| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
June 18th 05, 07:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#2
June 19th 05, 12:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Leo wrote:
On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 Dave Heil wrote: wrote: snip Seig Heil!!! :-) Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr. Godwin's rule. Yeah, those jerks always invoke Godwin when someone is compared to the Nazi's. 8^) I mean like, he was just sayin'! - Mike KB3EIA - |
|
#3
June 19th 05, 12:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 19:33:20 -0400, Mike Coslo
wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 Dave Heil wrote: wrote: snip Seig Heil!!! :-) Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr. Godwin's rule. Yeah, those jerks always invoke Godwin when someone is compared to the Nazi's. 8^) That's right - every time! Does absolutely no good, but it just has to be done, I suppose..... I think the comparison in question was to the bumbling TV 'Nazis' on "Hogan's Heroes", not the 'real' ones - but hey, Godwin must be appeased... And as usual, the OC was right there as predicted!  - Mike KB3EIA - 73, Leo |
|
#4
June 19th 05, 01:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Leo wrote:
On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 Dave Heil wrote: wrote: snip Seig Heil!!! :-) Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr. Godwin's rule. "attempt"? Hardly! Len used the following phrases in reference to K8MN: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 "Kolonel Klunk" "Klunk's way of thinking" "the lighted one always carried by Klunk "That's better than the megacubic feet of Hot Air vented by this "patriot" who behaves like a miscast stereotype of a Kommandant in a half-hour TV sitcom about POWs during WW2." "Seig Heil!!! :-)" If that isn't a clear Godwin example, nothing is. Or do you think the one smiley makes all of Len's verbiage somehow acceptable behavior? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
|
#6
June 19th 05, 12:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 17:30:57 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 Dave Heil wrote: wrote: snip Seig Heil!!! :-) Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr. Godwin's rule. "attempt"? Hardly! snip Attempt, definitely. Because, as has been demonstrated many times before, the discusion will continue regardless of whether Godwin's impotent rule has been 'invoked' or not. The version of Godwin's rule that I use says that the person who uses stoops to calling their opponent "Hitler", "Nazis" or references to them, has lost the argument. That the discussion continues is irrelevant. Len has lost the argument. But it just had to be done, didn't it? No, it didn't. But I did it anyway. Is there a problem with that? Do you think Len's slurs are acceptable behavior? |
|
#7
June 19th 05, 01:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 19 Jun 2005 04:48:01 -0700, wrote:
Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 17:30:57 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 Dave Heil wrote: wrote: snip Seig Heil!!! :-) Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr. Godwin's rule. "attempt"? Hardly! snip Attempt, definitely. Because, as has been demonstrated many times before, the discusion will continue regardless of whether Godwin's impotent rule has been 'invoked' or not. The version of Godwin's rule that I use says that the person who uses stoops to calling their opponent "Hitler", "Nazis" or references to them, has lost the argument. That the discussion continues is irrelevant. Len has lost the argument. I see. Thanks for clearing that up, Jim - for a minute there, I was afraid that you hadn't accomplished anything useful there! But it just had to be done, didn't it? No, it didn't. But I did it anyway. Of course you did. You had to! Is there a problem with that? Do you think Len's slurs are acceptable behavior? There are several folks here whose 'slurs' and language are much worse than this example (a reference to the bumbling and comical 'Nazis' on "Hogan's Heroes") - always has been, always will be. It's not my job to run around and point that out all day every day. It's not my job to point that out to each and every participant on this group Jim - is it yours? Why? (73 de Jim etc. sig missing again) 73, Leo |
|
#8
June 19th 05, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Leo wrote:
