| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
And You Wonder Why I Consider KB9RQZ An Idiot...?!?!
an_old_friend wrote:
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much for you Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite precisely= .. As a licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand? All of it. tht sort of usage is not in vogue, nor is it in english. "...not in vogue..." BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH= AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA= HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... BBBWWWWWHHWHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH= AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA= HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! Steve, K4YZ |
First none wonders why you consider me an idiot
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much for you Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite precise= ly. As a licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand? All of it. tht sort of usage is not in vogue, nor is it in english. "...not in vogue..." all true crying cut for formating improvements And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... indeed and you have a problem with that, and need to start another of your personal attack threads crying cut for formating improvements ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! which even if true (and franky you have a real sample problem) has nothing to do with the statement "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! thinking somebody snide makes one an idiot, well then Hoist you idiot =20 Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! Steve, K4YZ Not really, Steve. We just wonder why you pay any attention in the first place, then find it necessary to comment? I'm sure that in your sick mind, you can justify it somehow. Best of luck getting back to normal. |
an_old_friend wrote: First none wonders why you consider me an idiot You finally got one thing right this week... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much for you Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite preci= sely. As a licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand? All of it. tht sort of usage is not in vogue, nor is it in english. "...not in vogue..." all true Yes, it's true that you don't understand emission designators...Yet it's supposed to be a part of your licensing scope. crying cut for formating improvements You cut yourself out? Why? And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... indeed and you have a problem with that, and need to start another of your personal attack threads It's not a personal attack, Mark. It's a professional observation. You have a problem with English. You're not very proficient at it. crying cut for formating improvements Snipped more embarrassing stuff, you mean... 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! which even if true (and franky you have a real sample problem) has nothing to do with the statement No...not "...even if true..." It's absolutely true. "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! thinking somebody snide makes one an idiot No...YOU calling Hans "snide" for having the temerity to actually think he was doing you a favor by answering your question for you in an accurate and prompt manner makes you an idiot. well then Hoist you idiot Huh...?!?! "Hoist you"...?!?! Some gay pagan salute? Steve, K4YZ |
b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! Steve, K4YZ Not really, Steve. We just wonder why you pay any attention in the first place, then find it necessary to comment? I'm sure that in your sick mind, you can justify it somehow. Best of luck getting back to normal. Feeling left out, Brain..?!?! Suddenly realize you're not the ONLY chronic liar and newsgroup ner'-do-well requiring attention? Why don't you and Lennie keep each other back-channel-happy for a while...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: First none wonders why you consider me an idiot You finally got one thing right this week... Mighty white of you old man K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much for you Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite pre= cisely. As a licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand? All of it. tht sort of usage is not in vogue, nor is it in english. "...not in vogue..." all true Yes, it's true that you don't understand emission designators...Yet it's supposed to be a part of your licensing scope. not a question about alph numeric mode codes in my question pool The only even mention was mode A1A Morse encoded CW, and that was only as an aside in Gordon book that I used to prepare for it and No suchare even mention in the current Tech pool If you think it should you shouldaddress your coments to the NVEC crying cut for formating improvements You cut yourself out? Why? nop cut out your crying And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... indeed and you have a problem with that, and need to start another of your personal attack threads It's not a personal attack, Mark. It's a professional observation. Nope a BIG lie for an ER nurse, not your feild You have a problem with English. You're not very proficient at it. but your coment that I am more proficent in Sebian is a lie crying cut for formating improvements Snipped more embarrassing stuff, you mean... Nope just one of your crying 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! which even if true (and franky you have a real sample problem) has nothing to do with the statement No...not "...even if true..." yes even if true You are the close to most narrowminded idoit haolding a Ham license. Yo Doc was the worst I know of It's absolutely true. nope "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! thinking somebody snide makes one an idiot No...YOU calling Hans "snide" for having the temerity to actually think he was doing you a favor by answering your question for you in an accurate and prompt manner makes you an idiot. Well he amswered some OTHER question not mine and not one tht had been asked well then Hoist you idiot Huh...?!?! "Hoist you"...?!?! yes aren't well enough educated Some gay pagan salute? Nope and more of your gaybashing more of your pagan bashing =20 Steve, K4YZ |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... First none wonders why you consider me an idiot Ever lived in Canada? |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: First none wonders why you consider me an idiot You finally got one thing right this week... Mighty white of you old man K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much for you Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite precisely. As a licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand? All of it. tht sort of usage is not in vogue, nor is it in english. "...not in vogue..." all true Yes, it's true that you don't understand emission designators...Yet it's supposed to be a part of your licensing scope. not a question about alph numeric mode codes in my question pool The only even mention was mode A1A Morse encoded CW, and that was only as an aside in Gordon book that I used to prepare for it and No suchare even mention in the current Tech pool If you think it should you shouldaddress your coments to the NVEC crying cut for formating improvements You cut yourself out? Why? nop cut out your crying And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... indeed and you have a problem with that, and need to start another of your personal attack threads It's not a personal attack, Mark. It's a professional observation. Nope a BIG lie for an ER nurse, not your feild You have a problem with English. You're not very proficient at it. but your coment that I am more proficent in Sebian is a lie crying cut for formating improvements Snipped more embarrassing stuff, you mean... Nope just one of your crying 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! which even if true (and franky you have a real sample problem) has nothing to do with the statement No...not "...even if true..." yes even if true You are the close to most narrowminded idoit haolding a Ham license. Yo Doc was the worst I know of It's absolutely true. nope "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! thinking somebody snide makes one an idiot No...YOU calling Hans "snide" for having the temerity to actually think he was doing you a favor by answering your question for you in an accurate and prompt manner makes you an idiot. Well he amswered some OTHER question not mine and not one tht had been asked well then Hoist you idiot Huh...?!?! "Hoist you"...?!?! yes aren't well enough educated Some gay pagan salute? Nope and more of your gaybashing more of your pagan bashing Steve, K4YZ I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. "2K8J3E" is broken down into two parts. 2K8 and J3E. Years ago, A1 was CW. F3 was FM. A3 was AM. Well, they clarified the emission types to indicate whether a signal was single sideband, double sideband, independent sidebands and whether the carrier was suppressed, reduced, or full carrier. J3E refers to the emission type. I have a strong suspicion that 2K8 represents a 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth. We often refer to single sideband, fm, cw, or whatever. The nomenclature that Steve put forth is a formal one that pins down the emission type and bandwidth much more clearly than saying something like "FM". FM, as you might be aware, comes in a number of flavors. Narrowband FM has become even narrower in recent years; however, commercial broadcasting FM is much wider (and often has a subcarrier present too. They have stereo as well as secondary transmissions (perhaps Muzak) as well). So Steve may have been a little strong in his wording, but his conclusion was not in error. You appear to have little knowledge of emission types/bandwidth occupancy. Not slamming you, but Steve was not entirely remiss in his post. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
That I lack a knowledge of the arcane ways in which mode were described is NOT disputed by me Jim Hampton wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... hack Yes, it's true that you don't understand emission designators...Yet it's supposed to be a part of your licensing scope. not a question about alph numeric mode codes in my question pool The only even mention was mode A1A Morse encoded CW, and that was only as an aside in Gordon book that I used to prepare for it and No suchare even mention in the current Tech pool If you think it should you shouldaddress your coments to the NVEC hack Well he amswered some OTHER question not mine and not one tht had been asked well then Hoist you idiot Huh...?!?! "Hoist you"...?!?! yes aren't well enough educated Some gay pagan salute? Nope and more of your gaybashing more of your pagan bashing Steve, K4YZ I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. "2K8J3E" is broken down into two parts. 2K8 and J3E. Years ago, A1 was CW. F3 was FM. A3 was AM. Well, they clarified the emission types to indicate whether a signal was single sideband, double sideband, independent sidebands and whether the carrier was suppressed, reduced, or full carrier. I have seen fragment of this but in my reading of way part 97 recently I don't recall it J3E refers to the emission type. I have a strong suspicion that 2K8 represents a 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth. you may well be right but even you don't know, not a slame on you but pointing that you clearly know better than are not sure how can I be expected to know it We often refer to single sideband, fm, cw, or whatever. The nomenclature that Steve put forth is a formal one that pins down the emission type and Corecting you Hans put it forth, Steve is taking me to task for not knowing it bandwidth much more clearly than saying something like "FM". FM, as you might be aware, comes in a number of flavors. Narrowband FM has become even frankly wasn't realy aware if you mean it it has defined subset like FM 2 khz wide (realy narrow if it can even get that narrow) FM 30MHz wide (which is used in some gunnplexer mircowave gear) narrower in recent years; however, commercial broadcasting FM is much wider (and often has a subcarrier present too. They have stereo as well as secondary transmissions (perhaps Muzak) as well). secondary trans I think i know about a modualted signal carried like the pl tone we use on repeaters So Steve may have been a little strong in his wording, but his conclusion was not in error. You appear to have little knowledge of emission types/bandwidth occupancy. Agreed and Steve and for that Hans know this and choose to give an answer technical correct (is it in fact technicaly correct) but dsigned to be useless to me Not slamming you, but Steve was not entirely remiss in his post. I accept thatyou intend no slam but I miss you have missed Stevies intent 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA So how long have you been a K0HB sycophant? |
"Han's Buddy" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA So how long have you been a K0HB sycophant? I am hardly a "toady". You may not be aware, but I served in the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam war. There had been a typhoon on Saipan that wiped out the Coast Guard tower there. Hans was sent to try and re-establish communications with Guam. I was the individual on Guam who made the initial contact and the amateurs relayed traffic for a number of days between Saipan and ComNavMar. Hans was on the Saipan end, where most everything had been leveled. I respect Hans simply because he has *earned* it. Is that such a difficult concept? Hans did more for his country in a week than most do in a lifetime. Frankly, I couldn't care less about the folks that want to dismiss Hans; as I stated, he served, served well, and served proudly. I have no problem with that. I suspect you'll be one of the folks in the years to come that will condemn the guys and gals serving in Iraq and Afghanistan today. You'll be another one voting to cut VA services. Thank you so much. Where did you serve? Or did you serve like our current Commandant-In-Chief? With all due regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
"LittleGreenAlien" wrote in message news:rhijva8nvzh3mk0.050720051629@kirk... YAWN i seen that movie arnold swartzenegger played the part better ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz LGA Which movie was it John Smith.....er LGA? "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... "Han's Buddy" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA So how long have you been a K0HB sycophant? I am hardly a "toady". You may not be aware, but I served in the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam war. There had been a typhoon on Saipan that wiped out the Coast Guard tower there. Hans was sent to try and re-establish communications with Guam. I was the individual on Guam who made the initial contact and the amateurs relayed traffic for a number of days between Saipan and ComNavMar. Hans was on the Saipan end, where most everything had been leveled. I respect Hans simply because he has *earned* it. Is that such a difficult concept? Hans did more for his country in a week than most do in a lifetime. Frankly, I couldn't care less about the folks that want to dismiss Hans; as I stated, he served, served well, and served proudly. I have no problem with that. I suspect you'll be one of the folks in the years to come that will condemn the guys and gals serving in Iraq and Afghanistan today. You'll be another one voting to cut VA services. Thank you so much. Where did you serve? Or did you serve like our current Commandant-In-Chief? With all due regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
The one where arnold played me, the real John Smith.
You remember, you were my double there! ROFLOL John "John Smith" wrote in message news:1120609804.3754379e2eec9980738c8772db8980c5@t eranews... "LittleGreenAlien" wrote in message news:rhijva8nvzh3mk0.050720051629@kirk... YAWN i seen that movie arnold swartzenegger played the part better ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz LGA Which movie was it John Smith.....er LGA? "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... "Han's Buddy" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA So how long have you been a K0HB sycophant? I am hardly a "toady". You may not be aware, but I served in the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam war. There had been a typhoon on Saipan that wiped out the Coast Guard tower there. Hans was sent to try and re-establish communications with Guam. I was the individual on Guam who made the initial contact and the amateurs relayed traffic for a number of days between Saipan and ComNavMar. Hans was on the Saipan end, where most everything had been leveled. I respect Hans simply because he has *earned* it. Is that such a difficult concept? Hans did more for his country in a week than most do in a lifetime. Frankly, I couldn't care less about the folks that want to dismiss Hans; as I stated, he served, served well, and served proudly. I have no problem with that. I suspect you'll be one of the folks in the years to come that will condemn the guys and gals serving in Iraq and Afghanistan today. You'll be another one voting to cut VA services. Thank you so much. Where did you serve? Or did you serve like our current Commandant-In-Chief? With all due regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Uh, huh, I won't... lol
John "Arnold Schwarzenegger" wrote in message news:bt28llagfd2pkie.050720051754@kirk... JAH! me the arnie baby was the star don't forget it arnold "John Smith" wrote in message ... The one where arnold played me, the real John Smith. You remember, you were my double there! ROFLOL John "John Smith" wrote in message news:1120609804.3754379e2eec9980738c8772db8980c5@t eranews... "LittleGreenAlien" wrote in message news:rhijva8nvzh3mk0.050720051629@kirk... YAWN i seen that movie arnold swartzenegger played the part better ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz LGA Which movie was it John Smith.....er LGA? "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... "Han's Buddy" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA So how long have you been a K0HB sycophant? I am hardly a "toady". You may not be aware, but I served in the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam war. There had been a typhoon on Saipan that wiped out the Coast Guard tower there. Hans was sent to try and re-establish communications with Guam. I was the individual on Guam who made the initial contact and the amateurs relayed traffic for a number of days between Saipan and ComNavMar. Hans was on the Saipan end, where most everything had been leveled. I respect Hans simply because he has *earned* it. Is that such a difficult concept? Hans did more for his country in a week than most do in a lifetime. Frankly, I couldn't care less about the folks that want to dismiss Hans; as I stated, he served, served well, and served proudly. I have no problem with that. I suspect you'll be one of the folks in the years to come that will condemn the guys and gals serving in Iraq and Afghanistan today. You'll be another one voting to cut VA services. Thank you so much. Where did you serve? Or did you serve like our current Commandant-In-Chief? With all due regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Yep,
And I know why I wish I was back in the country my grandfather was born in. You folks are off the top. With all due regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - my grandfather was born in Scotland. "LittleGreenAlien" wrote in message news:rhijva8nvzh3mk0.050720051629@kirk... YAWN i seen that movie arnold swartzenegger played the part better ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz LGA |
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I am hardly a "toady". ////////remaining drivel flushed////// OH I see now. You are not only a K0HB sycophant, but you also repeat the often debunked and infamous "Hans Radio Hero" story. OK, you can go back to hitting the shot 'n beers down at the Legion Hall. |
There's a sequel coming out soon. They are filming it down at
the Legion Hall. The title of the remake movie is going to be: "Hans And His Sycophants Tell Radio Hero 2" The new story line will involve how Hans personally changed the course of a Typhoon, so that radio traffic could get through to the fleet. "LittleGreenAlien" wrote in message news:rhijva8nvzh3mk0.050720051629@kirk... YAWN i seen that movie arnold swartzenegger played the part better ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz LGA "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... "Han's Buddy" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA So how long have you been a K0HB sycophant? I am hardly a "toady". You may not be aware, but I served in the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam war. There had been a typhoon on Saipan that wiped out the Coast Guard tower there. Hans was sent to try and re-establish communications with Guam. I was the individual on Guam who made the initial contact and the amateurs relayed traffic for a number of days between Saipan and ComNavMar. Hans was on the Saipan end, where most everything had been leveled. I respect Hans simply because he has *earned* it. Is that such a difficult concept? Hans did more for his country in a week than most do in a lifetime. Frankly, I couldn't care less about the folks that want to dismiss Hans; as I stated, he served, served well, and served proudly. I have no problem with that. I suspect you'll be one of the folks in the years to come that will condemn the guys and gals serving in Iraq and Afghanistan today. You'll be another one voting to cut VA services. Thank you so much. Where did you serve? Or did you serve like our current Commandant-In-Chief? With all due regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
BWAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... Yep, And I know why I wish I was back in the country my grandfather was born in. You folks are off the top. With all due regards from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA ps - my grandfather was born in Scotland. "LittleGreenAlien" wrote in message news:rhijva8nvzh3mk0.050720051629@kirk... YAWN i seen that movie arnold swartzenegger played the part better ZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzz LGA |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: First none wonders why you consider me an idiot You finally got one thing right this week... Mighty white of you old man Now THAT'S bigotry, Mark. Yes, it's true that you don't understand emission designators...Yet it's supposed to be a part of your licensing scope. not a question about alph numeric mode codes in my question pool I didn't say it was a licensing question, Mark. I said it's within the scope of your licensure. If you think it should you shouldaddress your coments to the NVEC Why should I address the fact that Mark Morgan is ignorant of the rules and regulations that he is responsible for knowing and complying with to the NVEC? crying cut for formating improvements You cut yourself out? Why? nop cut out your crying Huh? And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... indeed and you have a problem with that, and need to start another of your personal attack threads It's not a personal attack, Mark. It's a professional observation. Nope a BIG lie for an ER nurse, not your feild Nope. Being able to assess the basic level of social development and competency with "ADL'S", or "Activites of Daily Living", is a number-one criterion for a good ER Nurse. Now...Would YOU please show me where YOU have any credentials in determining what is and is not within the scope of practice for a Nurse at ANY level of licensure...?!?! You have a problem with English. You're not very proficient at it. but your coment that I am more proficent in Sebian is a lie I never said you were competent in Sebian...Whatever THAT is... crying cut for formating improvements Snipped more embarrassing stuff, you mean... Nope just one of your crying I'm not the one crying, Markie. I'm not the one having his dirty laundry and failed character held up to the light of day. 