Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 6th 05, 02:46 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

.... absolutely not, that is why ham radio has failed, the old guys keep
trying to turn it into a darn religion with a bunch of traditions (or is
that an A.A. meeting?)...
We need some young active technical people to bring some technology to
the focus in this hobby and breathe some life back into it...

Warmest regards,
John

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote in message
ups.com...
KC8GXW wrote:
But you still have to pay the VE fee, and have earned that
Tech in the first place. Not a giveaway or a free upgrade.

73 de Jim, N2EY

I was just being sarcastic because I have been told I have a
give away tech license!


Well, whoever told you that was full of beans and didn't know
what s/he was talking about. Probably just sour grapes.

73 de Jim, N2EY

I said that. And I mean it. The tests today are a joke. Why you
ask? Because the questions and answers are right there in front of the
person. Sure he has to study a lot of questions. But there they are
on the test. A give away.

And lets not even talk about the CW situation.

It's NOT numbers we need, it people that respect the traditions of
ham radio and want to continue them. Its people that love ham radio
and don't want to use to to order a pizza.

Call me old fashioned and out of touch. It won't be the first time.

Dan/W4NTI




  #2   Report Post  
Old June 6th 05, 01:25 AM
Cmd Buzz Corey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

John Smith wrote:
... absolutely not, that is why ham radio has failed, the old guys keep
trying to turn it into a darn religion with a bunch of traditions (or is
that an A.A. meeting?)...
We need some young active technical people to bring some technology to
the focus in this hobby and breathe some life back into it...


So, are you a ham?
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 7th 05, 12:01 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello, John

You've seen technical knowledge amongst the new folks? Glad you've seen
some. As to me, I like to rag-chew. Like I did with that professor from
the U of R concerning theoretical physics. Of course, he's an old guy too
....

My neighbor called me again last week. Make that week before last.

Seems her computer is on the fritz. The last time she had taken it to a
"tech" who simply ran the restore disk. No more partitions - and he didn't
even put the antivirus nor firewall back in! It took me two trips and
probably 3 hours to fix the bloody thing. Not to mention putting a second
partition on the drive and trying to organize it a bit.

She got a "copy" of XP (notice the quotes - take it any way you wish). This
was perhaps 4 months ago.

Well, she called (it will be two weeks this coming Thursday) and her
compooter is all bogged down. I told her I was busy, but I'd call.

Well, I'd plead Alzheimer's, but obviously I remember telling her that.
Maybe I'm too busy. In any case, I think she should take that thing back to
the young buck that "fixes" 'em and chargers her for his time (which I did
*not*).

Tell ya what, the old coots can and do learn.

Fool me once, shame on you.
Fool me twice, shame on me )



73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
(first licensed in 1962 and had 1st radiotelephone in 1966 along with a
commercial telegraph license - but don't know anything, obviously LOL)

ps - there is no respect for technically oriented folks in this country.
This is slowly being reflected by the drop folks opting for engineering
degrees. Everyone wants to be a lawyer or engineer.



"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... absolutely not, that is why ham radio has failed, the old guys keep
trying to turn it into a darn religion with a bunch of traditions (or is
that an A.A. meeting?)...
We need some young active technical people to bring some technology to
the focus in this hobby and breathe some life back into it...

Warmest regards,
John

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote in message
ups.com...
KC8GXW wrote:
But you still have to pay the VE fee, and have earned that
Tech in the first place. Not a giveaway or a free upgrade.

73 de Jim, N2EY

I was just being sarcastic because I have been told I have a
give away tech license!

Well, whoever told you that was full of beans and didn't know
what s/he was talking about. Probably just sour grapes.

73 de Jim, N2EY

I said that. And I mean it. The tests today are a joke. Why you
ask? Because the questions and answers are right there in front of the
person. Sure he has to study a lot of questions. But there they are
on the test. A give away.

And lets not even talk about the CW situation.

It's NOT numbers we need, it people that respect the traditions of
ham radio and want to continue them. Its people that love ham radio
and don't want to use to to order a pizza.

Call me old fashioned and out of touch. It won't be the first time.

Dan/W4NTI






  #4   Report Post  
Old June 7th 05, 02:24 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We have plenty of hi-tech stuff going on in Amateur Radio. Just not all
that much at HF or on the two meter CB band of FM machines.

Just off the top of my head.....ever hear of AMSAT? You know those
satellite thingy's?

Or how about digital voice on HF? Digital SlowScan? Or for that matter
digital fast scan TV? Then of course the utter glut of new and experimental
digital modes....too many to even talk about here. Then don't forget the
EME (moonbounce) with WSJT program that allows you to do what it took a KW
and 4 / 16 element phased yagis to do just a decade ago, with only 150
watts OR LESS?

So lets not talk about hams not doing anything technical.

Next BS line.

Dan/W4NTI

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
... absolutely not, that is why ham radio has failed, the old guys keep
trying to turn it into a darn religion with a bunch of traditions (or is
that an A.A. meeting?)...
We need some young active technical people to bring some technology to the
focus in this hobby and breathe some life back into it...

Warmest regards,
John

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
link.net...

wrote in message
ups.com...
KC8GXW wrote:
But you still have to pay the VE fee, and have earned that
Tech in the first place. Not a giveaway or a free upgrade.

73 de Jim, N2EY

I was just being sarcastic because I have been told I have a give
away tech license!

Well, whoever told you that was full of beans and didn't know
what s/he was talking about. Probably just sour grapes.

73 de Jim, N2EY

I said that. And I mean it. The tests today are a joke. Why you ask?
Because the questions and answers are right there in front of the person.
Sure he has to study a lot of questions. But there they are on the test.
A give away.

And lets not even talk about the CW situation.

It's NOT numbers we need, it people that respect the traditions of ham
radio and want to continue them. Its people that love ham radio and
don't want to use to to order a pizza.

Call me old fashioned and out of touch. It won't be the first time.

Dan/W4NTI






  #5   Report Post  
Old June 7th 05, 07:41 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hello, Dan

How about 85 watts on 24 GHz?

Naw, nothing technical going on in amateur radio.

Just plug the mic thingy in here and stick the antenna thingy in there.

)


73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA



"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
k.net...
We have plenty of hi-tech stuff going on in Amateur Radio. Just not all
that much at HF or on the two meter CB band of FM machines.

Just off the top of my head.....ever hear of AMSAT? You know those
satellite thingy's?

Or how about digital voice on HF? Digital SlowScan? Or for that matter
digital fast scan TV? Then of course the utter glut of new and

experimental
digital modes....too many to even talk about here. Then don't forget the
EME (moonbounce) with WSJT program that allows you to do what it took a KW
and 4 / 16 element phased yagis to do just a decade ago, with only 150
watts OR LESS?

So lets not talk about hams not doing anything technical.

Next BS line.

Dan/W4NTI





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 11:44 AM
Record Real Media Stream Rob Broadcasting 22 March 9th 04 09:09 PM
IN THE REAL WORLD ANTI GIRLS CAN DO NOTHING TO STOP THIS... Chim Bubba CB 4 December 2nd 03 08:45 PM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 30th 03 12:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017