On 19 Jun 2005 04:48:01 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 17:30:57 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 Dave Heil wrote: wrote: snip Seig Heil!!! :-) Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr. Godwin's rule. "attempt"? Hardly! snip Attempt, definitely. Because, as has been demonstrated many times before, the discusion will continue regardless of whether Godwin's impotent rule has been 'invoked' or not. The version of Godwin's rule that I use says that the person who uses stoops to calling their opponent "Hitler", "Nazis" or references to them, has lost the argument. That the discussion continues is irrelevant. Len has lost the argument. I see. Thanks for clearing that up, Jim - for a minute there, I was afraid that you hadn't accomplished anything useful there! So it wasn't an "attempt" but a success. But it just had to be done, didn't it? No, it didn't. But I did it anyway. Of course you did. You had to! Nope. I chose to. Is there a problem with that? Do you think Len's slurs are acceptable behavior? There are several folks here whose 'slurs' and language are much worse than this example Yes, Len has done worse.... (a reference to the bumbling and comical 'Nazis' on "Hogan's Heroes") The Fuhrer was a feldwebel in WW1 - always has been, always will be. That claim is incorrect. Usenet is not eternal. It's not my job to run around and point that out all day every day. You have avoided the question. Do you think Len's slurs are acceptable behavior? It's not my job to point that out to each and every participant on this group Jim - is it yours? Why? Your argument seems to be that since Len will probably exhibit his typical immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior anyway, there's no point in pointing out when he is, indeed, exhibiting his typical immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior. Is that about right? Perhaps you have a valid point, since if what Len seeks is attention, pointing out his typical immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior gives him that attention. (73 de Jim etc. sig missing again) Not missing - omitted. The original meaning of "73" is "a friendly greeting between operators". In the context of amateur radio, this means between amateur radio operators. It would be inappropriate to use the greeting to someone who is not an amateur radio operator. 73, Leo |
|
#9
June 19th 05, 04:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 19 Jun 2005 07:19:22 -0700, wrote:
Leo wrote: On 19 Jun 2005 04:48:01 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 17:30:57 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 18 Jun 2005 10:41:47 -0700, wrote: From: Mike Coslo on Fri 17 Jun 2005 22:07 Dave Heil wrote: wrote: snip Seig Heil!!! :-) Next up, Jim will once again attempt to invoke Mr. Godwin's rule. "attempt"? Hardly! snip Attempt, definitely. Because, as has been demonstrated many times before, the discusion will continue regardless of whether Godwin's impotent rule has been 'invoked' or not. The version of Godwin's rule that I use says that the person who uses stoops to calling their opponent "Hitler", "Nazis" or references to them, has lost the argument. That the discussion continues is irrelevant. Len has lost the argument. I see. Thanks for clearing that up, Jim - for a minute there, I was afraid that you hadn't accomplished anything useful there! So it wasn't an "attempt" but a success. Was it? Not really - the discussion will continue. But it just had to be done, didn't it? No, it didn't. But I did it anyway. Of course you did. You had to! Nope. I chose to. The choice, Sir, was not yours to make - you simply could not resist doing so. Is there a problem with that? Do you think Len's slurs are acceptable behavior? There are several folks here whose 'slurs' and language are much worse than this example Yes, Len has done worse.... Is that what I said? Don't think so! (a reference to the bumbling and comical 'Nazis' on "Hogan's Heroes") The Fuhrer was a feldwebel in WW1 Godwin invoked. - always has been, always will be. That claim is incorrect. Usenet is not eternal. It's not my job to run around and point that out all day every day. You have avoided the question. Do you think Len's slurs are acceptable behavior? Not my job to judge that, Jim. That's apparently your role. It's not my job to point that out to each and every participant on this group Jim - is it yours? Why? Your argument seems to be that since Len will probably exhibit his typical immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior anyway, there's no point in pointing out when he is, indeed, exhibiting his typical immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior. Is that about right? Nope. You have avoided the question. Perhaps you have a valid point, since if what Len seeks is attention, pointing out his typical immature ethnic-slur Godwin-violating bad-pun Unknown-Soldier-insulting jackass behavior gives him that attention. (73 de Jim etc. sig missing again) Not missing - omitted. In a fit of pique? As an insult? Forgot, maybe! Lid-like behaviour, wouldn't you think? The original meaning of "73" is "a friendly greeting between operators". In the context of amateur radio, this means between amateur radio operators. In the words of Hans - thank you, Captain Obvious! It would be inappropriate to use the greeting to someone who is not an amateur radio operator. Which I am. And have stated many times before. Poor memory? Google 'er up..... 73, Leo (73 de Jim omitted apparently intentionally - boo hoo )73, Leo. |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
| Navy launches second Kerry medal probe | Shortwave | |||
| U.S. Navy IG Says Kerry's Medals Proper | Shortwave | |||
| Navy Radiomen | General | |||
| Base Closures | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
