Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim:
I think you can "know all the answers" to the exam, and yet be a total loss of how to apply it all, and how it all "really works"... Years ago when I was a teenager, it was at clubs and activities I picked up the "hands on", plus--even in the small town I lived in there were 3 hams! Now-a-days they are few and far between... And, now with everyone hiding from terrorists, afraid your neighbor is a child-molester, and too busy having to make a buck (wife too these days) the new comers miss a whole lot--in the city I live in, can walk-about all day long and not have one other citizen speak a greeting--if I don't speak first... things have changed, I am afraid it is "adapt-or-die" frown Warmest regards, John "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... "Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Dan/W4NTI wrote: wrote in message ups.com... KC8GXW wrote: But you still have to pay the VE fee, and have earned that Tech in the first place. Not a giveaway or a free upgrade. 73 de Jim, N2EY I was just being sarcastic because I have been told I have a give away tech license! ![]() Well, whoever told you that was full of beans and didn't know what s/he was talking about. Probably just sour grapes. 73 de Jim, N2EY I said that. And I mean it. The tests today are a joke. Why you ask? Because the questions and answers are right there in front of the person. Sure he has to study a lot of questions. But there they are on the test. A give away. And lets not even talk about the CW situation. It's NOT numbers we need, it people that respect the traditions of ham radio and want to continue them. Its people that love ham radio and don't want to use to to order a pizza. Call me old fashioned and out of touch. It won't be the first time. Dan/W4NTI Is there really any need for much technical knowledge to obtain a ham license anymore? Why a need for technical knowlege when setting up and operating a station today is simply plug-an-play? How many hams constuct any equipment they use on the air any more? The most tech knowledge that might be required is maybe how to build and put up and adjust an antenna. Perhaps the test should focus more on rules, regulations and proper operating procedures. The most technical that hams get today is knowing how many frequencies they can store in the radios memory. As you say Dan, with the joke they use for testing today, no technical knowledge is required anyway, just memorize the answers to the questions and off you go. So maybe if the tests were geared more to regs and operating procedures, then even with the memoriziation some of it might soak in and maybe there would less cb type operating on the ham bands. It is pretty bad when as I heard not long ago on a 2 meter reperter, "I just got my license, can someone tell me what frequencies I can operate?" Cheeese. Even wogie wussman passed the test, that in itself speaks volumns about how easy the they are. Hi, gang Well, I am at a loss to reply to one post. The gentleman asked about the necessity of needing an rf bridge to measure the impedance of his antenna. He asked if he could simply use an ohm meter. He is a general. I think. Maybe an extra ... ![]() My honest belief is that folks should understand reactance and resistance to obtain a general class license. We aren't talking brain surgery here. My concern is not over cw as it is really an old mode of transmission; however, that should not excuse folks from learning at least the basics of theory. I'm still contemplating a further post on a Hammond Organ site. One guy wants to replace an impedance transformer and a tube amp with a solid state amp. He seems concerned with "reflected power". My guess is that he is a newly minted general or extra class licensee. I did reply that I'd suggest only replacing the pre-amp and leave the impedance matching transformer. It will be easier. I just don't know how to explain about emitter followers or igfets (or mosfets, whatever). If he is licensed, it should be a no-brainer at audio frequencies (only to around 6 kHz at that!), but his concern about "reflected power" really leaves me brain-boggled. Of course, he might have several miles of feedline between the transformer and pre-amp, but I sort of doubt that. As to frequencies, anyone can transmit on any frequency. As to what frequencies the *may* legally operate on, that is another question - and one that individual should know. Or, at least have the reference materials around so he/she doesn't have to ask. It would be like going into an operating room for an operation and hearing the doctor ask "what is a scalpel?". Gaaaaaah! Which way to the exit? 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Record Real Media Stream | Broadcasting | |||
IN THE REAL WORLD ANTI GIRLS CAN DO NOTHING TO STOP THIS... | CB | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |