Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... wrote: wrote: wrote: [snip] FCC may look at all this and just draw the line. Note how, in the 2000 restructuring, they outlawed multiple-choice code tests.... Wasn't it the council of VECs who made that decision? I believe that Part 97 does not specify how the 5wpm test is to be administered. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee Flint" wrote Wasn't it the council of VECs who made that decision? I believe that Part 97 does not specify how the 5wpm test is to be administered. I think you're correct Dee. The FCC rules are silent on the form of actual examination: §97.503 Element standards. (a) A telegraphy examination must be sufficient to prove that the examinee has the ability to send correctly by hand and to receive correctly by ear texts in the international Morse code at not less than the prescribed speed, using all the letters of the alphabet, numerals 0-9, period, comma, question mark, slant mark and prosigns AR, BT and SK. Element 1: 5 words per minute. Interestingly, the NCVEC has chosen to ignore the "ability to send correctly by hand" clause of the rules. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Come sit by the fire and warm your bones. Let's enjoy a warm bracing drink and a few tales. "The wind was picking up, clouds were rolling in, my hands were numb, nose was running, I had to pee, and I was thinking of heading for the dock when..." |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "Dee Flint" wrote Wasn't it the council of VECs who made that decision? I believe that P= art 97 does not specify how the 5wpm test is to be administered. I think you're correct Dee. The FCC rules are silent on the form of actu= al examination: =A797.503 Element standards. (a) A telegraphy examination must be sufficient to prove that the examine= e has the ability to send correctly by hand and to receive correctly by ear tex= ts in the international Morse code at not less than the prescribed speed, using= all the letters of the alphabet, numerals 0-9, period, comma, question mark, = slant mark and prosigns AR, BT and SK. Element 1: 5 words per minute. Interestingly, the NCVEC has chosen to ignore the "ability to send correc= tly by hand" clause of the rules. Back before VE days the FCC examiners often skipped past the sending test too. It's been a long time and the details are fuzzy in my mind at this late point but when I went for my Extra the examiner called off the receiving test about a minute and a half into it and ignored the sending test. Maybe that was when I went for my General . . ? One or the other. 73, de Hans, K0HB -- Come sit by the fire and warm your bones. Let's enjoy a warm bracing drin= k and a few tales. "The wind was picking up, clouds were rolling in, my hands wer= e numb, nose was running, I had to pee, and I was thinking of heading for the dock when..." .. . Mom hollered out the window "Don't you even THINK about peeing on that bush and get back in here!" w3rv |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: We've been telling you that your lies and deceit are unwelcome for years and you don't seem to hear it. But yours are welcomed and enjoyed by all. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message ink.net... "Dee Flint" wrote Wasn't it the council of VECs who made that decision? I believe that Part 97 does not specify how the 5wpm test is to be administered. I think you're correct Dee. The FCC rules are silent on the form of actual examination: §97.503 Element standards. (a) A telegraphy examination must be sufficient to prove that the examinee has the ability to send correctly by hand and to receive correctly by ear texts in the international Morse code at not less than the prescribed speed, using all the letters of the alphabet, numerals 0-9, period, comma, question mark, slant mark and prosigns AR, BT and SK. Element 1: 5 words per minute. Interestingly, the NCVEC has chosen to ignore the "ability to send correctly by hand" clause of the rules. Probably just following the example of the FCC itself. I have read that the FCC dropped the sending test as it was rare for someone to be unable to send even though they could receive. The more common scenario is that most people can send faster than they can receive anyway. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx |