| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ups.com... I "hurl your opinion aside with great force!" As WA6AUD is oft heard to say --- "Sunuvagun!" or "ZUE ZBM2" dit dit de Hans, K0HB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote: From: "K=D8=88B" on Tues,May 3 2005 5:59 pm "bb" wrote The ARRL is about HF radio using Morse Code. Bull****. In the face of REALITY of years of published fact that Brian is right, I "hurl your opinion aside with great force!" Yup, everyone just got through saying that there's a problem attracting Technicians to the organization. No one seems to be able to put their finger on exactly why, only because they reject the -correct- answer (reminds me of the OJ case). And they still wring their hands and bite their knuckles and ask, "Why?" OK, I'll rephrase the answer. The ARRL may not be just about HF radio using Morse Code, but the Technicians think it is. Hi! Sheds a whole new light on the subject. How about that for fair play? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bb" wrote The ARRL may not be just about HF radio using Morse Code, but the Technicians think it is. I think that's probably a reasonably accurate statement. And it is what my PBI is intended to address --- putting ARRL back into "mainstreet amateur radio" where the Technicians live, and connecting with them in the activities that are relevant to them. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
K=D8HB wrote: "bb" wrote The ARRL may not be just about HF radio using Morse Code, but the Technicians think it is. I think that's probably a reasonably accurate statement. But why should they? Almost every aspect of ARRL policy and practice is focused on getting MORE people into Amateur Radio and USING those people in their programs, ie ARES. There's not one sentence, nay one letter in any ARRL policy or program that "disses" anyone because of their level of licensure. And it is what my PBI is intended to address --- putting ARRL back into "mainstreet amateur radio" where the Technicians live, and connecting with them in the activities that are relevant to them. ARES isn't? Special Services Clubs? They've accomodated NCT's at almost every turn...Even most of the League's long time awards have been adapated or modified in some form to accomodate them. I just don't see it. I didn't see it when I was a Novice. Nor when I was a Tech, General, Advanced or Extra. The ARRL is a NATIONAL organization. I think they do the best that they can to help promote Amateur Radio, and if they were to do anything more for the grass roots level, it would be with getting more air-time/print in national media. Several years ago we all got into a turn over how it seems like there are certain mindsets drawn to Amateur Radio...EMS-types, experimenters, "gadget freaks" and competitors. Instead of trying to "recruit" persons from other (most likely disinterested) demographics, why not just capitalize on the ones that seem to have a large drawing? EMS, Aviation, "orienteering" and outdoors types, engineering, etc. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com... Almost every aspect of ARRL policy and practice is focused on getting MORE people into Amateur Radio.... My PBI isn't concerned with "getting more people into Amateur Radio". Instead of trying to "recruit" persons from other (most likely disinterested) demographics, why not just capitalize on the ones that seem to have a large drawing? My PBI has nothing to do with recruiting persons into Amateur Radio. It deals with a program aimed at putting ARRL back on mainstreet where is was when over 50% of "1 year Novices" were card carrying ARRL members. de Hans, K0HB |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: "bb" on Wed,May 4 2005 4:13 pm
wrote: From: "K0HB" on Tues,May 3 2005 5:59 pm "bb" wrote The ARRL is about HF radio using Morse Code. Bull****. In the face of REALITY of years of published fact that Brian is right, I "hurl your opinion aside with great force!" Yup, everyone just got through saying that there's a problem attracting Technicians to the organization. No one seems to be able to put their finger on exactly why, only because they reject the -correct- answer (reminds me of the OJ case). And they still wring their hands and bite their knuckles and ask, "Why?" It's awful. Those olde-tymers just CAN'T understand why all the newcomers DON'T worship the olde-tymers' ideals of long ago. Hell, I'm OLDER than most of them and I STARTED on HF...but NOT doing a bit of "CW." :-) OK, I'll rephrase the answer. The ARRL may not be just about HF radio using Morse Code, but the Technicians think it is. Hi! Sheds a whole new light on the subject. How about that for fair play? Works for me. :-) Does definitely NOT work for those olde-tyme morsemen locked into the standards and practices of seven decades ago...they're still scratching their balding heads wondering why the rest of the radio world gave up on "CW." Well, they have their imaginary universes locked up in their heads. They seem to be happy in their status quondam... |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote Does definitely NOT work for those olde-tyme morsemen locked into the standards and practices of seven decades ago...they're still scratching their balding heads wondering why the rest of the radio world gave up on "CW." Armenian judges gave it a 9.8 on the Olympic Troll-O-Meter, but they were over-ruled by the umpires in instant replay, who award it a 2.1. The Armenian judges lodged a formal protest! It was sufficiently trollish, of course, but way too obvious. It was poorly written, poorly executed, and was so incredibly lame as to lack the true drawing power of a really masterful troll. Maybe as high as a 2.3 for the sheer stupidity of the premise, but a 9.8? Never! The Armenian judges tear their hair out, throw their balalaikas down in dismay, and perform the traditional Armenian Dismay Chant! They demand a recount! Regards, Hans, K0HB Lord High Keeper of the Troll-O-Meter 0 2 4 6 8 10 \ \ \ \ \ \ TROLL-O-METER |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where is the PBI at now, Hans?
- Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Michael Coslo" wrote Where is the PBI at now, Hans? It's here and at QRZ.COM forum for open-comment. It's in the hands of W5JBP and the Dakota Division elected leadership for feedback. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|