Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
Old June 10th 05, 02:20 AM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dee Flint" wrote


Wasn't it the council of VECs who made that decision? I believe that Part 97
does not specify how the 5wpm test is to be administered.


I think you're correct Dee. The FCC rules are silent on the form of actual
examination:

§97.503 Element standards.

(a) A telegraphy examination must be sufficient to prove that the examinee has
the ability to send correctly by hand and to receive correctly by ear texts in
the international Morse code at not less than the prescribed speed, using all
the letters of the alphabet, numerals 0-9, period, comma, question mark, slant
mark and prosigns AR, BT and SK.
Element 1: 5 words per minute.

Interestingly, the NCVEC has chosen to ignore the "ability to send correctly by
hand" clause of the rules.

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
Come sit by the fire and warm your bones. Let's enjoy a warm bracing drink and a
few tales. "The wind was picking up, clouds were rolling in, my hands were numb,
nose was running, I had to pee, and I was thinking of heading for the dock
when..."






  #3   Report Post  
Old June 10th 05, 03:04 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default



K=D8HB wrote:
"Dee Flint" wrote


Wasn't it the council of VECs who made that decision? I believe that P=

art 97
does not specify how the 5wpm test is to be administered.


I think you're correct Dee. The FCC rules are silent on the form of actu=

al
examination:

=A797.503 Element standards.

(a) A telegraphy examination must be sufficient to prove that the examine=

e has
the ability to send correctly by hand and to receive correctly by ear tex=

ts in
the international Morse code at not less than the prescribed speed, using=

all
the letters of the alphabet, numerals 0-9, period, comma, question mark, =

slant
mark and prosigns AR, BT and SK.
Element 1: 5 words per minute.

Interestingly, the NCVEC has chosen to ignore the "ability to send correc=

tly by
hand" clause of the rules.


Back before VE days the FCC examiners often skipped past the sending
test too. It's been a long time and the details are fuzzy in my mind at
this late point but when I went for my Extra the examiner called off
the receiving test about a minute and a half into it and ignored the
sending test. Maybe that was when I went for my General . . ? One or
the other.


73, de Hans, K0HB
--
Come sit by the fire and warm your bones. Let's enjoy a warm bracing drin=

k and a
few tales. "The wind was picking up, clouds were rolling in, my hands wer=

e numb,
nose was running, I had to pee, and I was thinking of heading for the dock
when..."


.. . Mom hollered out the window "Don't you even THINK about peeing on
that bush and get back in here!"

w3rv

  #6   Report Post  
Old June 12th 05, 10:47 PM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default



K4YZ wrote:

We've been telling you that your lies and deceit are unwelcome for
years and you don't seem to hear it.


But yours are welcomed and enjoyed by all.

  #7   Report Post  
Old June 10th 05, 12:10 PM
Dee Flint
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Dee Flint" wrote


Wasn't it the council of VECs who made that decision? I believe that
Part 97 does not specify how the 5wpm test is to be administered.


I think you're correct Dee. The FCC rules are silent on the form of
actual examination:

§97.503 Element standards.

(a) A telegraphy examination must be sufficient to prove that the examinee
has the ability to send correctly by hand and to receive correctly by ear
texts in the international Morse code at not less than the prescribed
speed, using all the letters of the alphabet, numerals 0-9, period, comma,
question mark, slant mark and prosigns AR, BT and SK.
Element 1: 5 words per minute.

Interestingly, the NCVEC has chosen to ignore the "ability to send
correctly by hand" clause of the rules.


Probably just following the example of the FCC itself. I have read that the
FCC dropped the sending test as it was rare for someone to be unable to send
even though they could receive. The more common scenario is that most
people can send faster than they can receive anyway.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
197 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (23-NOV-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 November 28th 04 01:46 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Policy 1 June 26th 04 02:07 AM
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 0 April 5th 04 05:20 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews General 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017