old April 22nd 05, 01:06 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default


G1LVN wrote:
You'll be saying we have to give back the internet 44.x.x.x IP

address
range next, OM. We could probably get $billions for a Class A
allocation like that. Yet we don't do we?


I'm not sure if that was meant for me (no attributes), but no Sir,
we certainly don't have to surrender an internet address....We can
create new addresses as the circumstances and technology allow.

The electromagnetic spectrum is a very finite resource, however,
and we'll be hard pressed to defend some of our allocations with as
little use as they are getting.

I can't speak for you fellows on that side of the Atlantic,
however I know that any use of the bands above 2.3Ghz on this side is
very rare. I think we will be lucky to maintain even sharing
arangements in the future, let alone keep exclusive allocations.

73

Steve, K4YZ
Winchester, TN

  #3   Report Post  
Old April 25th 05, 11:42 AM
Peter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 22 Apr 2005 05:06:30 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

I know that any use of the bands above 2.3Ghz on this side is
very rare. I think we will be lucky to maintain even sharing
arangements in the future, let alone keep exclusive allocations.


Not so! I've attended several Microwave Update conventions in the USA
and always come away thinking how keen and act

Check the websites of the varous US microwave groups and you'll see
that these bands have lots of activity ... especially up to 10GHz and
increasingly to 47GHz and above.

Try www.ntms.org as a starter!

Peter, G3PHO
  #4   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 05, 12:44 AM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default


G1LVN wrote:
You'll be saying we have to give back the internet 44.x.x.x IP

address
range next, OM. We could probably get $billions for a Class A
allocation like that. Yet we don't do we?


Are you active on 24GHz?

  #5   Report Post  
Old April 23rd 05, 07:47 PM
ZZZZPK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"bb" wrote:

:
: G1LVN wrote:
: You'll be saying we have to give back the internet 44.x.x.x IP
: address
: range next, OM. We could probably get $billions for a Class A
: allocation like that. Yet we don't do we?
:
: Are you active on 24GHz?
:

maybe not yet...but he will /M soon enough :-)



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 September 24th 04 07:12 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Shortwave 0 June 16th 04 08:37 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 January 19th 04 12:57 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 January 18th 04 09:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017