![]() |
.... no, I think Haynie has it right, read the whole article... code is
no longer of any importance and the ancient amateurs could not even pass the test given today--READ THE ARTICLE! John "Dave Heil" wrote in message k.net... John Smith wrote: Len: A direct quote from Jim Haynie, "The ARRL president asserted that many Amateur Extra class licensees couldn't pass today's Element 4 examination if they had to..." Complete article at: http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2004/05/22/1/?nc=1 Haynie's mistake is in assuming that because he might have trouble passing it, many others would also have difficulty. Dave K8MN |
|
|
John Smith wrote:
A direct quote from Jim Haynie, "The ARRL president asserted that many Amateur Extra class licensees couldn't pass today's Element 4 examination if they had to..." Well, some of them couldn't, anyway. The same is true of some hams in every license class, and has been true for some hams at least as long as I've been aware of ham radio. But I'm not one of those that W5JBP was speaking about. Since I got my ham license 37-1/2 years ago (October 1967, age 13), I've always been able to pass the tests for the license I hold. Since 1970 (age 16), that's been the Extra. Every couple of months I do an online practice test just to make sure. |
John Smith wrote:
... no, I think Haynie has it right, read the whole article... code is no longer of any importance Bull, that's NOT what he said. and the ancient amateurs could not even pass the test given today-- So? What's the big deal? If I had to be retested I'd simply memorize the question pools like everybody else does these days. The EE-types wouldn't even do that, they's just sit down and pass it. Like Haynie said "passing a ham exam does not make you an engineer." Which is to say that passing the writtens isn't much more than a traditional rite of passage. Always have been for that matter. READ THE ARTICLE! I read the article. Now you tune around the bottom ends of the bands for a reality check. w3rv |
Haynie said:
1) "It's not that Amateur Radio is dumbed down," he said. "People like me have failed to keep up, and if you look in your heart, you're going to say the same thing." 2) "...if you want people to come out of that examination room in here to be able to design circuits--you're in the wrong hobby." 3) "I said, if we come down on the side of code, we're going to make the no-code people mad, and if we come down on the side of the no-code, we're going to make the code people mad..." 4) "...he predicted that the Commission will never reinstate higher code speed requirements as some have requested." 5) "The FCC is not going to go back to 13 and 20 words per minute, and you can take that to the bank," he predicted. "It's not going to happen." The Commission went with the single 5 WPM requirement because it was "sick and tired" of dealing with medical waivers, he said. Although he has become a pretty smart "politician" and "diplomat"--it is obvious code is given very little if any importance. Now you can argue his words anyway you like--but you can't find one word of his which places ANY importance on it... He HAS said old amateurs have lost sense of reality, that is right there in no. 1) ... argue that anyway you like--into looking like a fool... John wrote in message oups.com... John Smith wrote: ... no, I think Haynie has it right, read the whole article... code is no longer of any importance Bull, that's NOT what he said. and the ancient amateurs could not even pass the test given today-- So? What's the big deal? If I had to be retested I'd simply memorize the question pools like everybody else does these days. The EE-types wouldn't even do that, they's just sit down and pass it. Like Haynie said "passing a ham exam does not make you an engineer." Which is to say that passing the writtens isn't much more than a traditional rite of passage. Always have been for that matter. READ THE ARTICLE! I read the article. Now you tune around the bottom ends of the bands for a reality check. w3rv |
John Smith wrote:
Haynie mentioned you in no 1), someone who won't admit they are killing the hobby... you aren't anything but a self-centered jerk with a big ego and self-opinion, And you aren't anything but a know-nothing cber who couldn't pass the exam for a ham license if your miserable life depended upon it. |
From: "John Smith" on Wed 8 Jun 2005 18:03
Let me see if I have all of your "facts" straight: 1) there is no problem 2) old farts are cutting edge techs 3) one look will tell you how "progressive" amateur radio is 4) everything just looks wrong, it is really right 5) code is important 6) ARRL is wrong 7) Haynie is wrong 8) FCC is wrong ... yeah, right! John "Dave Heil" wrote in message link.net... John, you forgot one: 9) Leonard is always wrong :-) |
From: "K4YZ" on Jun 8, 5:14 am
I didn't get any farther than this to see what yet anotehr moronic anti-Amateur Radio rant this was. Yet another validation of my claim that Leonard H. Anderson is a chronic, pathological liar. ...the sun sets on the Tomb of the Unknown Solder as a solitary figure in a patch-adorned flight suit slowly paces out his lonely path of anger, J-38 in one hand, bayonetted USMC soldering iron in the other. Pre-recorded marine marches softly fill the air, interspersed with dits and dahs of a few PCTA morsebirds not yet extinct. The Tomb of the Unknown Solder is a lonely place, deep in the valley of neuroses, anger, and frustration. The single sentinel counts cadennce to himself, muttering "flux you, flux you" between the slow steps. His fists are clenched, eager to do bottle but only sipping a cup of unkindness. It is sad but the sentinel at the Tomb of the Unknown Solder keeps going. He does not know why and that is the tragedy. The sun slowly sets on the Tomb of the Unknown Solder leaving only the red light of fire in the eyes of the muttering sentinel. Those glow in the dark like LED pilot lights. Hatred lives on in his twilight of despair. Temper fry. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com