Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Perhaps what bothers some people the most about the code test is that it isn't something most people already know. And it isn't something that can be learned by reading a book, watching a video, etc. It's a skill, not "book learning". That makes it a real PITA to people who are good at book learnin' and not so hot at motor skills. In learning the code, a Ph.D in EE has to start at the same place as a grade-schooler. And the grade schooler may learn faster and do better! Perhaps it is this characteristic of the test - its ability to act as a Great Equalizer - that causes some to resent it so much. That makes ham radio that much harder to "sell" to the PhDs and such people. Code is something that can be outperformed by various signaling and signal processing methods (JPL doesn't use Morse code to communicate with their deep space probes). Sure, Morse code requires a bare minimum of technology, but today technology is cheap and reliable. Not like 50 years ago with vacuum tubes. No other radio service uses Morse code for anything beyond some automatic IDers. So why require it anymore. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
Navy launches second Kerry medal probe | Shortwave | |||
U.S. Navy IG Says Kerry's Medals Proper | Shortwave | |||
Navy Radiomen | General | |||
Base Closures | Shortwave |