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! which even if true (and franky you have a real sample problem) has nothing to do with the statement No...not "...even if true..." yes even if true Then it's true and we've found something else we can agree on. You're idiotic and narrow brained. Good show. You are the close to most narrowminded idoit haolding a Ham license. Just when I think I can't laugh any harder, Mark pushes the button one more time! BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! Yo Doc was the worst I know of You mean he was more aggressive in rubbing your nose in your own droppings. I can live with that. It's absolutely true. nope Yep. "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! thinking somebody snide makes one an idiot No...YOU calling Hans "snide" for having the temerity to actually think he was doing you a favor by answering your question for you in an accurate and prompt manner makes you an idiot. Well he amswered some OTHER question not mine and not one tht had been asked You asked about the "60 meter band" and about what mode could be used there. He answered you precisely. You responded in your typical idiotic, kneejerk fashion, once again showing the world what kind of "man" Mark Morgan is. well then Hoist you idiot Huh...?!?! "Hoist you"...?!?! yes aren't well enough educated "Hoist you"...?!?! "yes aren't well enough educated"...?!?! Mark, there's not one coherent thought there...Not to the rest of the world, anyway. Some gay pagan salute? Nope and more of your gaybashing more of your pagan bashing What gaybashing? What pagan bashing? Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... hack Yes, Mark...that's what you do best... That I lack a knowledge of the arcane ways in which mode were described is NOT disputed by me It's not arcane. It's "here and now". It's codified into the regulations for a federal license that YOU hold and are required to at least be familiar with. I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. "2K8J3E" is broken down into two parts. 2K8 and J3E. Years ago, A1 was CW. F3 was FM. A3 was AM. Well, they clarified the emission types to indicate whether a signal was single sideband, double sideband, independent sidebands and whether the carrier was suppressed, reduced, or full carrier. I have seen fragment of this but in my reading of way part 97 recently I don't recall it Becasue you skipped over the parts not written in crayon, Mark. J3E refers to the emission type. I have a strong suspicion that 2K8 represents a 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth. you may well be right but even you don't know, not a slame on you but pointing that you clearly know better than are not sure how can I be expected to know it You can be expected to at least know where to find the information since you ARE responsible for it as a Commisssion licensee of an Amateur Radio station. I don't know them all either, but I know where to find out. We often refer to single sideband, fm, cw, or whatever. The nomenclature that Steve put forth is a formal one that pins down the emission type and Corecting you Hans put it forth, Steve is taking me to task for not knowing it No, not at all. I am taking you to task for treating Hans so rudely then lying about it afterwards. So Steve may have been a little strong in his wording, but his conclusion was not in error. You appear to have little knowledge of emission types/bandwidth occupancy. Agreed and Steve and for that Hans know this and choose to give an answer technical correct (is it in fact technicaly correct) but dsigned to be useless to me It was only useless to you since you refused to follow-up on it from there. You wanted spoon-fed, written in crayon answers. Hans' only mistake was assuming that you might be albe to understand the answer. Not slamming you, but Steve was not entirely remiss in his post. I accept thatyou intend no slam but I miss you have missed Stevies intent There's no "intent" on my part, Mark. You asked a question. You got the answer. You then insulted the respondant and called him a liar. You were wrong on several levels. You owe Hans Brakob an apology. Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: First none wonders why you consider me an idiot You finally got one thing right this week... Mighty white of you old man Now THAT'S bigotry, Mark. Perhaps it is also sarcasm Yes, it's true that you don't understand emission designators...Yet it's supposed to be a part of your licensing scope. not a question about alph numeric mode codes in my question pool I didn't say it was a licensing question, Mark. I said it's within the scope of your licensure. auf anglish bitte If you think it should you shouldaddress your coments to the NVEC Why should I address the fact that Mark Morgan is ignorant of the rules and regulations that he is responsible for knowing and complying with to the NVEC? you should not, but given your control freak mentality you may well have done so already, OTOH it is what I said. what I said is that if you think knowing such codes is so important you address your concenr to NVEC There is no requirement that I know any rule or regulation Stevie, merely that I obey them. I freely admit I don't or care about the meaning of j87fh76k or the differences between it and j6gd748jd crying cut for formating improvements You cut yourself out? Why? nop cut out your crying Huh? grow up And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... indeed and you have a problem with that, and need to start another of your personal attack threads It's not a personal attack, Mark. It's a professional observation. Nope a BIG lie for an ER nurse, not your feild Nope. Yep Being able to assess the basic level of social development and competency with "ADL'S", or "Activites of Daily Living", is a number-one criterion for a good ER Nurse. if so then why are you so bad at it oH excuse you said Good ER nurse that does let you out Now...Would YOU please show me where YOU have any credentials in determining what is and is not within the scope of practice for a Nurse at ANY level of licensure...?!?! NO I will not There are limits to the extent I will help you play your divisionary games You have a problem with English. You're not very proficient at it. but your coment that I am more proficent in Sebian is a lie I never said you were competent in Sebian...Whatever THAT is... more avoidance crying cut for formating improvements Snipped more embarrassing stuff, you mean... Nope just one of your crying I'm not the one crying, Markie. yes are the one crying your are the word typing crap like bbbbbbbbbbahhhhhhhhhhhh Iam just cuting it out of my replies grow up I'm not the one having his dirty laundry and failed character held up to the light of day. you are just the one inistsing that irelavant info must be repated over and over again Dirty laundry, bull**** I am admit to being Bisexual I admit to being Pagan. I admit to spelling poorly Now what that has to do with Ham radio or policy therin I don't know Stop beating the poor dead equine, please your judgement of "failed character" only by perhaps by YOUR standards fine so my Stevies standard my character is poor Grow up and move on Stop beating the poor dead equine, please 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! which even if true (and franky you have a real sample problem) has nothing to do with the statement No...not "...even if true..." yes even if true Then it's true and we've found something else we can agree on. nope another or are you goingto pull a Clinton and start a debate on the meaning of the word "IF" Grow up Stop beating the poor dead equine, please You're idiotic and narrow brained. Stop beating the poor dead equine, please Good show. glad you have enjoyed it sadist Stop beating the poor dead equine, please You are the close to most narrowminded idoit haolding a Ham license. Just when I think I can't laugh any harder, Mark pushes the button one more time! mashochist as well I guess they do often go together BBBWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! why must you make it even harder to just read and format you bull**** with these outbrusts? Stop beating the poor dead equine, please Yo Doc was the worst I know of You mean he was more aggressive in rubbing your nose in your own droppings. No I don't I mean what I mean, not what you in your warped mind say I mean Stop beating the poor dead equine, please I can live with that. yes you can so? It's absolutely true. nope Yep. Nope you are norrow minded "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! thinking somebody snide makes one an idiot No...YOU calling Hans "snide" for having the temerity to actually think he was doing you a favor by answering your question for you in an accurate and prompt manner makes you an idiot. Well he amswered some OTHER question not mine and not one tht had been asked You asked about the "60 meter band" and about what mode could be used there. No Iasked wether CW could be use on the 60 M band He answered you precisely. nope You responded in your typical idiotic, kneejerk fashion, once again showing the world what kind of "man" Mark Morgan is. a better man than you well then Hoist you idiot Huh...?!?! "Hoist you"...?!?! yes aren't well enough educated "Hoist you"...?!?! yep go look it up "yes aren't well enough educated"...?!?! yes it is true you don't seem to be well enough educated Mark, there's not one coherent thought there...Not to the rest of the world, anyway. more overblown bull**** Stevie Blunder speaker onbehalf of the world Some gay pagan salute? Nope and more of your gaybashing more of your pagan bashing What gaybashing? Yours What pagan bashing? yours Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... hack Yes, Mark...that's what you do best... why thank you That I lack a knowledge of the arcane ways in which mode were described is NOT disputed by me It's not arcane. it is arcane It's "here and now". It's codified into the regulations for a federal license that YOU hold and are required to at least be familiar with. One being codised in regs does NOT mean it is not Arcane? Indeed most Federal regs are the very defination of Arcane Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. "2K8J3E" is broken down into two parts. 2K8 and J3E. Years ago, A1 was CW. F3 was FM. A3 was AM. Well, they clarified the emission types to indicate whether a signal was single sideband, double sideband, independent sidebands and whether the carrier was suppressed, reduced, or full carrier. I have seen fragment of this but in my reading of way part 97 recently I don't recall it Becasue you skipped over the parts not written in crayon, Mark. more venom J3E refers to the emission type. I have a strong suspicion that 2K8 represents a 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth. you may well be right but even you don't know, not a slame on you but pointing that you clearly know better than are not sure how can I be expected to know it You can be expected to at least know where to find the information since you ARE responsible for it as a Commisssion licensee of an Amateur Radio station. expected sure I am expected by you to do lots of stuff Required no BTW exactly where are they defined by paragraph Oh font of Knowledge rival of the Oracle of Delphi I don't know them all either, but I know where to find out. The Guide me Oh truely tremenous one (the title of the great Goblin of the Misty Moutian, JRR tolkien) We often refer to single sideband, fm, cw, or whatever. The nomenclature that Steve put forth is a formal one that pins down the emission type and Corecting you Hans put it forth, Steve is taking me to task for not knowing it No, not at all. Yes Indeed Hans put it forth that is corect but you are right I was merely guessing at what you are upto. I rarely know and hardly care exactly what you are upto I am taking you to task for treating Hans so rudely then lying about it afterwards. and Hans can't defend himself? I was rdue to Han's he was rude to me. Why are (to use a comon figure of speech)you allowing your panties to get into such bunch over it? So Steve may have been a little strong in his wording, but his conclusion was not in error. You appear to have little knowledge of emission types/bandwidth occupancy. Agreed and Steve and for that Hans know this and choose to give an answer technical correct (is it in fact technicaly correct) but dsigned to be useless to me It was only useless to you since you refused to follow-up on it from there. which does not alter the FACT the answer was useless as given You wanted spoon-fed, written in crayon answers. No crayon needed You take me to task when I don't answer your yes or no questions.I have the same right as you do Hans' only mistake was assuming that you might be albe to understand the answer. gee Hans can't defend himself Not slamming you, but Steve was not entirely remiss in his post. I accept thatyou intend no slam but I miss you have missed Stevies intent There's no "intent" on my part, Mark. If you say there was no intent on your part then we chalk up another lie. you intended something You asked a question. You got the answer. You then insulted the respondant and called him a liar. yes I askeda question No I did not I did rebuke the respondant (it is his place to ecide if he was insulted) rudely if you like Never called him a lair You were wrong on several levels. nope You owe Hans Brakob an apology. IF he asks I will consider it But not on your say so Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Big Snip To The Funny Stuff: It's "here and now". It's codified into the regulations for a federal license that YOU hold and are required to at least be familiar with. One being codised in regs does NOT mean it is not Arcane? Indeed most Federal regs are the very defination of Arcane Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! And by the way...Yes you ARE required to be familiar with Part 97. Ask the FCC. I have seen fragment of this but in my reading of way part 97 recently I don't recall it Becasue you skipped over the parts not written in crayon, Mark. more venom Nope. J3E refers to the emission type. I have a strong suspicion that 2K8 represents a 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth. you may well be right but even you don't know, not a slame on you but pointing that you clearly know better than are not sure how can I be expected to know it You can be expected to at least know where to find the information since you ARE responsible for it as a Commisssion licensee of an Amateur Radio station. expected sure I am expected by you to do lots of stuff Required no Required by the FCC...Yes. BTW exactly where are they defined by paragraph Oh font of Knowledge rival of the Oracle of Delphi Where are the rules defined by paragraph? Try Part 97 you blithering idiot! Corecting you Hans put it forth, Steve is taking me to task for not knowing it No, not at all. Yes Indeed Hans put it forth that is corect but you are right I was merely guessing at what you are upto. I rarely know and hardly care exactly what you are upto I am not "upto" anything, other than showing the world that, yes, Mark C Morgan is an idiot. But so far YOU keep stealing all my glory by beating me to it. I am taking you to task for treating Hans so rudely then lying about it afterwards. and Hans can't defend himself? I was rdue to Han's Yes, you were. he was rude to me. No, he was not. Why are (to use a comon figure of speech)you allowing your panties to get into such bunch over it? Because you're so blatant in lying about it. So Steve may have been a little strong in his wording, but his conclusion was not in error. You appear to have little knowledge of emission types/bandwidth occupancy. Agreed and Steve and for that Hans know this and choose to give an answer technical correct (is it in fact technicaly correct) but dsigned to be useless to me It was only useless to you since you refused to follow-up on it from there. which does not alter the FACT the answer was useless as given Useless to YOU, perhaps... Anyone else over 12 with an interest in Amateur Radio had no problem with it. You wanted spoon-fed, written in crayon answers. No crayon needed Obviously you do. You take me to task when I don't answer your yes or no questions.I have the same right as you do Actually, I consider you to have MORE rights than I consider necesssary for myself. Being an idiot is one of them. Being a chronic liar is yet another. Help yourself to them...They were made for you. They fit you like a glove. Hans' only mistake was assuming that you might be able to understand the answer. gee Hans can't defend himself He could quite ably if he chose to. He just wouldn't enjoy rubbing your nose in your droppings as much as I do, though... Not slamming you, but Steve was not entirely remiss in his post. I accept thatyou intend no slam but I miss you have missed Stevies intent There's no "intent" on my part, Mark. If you say there was no intent on your part then we chalk up another lie. you intended something Only in that you suggest something improper. My REAL intent was to try and get you to spontaneously issue Hans an apology for your smart mouth and abuse of his rendering of information to you. Didn't work. My bad. You asked a question. You got the answer. You then insulted the respondant and called him a liar. yes I askeda question Well...SORT of a question. One can never be quite sure where your sentences start and stop, or if they were statements, quotes or questions. No I did not Lying again, Mark. If you want to lie, got lie next your your "aprtnr" for a while. Be sure to offer him some "Ben-Gay" first, though. I did rebuke the respondant (it is his place to ecide if he was insulted) rudely if you like There was nothing to "rebuke". The shortfallwas your own. Never called him a lair Good thing, too...Because you'd already called him a liar. Just one more thing might ahve set him off. You were wrong on several levels. nope Absolutely wrong on several levels. You owe Hans Brakob an apology. IF he asks I will consider it But not on your say so If you don't consider it pertinent to do so without his asking, then you're obviously not sincere. But then what else is new...