Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.

I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

I think enough folks have
written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom
have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not
follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from
their licensing process.

A-yup.

73

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.

I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

Ayup. Sounds reasonbable to me.

K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.

I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

I'd vote for all of it myself. Problem is though that crystal-balling
what the FCC actually comes up with is like playing Russian roulette
with three rounds in the cylinder. Maybe four rounds . . . Like Shultz
would say "I doan bet on NOTTING!". In this game. Which is why I
haven't. And won't.

I think enough folks have
written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom
have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not
follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from
their licensing process.

A-yup.

73

Steve, K4YZ

w3rv

ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.

I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

I think enough folks have
written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom
have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not
follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from
their licensing process.

OTH I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

A-yup.

73

Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Steve, K4YZ

Usenet Nazi

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

Steve, K4YZ

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.

You've not done that yet.

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?

And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.

You seem to not do that.

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.

It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


You've not done that yet.

Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?

Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek.


And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!

becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.

I am gald you stoped the false coutesy

You seem to not do that.

No I don't. What was your first clue?

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.

and I am thanking you for it


Steve, K4YZ

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...


K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on
on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top
post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.

It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


You've not done that yet.

Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the
FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?

Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek.


And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!

becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.

I am gald you stoped the false coutesy

You seem to not do that.

No I don't. What was your first clue?

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from
your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.

and I am thanking you for it


Steve, K4YZ


Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.

It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm

I always get a laugh from people like you who HIDE behind the
American's with Disabilities Act calling others "lazy".

You've not done that yet.

Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.

I doubt you have a car of any signifigance to carry any freight
in, Markie.

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?

Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek

You keep trying to impose arbitrary religious content here,
Markie. Why?

And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!

becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely

I used to.

Then you started following Lennie's lead with "Stevie" and calling
me a "lier" when the facts are clear that YOU are the one who's wrong.

Stop lying and start calling me "Steve" and I will reciprocate by
calling you "Mark".

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.

I am gald you stoped the false coutesy

What? Huh? Stoped? What's a "false coutesy"...???

You meant "false courtesy"...?!?! If I said it, it wasn't false.

You seem to not do that.

No I don't. What was your first clue?

Anything you write south of "KONSTANS". Pretty much a sure bet
that there's falshoods or other misrepresentations to follow from there
on down...

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?

What in the world is a "morse deserved term"...?!?!

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.

and I am thanking you for it

Only you, Morgan!....Only you...

BBBWWWWHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
! ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