Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kelly:
Yep. Personal attacks, don't discuss what is not in your personal self-interests. Call those with differing ideas a troll, deny a problem exists, etc, etc, etc... Gee, where have I seen this behavior before... John wrote in message oups.com... Mike Coslo wrote: Dee Flint wrote: "John Smith" wrote in message ... ... oh, I love that argument!!! Let me see if I have it correctly, either: 1) Women are too stupid for the technical fields. Uh-Huh. You trump all of 'em in that game. How you managed to twist Mike's words to come up with this interpretation is amazing. He neither said nor implied anything of the sort. 2) We are no worse than any other technical field about baring women. He said nothing about barring women from technical fields. Again how you managed to come up with this inverted interpretation is one of the mysteries of the world. Women choose not to go into technical fields for their own reasons. That includes hobby activities like ham radio. He's another Burke Dee, a male ditz/troll, he isn't worth the effort, ignore the goofball. Thank you. I work with a number of female engineers, and they seem to have no problem working with me. My opinion on the issue is based on conversations with them. I smell an oddity here. Dee is an engineer who apparently works in academia. You also work in academia and know some number of woman engineers who are also in academia. I've been out here in the commercial side for decades and per previous have had very few encounters with woman engineers. Is it possible that the woman engineers I don't see out here are operating in academia instead?? Would not surprise me a bit if that's the case. Especially one who bristles at being called a "female" engineer. She says "Just call me an engineer, if you don't mind!" Oh crap . . been there, done that . . my middle daughter was an over-the-edge NOW street warrior in her college days back when the battle over abortions rights was in full bloom. I can't tell you how much I enjoyed watching her in action on the six PM news. TWICE. Of course she had "problems" with this male chauvinist pig. Finally got down to me suggesting that instead of differentiating by the man/woman thing we differtiate by using "X-Chromosone people" and "Y-Chromosone people" instead. Only got me about ten seconds of peace before she recovered and got all over me again. sigh - Mike KB3EIA - w3rv |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Smith wrote: Kelly: Yep. Personal attacks, don't discuss what is not in your personal self-interests. Call those with differing ideas a troll, deny a problem exists, etc, etc, etc... Gee, where have I seen this behavior before... John (yawn) Zzzzzz . . . |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
Navy launches second Kerry medal probe | Shortwave | |||
U.S. Navy IG Says Kerry's Medals Proper | Shortwave | |||
Navy Radiomen | General | |||
Base Closures | Shortwave |