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." IOW, a person can be ignorant of the law, and yet they must obey the law. Or are you too ignorant to see that? |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Big Snip To The Funny Stuff: It's "here and now". It's codified into the regulations for a federal license that YOU hold and are required to at least be familiar with. One being codised in regs does NOT mean it is not Arcane? Indeed most Federal regs are the very defination of Arcane Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. must you engage in crying Stevi BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! What spin? It is a simple matter, obvious to anyone with a brain, ah prehaps that does let you out. Obeying the rules is all that is required.In the case of mode which sparked this thread. don't need to what number letter combination is USB in order to use it, I push a botton on the rig and it does that for me And by the way...Yes you ARE required to be familiar with Part 97. Ask the FCC. Nope I have seen fragment of this but in my reading of way part 97 recently I don't recall it Becasue you skipped over the parts not written in crayon, Mark. more venom Nope. yep J3E refers to the emission type. I have a strong suspicion that 2K8 represents a 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth. you may well be right but even you don't know, not a slame on you but pointing that you clearly know better than are not sure how can I be expected to know it You can be expected to at least know where to find the information since you ARE responsible for it as a Commisssion licensee of an Amateur Radio station. expected sure I am expected by you to do lots of stuff Required no Required by the FCC...Yes. You show where the FCC requires it. by rules and paragraph I am merely required to the USE the airwaves correctly. If i di by use Tarrot definiation the FCC doesn't care. If I ID every 5 minute or 9 minutes because i don't remember the FCC requires it every 10 the FCC doesn't care Indeed in large discussions I generaly id every transmisstion since it might not get back around to me in 10 minutes BTW exactly where are they defined by paragraph Oh font of Knowledge rival of the Oracle of Delphi Where are the rules defined by paragraph? Try Part 97 you blithering idiot! Stevie thinks Part 97 is a single paragraph Corecting you Hans put it forth, Steve is taking me to task for not knowing it No, not at all. Yes Indeed Hans put it forth that is corect but you are right I was merely guessing at what you are upto. I rarely know and hardly care exactly what you are upto I am not "upto" anything, other than showing the world that, yes, Mark C Morgan is an idiot. well if you are not lieing yet again you say I do that already Instaead the turth is you up to stalking and harassment but everyone (except perhaps you) knows that But so far YOU keep stealing all my glory by beating me to it. Then shut up if showing me an idoit is your sole goal and you you feel I am beating you to it You just manged to prove YOURself a lair I am taking you to task for treating Hans so rudely then lying about it afterwards. and Hans can't defend himself? I was rdue to Han's Yes, you were. and you say Hans can't defend himself? he was rude to me. No, he was not. Yes he was. Only I can decide what I consider rude treatment Why are (to use a comon figure of speech)you allowing your panties to get into such bunch over it? Because you're so blatant in lying about it. no lie at all, a defference of opinion perhaps but (hear I guess is a newsflash stevie) I don't have to agree with you So Steve may have been a little strong in his wording, but his conclusion was not in error. You appear to have little knowledge of emission types/bandwidth occupancy. Agreed and Steve and for that Hans know this and choose to give an answer technical correct (is it in fact technicaly correct) but dsigned to be useless to me It was only useless to you since you refused to follow-up on it from there. which does not alter the FACT the answer was useless as given Useless to YOU, perhaps... indeed as stated More dead equine kicking stevie Anyone else over 12 with an interest in Amateur Radio had no problem with it. a hyperbole at least, I can at least one other person other 12 with an interest in Ham radio hwho did not understand it You wanted spoon-fed, written in crayon answers. No crayon needed Obviously you do. nope indeed crayon would not have help All that was required was a simple yes or no answer You go on for days and day when I decline to give YOU one You take me to task when I don't answer your yes or no questions.I have the same right as you do Actually, I consider you to have MORE rights than I consider necesssary for myself. auf Anglish bitte Being an idiot is one of them. Being a chronic liar is yet another. Then if you "grant" me these "rights" why do you haraas me for using them? Help yourself to them...They were made for you. They fit you like a glove. Then grant me the rights you say I have and get on the topic of Ham Radio, instead of people bashing Hans' only mistake was assuming that you might be able to understand the answer. gee Hans can't defend himself He could quite ably if he chose to. then let him He just wouldn't enjoy rubbing your nose in your droppings as much as I do, though... Ah admiting to sadism again, but... to work, it real has have some substance Not slamming you, but Steve was not entirely remiss in his post. I accept thatyou intend no slam but I miss you have missed Stevies intent There's no "intent" on my part, Mark. If you say there was no intent on your part then we chalk up another lie. you intended something Only in that you suggest something improper. My REAL intent was to try and get you to spontaneously issue Hans an apology for your smart mouth and abuse of his rendering of information to you. That is an improper intent, and one doomed to failure, In addition I claim the right to respond to what you post , and deny any responiblity to figure out what other crap is lurking in your mind Didn't work. My bad. a begining You asked a question. You got the answer. You then insulted the respondant and called him a liar. yes I askeda question Well...SORT of a question. One can never be quite sure where your sentences start and stop, or if they were statements, quotes or questions. then indeed if you can't figure it out you don't know wether or not you understand it No I did not Lying again, Mark. I know the question even if you don't therefore ONLY I know if I got the answer, you by your own addmission can't If you want to lie, got lie next your your "aprtnr" for a while. Be sure to offer him some "Ben-Gay" first, though. Gee you know the gender of my partner? I have made a point of not mentioning that takes a lot of typing in english. Been stalking me more closely than I think or making stuff up again? I did rebuke the respondant (it is his place to ecide if he was insulted) rudely if you like There was nothing to "rebuke". yes there was. his failure to answer a yes or no question The shortfallwas your own. what? Nope If i follow you then you explain how a string of number s can be answer to "Is my impression correct" Never called him a lair Good thing, too...Because you'd already called him a liar. Just one more thing might ahve set him off. If Hans lies i may well call him on it to date I have heard nothing I'd clearly a lie. I have my doubts on some details of some