LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old June 12th 05, 05:41 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default



K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
wrote:


It seems very odd that I'd be accused of having a stranglehold
in a thread where all I did was post people's opinions about
when FCC would drop Element 1.


I've learned that people's opinions are now assertions of fact. As
assertions of fact, they are either right or wrong, truthful or
intentionally decitful (lies). At the end of the day, you either had a
right opinion, or you lied. You have Robeson to thank for that.


The problem, Brain, is that you don't learn when to express your
opinon AS an opinion, and when to express something as an assertion.


Let me put it another way:

When a statement reads as a fact, with no qualifiers like "I think" or
"IMHO" or such most people read it that the writer
is stating a fact.

A person can hold whatever opinions they like. That does not
mean all opinions are equally valid. A person's opinions can
be based on true facts and valid logic, or not. Doesn't make
the person a liar, just a poor thinker.

You STATED that "...the role of the ARES is overblown..",
yet the
very day you did it there were no less than three new items
on various
sites about third-party agencies lauding ARES volunteers.

You then also STATED that ARES will not be able to respond
because, allegedly, too many of the members are over extended on
commitments.

I've asked you over and over to provide some substantiation of
those comments, but you simply dodge the questions.

So either way you look at it, you're wrong. You are either so
blissfully ignorant of the enviroment you're in that it
manifests as
"stupid", or you're intentionally being deceitful,
in which case you're
the liar I have claimed you to be.


There's a third possibility, Steve:

That statement could simply be an opinion. The person starting
it has chosen not to back up that opinion with facts. Doesn't
make them a liar. It does show that they can't back up their
opinion with facts, that's all.

73 de Jim, N2EY



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' Mike Coslo Policy 24 July 22nd 04 05:50 AM
The Pool N2EY Policy 515 February 22nd 04 03:14 AM
From the Extra question pool: The dipole David Robbins General 1 January 23rd 04 05:32 PM
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep Equipment 0 November 27th 03 07:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017