Mike Coslo wrote:
bb wrote:

Dee Flint wrote:

wrote in message
groups.com...

Mike Coslo wrote:

wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote:

[snip]


---

OK, here's one to toss around:

Right now we have 9 HF/MF bands, plus some spot frequencies in
the "60 meter" region.

Suppose that at some point we hams had the choice of either:

1) New, very narrow bands elsewhere in the HF/MF spectrum (say, 2.5 to
2.6 MHz, 6.0 to 6.1 MHz, etc..

or

2) Widening of existing bands and/or change to worldwide amateur. Such
as 7.0-7.4 becomes worldwide exclusive amateur, 10.1 to 10.2 does the
same, 14.0 to 14.4 (which the band used to be), etc.

Which would be preferable, if we wound up with the same number of kHz
overall?

73 de Jim, N2EY


I'd vote for the 2nd one. In my opinion, the bands we have now are nicely
space to take advantage of variations in propagation. However, I'd like a
lot more room on both 40 meters and 30 meters. If 30m could be widened,
then a phone section could be added.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


A PCTA wants more phone privs? FISTS rampage. Hiram groans.


It's all black or white Brian? A PCTA or NCTA has only one way to think
and one opinion on how things are?

- Mike KB3EIA -

Has the code exam been dropped yet? Might as well be all black or all
white because at the end of the day there are still people who support
the wall.