of his stories but I don't care enough to follow up OTOH I don't care wether I set Hans off BTW are you ever going to bother to learn to spell the word "Have"? You were wrong on several levels. nope Absolutely wrong on several levels. not at all on any level You owe Hans Brakob an apology. IF he asks I will consider it But not on your say so If you don't consider it pertinent to do so without his asking, then you're obviously not sincere. Not at all Hans (nor anyone else) is entitled an apology where no offense was intended with indaicating in some form he was offended But then what else is new...?!?! another stveie falsehood Is theire a manual of this fake socail rules or do you just make it all up as I said I'll consider apologizing to hans if he asks, but I apologize to NONE on your say so Stevie Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Big Snip To The Funny Stuff: It's "here and now". It's codified into the regulations for a federal license that YOU hold and are required to at least be familiar with. One being codised in regs does NOT mean it is not Arcane? Indeed most Federal regs are the very defination of Arcane Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. must you engage in crying Stevi I'm not. But I AM laughing at you... Again... BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! What spin? It is a simple matter, obvious to anyone with a brain, ah prehaps that does let you out. It IS a spin, Markie... Answer my question, please... How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? Obeying the rules is all that is required.In the case of mode which sparked this thread. How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? don't need to what number letter combination is USB in order to use it, I push a botton on the rig and it does that for me How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? And by the way...Yes you ARE required to be familiar with Part 97. Ask the FCC. Nope Uh huh...about what I figured... You can be expected to at least know where to find the information since you ARE responsible for it as a Commisssion licensee of an Amateur Radio station. expected sure I am expected by you to do lots of stuff Required no Required by the FCC...Yes. You show where the FCC requires it. by rules and paragraph The line on the back of your license where it says you will abide by FCC rules and regualtions as thhey pertain to your Amateur Radio station. I am merely required to the USE the airwaves correctly. If i di by use Tarrot definiation the FCC doesn't care. Sure they do. Show me a Tarot (...not Tarrot) card deck that has Part 97 in it. If I ID every 5 minute or 9 minutes because i don't remember the FCC requires it every 10 the FCC doesn't care The FCC doesn't care if you "ID" once a minute...As long as there's no more than a 10 minute interval between them. Then they care. Read recent FCC NOV's and NAL's...Read the ARRL's webpage that cites letters sent to Amateurs who violated that very paragraph. Indeed in large discussions I generaly id every transmisstion since it might not get back around to me in 10 minutes If you didn't cause RF to be emitted, it doesn't matter. BTW exactly where are they defined by paragraph Oh font of Knowledge rival of the Oracle of Delphi Where are the rules defined by paragraph? Try Part 97 you blithering idiot! Stevie thinks Part 97 is a single paragraph The rules ARE defined in paragraphs in Part 97, Markie. If you meant only ONE paragraph, that was due to YOUR failure to effectively express that thought... Maybe a gradeshcool English writing course would help you... Instaead the turth is you up to stalking and harassment but everyone (except perhaps you) knows that Nope. You came here. No one forced you. But so far YOU keep stealing all my glory by beating me to it. Then shut up if showing me an idoit is your sole goal and you you feel I am beating you to it There's that "idoit" thing again. You're holding at 100%. You just manged to prove YOURself a lair I am not a lair. Nor am I a liar. I am taking you to task for treating Hans so rudely then lying about it afterwards. and Hans can't defend himself? I was rdue to Han's Yes, you were. and you say Hans can't defend himself? Nope. That's YOU "forging" my words. he was rude to me. No, he was not. Yes he was. Only I can decide what I consider rude treatment No. Society can set the parameters by which rude treatment is determined. In no way shape or form did Hans cross that line. YOU did, however.... Anyone else over 12 with an interest in Amateur Radio had no problem with it. a hyperbole at least, I can at least one other person other 12 with an interest in Ham radio hwho did not understand it I think they need to disperse flyers in your town warning them about you...No one should allow a 12 year old alone with you. Then if you "grant" me these "rights" why do you haraas me for using them? I don't "grant" you anything. Help yourself to them...They were made for you. They fit you like a glove. Then grant me the rights you say I have and get on the topic of Ham Radio, instead of people bashing I am not people bashing. Hans' only mistake was assuming that you might be able to understand the answer. gee Hans can't defend himself He could quite ably if he chose to. then let him But I am having such fun showing you for the rude creep that you are. But it's easy fun...You don't make it much of a challenge. He just wouldn't enjoy rubbing your nose in your droppings as much as I do, though... Ah admiting to sadism again, but... to work, it real has have some substance Sure it does... Folks can just surf Google under any of your "KONSTANS" nomme-de-guerre's you have used. Only in that you suggest something improper. My REAL intent was to try and get you to spontaneously issue Hans an apology for your smart mouth and abuse of his rendering of information to you. That is an improper intent, and one doomed to failure Doomed to failure, perhaps. Not improper, however. In addition I claim the right to respond to what you post , and deny any responiblity to figure out what other crap is lurking in your mind Didn't work. My bad. a begining You missed the point again, but hey, what's new...?!?! If you want to lie, got lie next your your "aprtnr" for a while. Be sure to offer him some "Ben-Gay" first, though. Gee you know the gender of my partner? I have made a point of not mentioning that takes a lot of typing in english. Been stalking me more closely than I think or making stuff up again? Nope. If you weren't such an idiot you'd remember what you wrote a week ago. Or more MarkieLying..?!?! I did rebuke the respondant (it is his place to ecide if he was insulted) rudely if you like There was nothing to "rebuke". yes there was. his failure to answer a yes or no question So he's "guilty" for imparting MORE knowledge than you are capble of processing... But you STILL couldn't be polite to him and ask for a better clarification if you didn't understand...?!?! Good thing, too...Because you'd already called him a liar. Just one more thing might ahve set him off. If Hans lies i may well call him on it to date I have heard nothing I'd clearly a lie. I have my doubts on some details of some of his stories but I don't care enough to follow up OTOH I don't care wether I set Hans off You should. BTW are you ever going to bother to learn to spell the word "Have"? Lessee..... I OCCASSIONALLY transpose "h" and "a"... As opposed to your near-every sentence errors? That's a load! BTW...Getting your "partner" to do your writing lately? You were wrong on several levels. nope Absolutely wrong on several levels. not at all on any level Wrong. You owe Hans Brakob an apology. IF he asks I will consider it But not on your say so If you don't consider it pertinent to do so without his asking, then you're obviously not sincere. Not at all Absolutely. Hans (nor anyone else) is entitled an apology where no offense was intended with indaicating in some form he was offended Obviously he was. But then what else is new...?!?! another stveie falsehood Nope. Is theire a manual of this fake socail rules or do you just make it all up as I said I'll consider apologizing to hans if he asks, but I apologize to NONE on your say so Stevie And like I said...if you haven't got the cajones to jsut offer him a sincere apology on your own, it's not..well...sincere... Steve, K4YZ |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Big Snip To The Funny Stuff: It's "here and now". It's codified into the regulations for a federal license that YOU hold and are required to at least be familiar with. One being codised in regs does NOT mean it is not Arcane? Indeed most Federal regs are the very defination of Arcane Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. must you engage in crying Stevi I'm not. But I AM laughing at you... Again... BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! break I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! What spin? It is a simple matter, obvious to anyone with a brain, ah prehaps that does let you out. It IS a spin, Markie... nope it isn't Answer my question, please... How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? well the regular you are referring to by punching the botton on my radio, Yeaszu and FCC have seen to it that it generates legal types of signals wether i know the letter codes or not My rig will not tranmit out band so I am covered there Obeying the rules is all that is required.In the case of mode which sparked this thread. How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? several methods are possible such apllaince operating not operating also insures I don't break the rules one could count on simple luck (not wise but possible) I am sure there are additional examples don't need to what number letter combination is USB in order to use it, I push a botton on the rig and it does that for me How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? asked and answered And by the way...Yes you ARE required to be familiar with Part 97. Ask the FCC. Nope Uh huh...about what I figured... I am required to obey not understand Nothing in part 97 says I have to understand it You can be expected to at least know where to find the information since you ARE responsible for it as a Commisssion licensee of an Amateur Radio station. expected sure I am expected by you to do lots of stuff Required no Required by the FCC...Yes. You show where the FCC requires it. by rules and paragraph The line on the back of your license where it says you will abide by FCC rules and regualtions as thhey pertain to your Amateur Radio station. ....Abide by the FCC rules and regulation... nothing about understanding them there another Stevie LIE I am merely required to the USE the airwaves correctly. If i di by use Tarrot definiation the FCC doesn't care. Sure they do. prove it. or even show something that suggests it Show me a Tarot (...not Tarrot) card deck that has Part 97 in it. Tarrot Torot and Tarot are all vaild speling of the words and you question merely shows you ignorance of the Tarrot If I ID every 5 minute or 9 minutes because i don't remember the FCC requires it every 10 the FCC doesn't care The FCC doesn't care if you "ID" once a minute...As long as there's no more than a 10 minute interval between them. which I am fine if I id every signal I send regards of what I rember about the rules Then they care. Read recent FCC NOV's and NAL's...Read the ARRL's webpage that cites letters sent to Amateurs who violated that very paragraph. your point? Indeed in large discussions I generaly id every transmisstion since it might not get back around to me in 10 minutes If you didn't cause RF to be emitted, it doesn't matter. not by what I hear maybe I just don't understand, and htta is what what some of the old timers claim very loudy at time when they break and play radio cop BTW exactly where are they defined by paragraph Oh font of Knowledge rival of the Oracle of Delphi Where are the rules defined by paragraph? Try Part 97 you blithering idiot! Stevie thinks Part 97 is a single paragraph The rules ARE defined in paragraphs in Part 97, Markie. you have been asked for a citaion by paragraph All federal reg are numbered by section and most by paragraph If you meant only ONE paragraph, that was due to YOUR failure to effectively express that thought... I don't know how paragraphs you would need to cite So I don't mean One para or ten you claim to know so you tell me Maybe a gradeshcool English writing course would help you... nope You learning what the rule say instead what you think they say is what is needed Instaead the turth is you up to stalking and harassment but everyone (except perhaps you) knows that Nope. You came here. No one forced you. so You claim you have the right to stalk and harrass anyone that comes in your feild of vision? But so far YOU keep stealing all my glory by beating me to it. Then shut up if showing me an idoit is your sole goal and you you feel I am beating you to it There's that "idoit" thing again. so You're holding at 100%. You just manged to prove YOURself a lair I am not a lair. Nor am I a liar. yes you are I am taking you to task for treating Hans so rudely then lying about it afterwards. and Hans can't defend himself? I was rdue to Han's Yes, you were. and you say Hans can't defend himself? Nope. That's YOU "forging" my words. then explain what you are doing he was rude to me. No, he was not. Yes he was. Only I can decide what I consider rude treatment No. Society can set the parameters by which rude treatment is determined. not ture In no way shape or form did Hans cross that line. says you? even IF I grant your "No. Society can set the parameters by which rude treatment is determined" you are not empowered to act for Society, trying to do is what Makes you a Vigilanty something form another thread. YOU did, however.... Auf anglish bitte is a phrase forbidden by Society? Bull**** Anyone else over 12 with an interest in Amateur Radio had no problem with it. a hyperbole at least, I can at least one other person other 12 with an interest in Ham radio hwho did not understand it I think they need to disperse flyers in your town warning them about you...No one should allow a 12 year old alone with you. and more libel from you If I thought you had anything worth taking that is enough to take you to court for Stevie, at least in the Opinion of a paralegal (my partner not me) Then if you "grant" me these "rights" why do you haraas me for using them? I don't "grant" you anything. then you were lieing when you made the statement " Actually, I consider you to have MORE rights than I consider necesssary for myself. Being an idiot is one of them. Being a chronic liar is yet another. Help yourself to them...They were made for you. They fit you like a glove. " your word not mine you cut them out ofyour last post but by your words I have those rights and if I am merely exercising them what right do you have to complain Help yourself to them...They were made for you. They fit you like a glove. Then grant me the rights you say I have and get on the topic of Ham Radio, instead of people bashing I am not people bashing. you only engage in personal attack you edit stuff to cover your tracks Hans' only mistake was assuming that you might be able to understand the answer. gee Hans can't defend himself He could quite ably if he chose to. then let him But I am having such fun showing you for the rude creep that you are. But it's easy fun...You don't make it much of a challenge. He just wouldn't enjoy rubbing your nose in your droppings as much as I do, though... Ah admiting to sadism again, but... to work, it real has have some substance Sure it does... Folks can just surf Google under any of your "KONSTANS" nomme-de-guerre's you have used. your point? or do you have one? Only in that you suggest something improper. My REAL intent was to try and get you to spontaneously issue Hans an apology for your smart mouth and abuse of his rendering of information to you. That is an improper intent, and one doomed to failure Doomed to failure, perhaps. a begining boyo Not improper, however. It is imporper In addition I claim the right to respond to what you post , and deny any responiblity to figure out what other crap is lurking in your mind Didn't work. My bad. a begining You missed the point again, but hey, what's new...?!?! You had a point? If you want to lie, got lie next your your "aprtnr" for a while. Be sure to offer him some "Ben-Gay" first, though. Gee you know the gender of my partner? I have made a point of not mentioning that takes a lot of typing in english. Been stalking me more closely than I think or making stuff up again? Nope. If you weren't such an idiot you'd remember what you wrote a week ago. making up stuff as a point of fact my partner is female was avoiding it becuase it wasn't and isn't any of your affair Or more MarkieLying..?!?! no just Stevie lieing I did rebuke the respondant (it is his place to ecide if he was insulted) rudely if you like There was nothing to "rebuke". yes there was. his failure to answer a yes or no question So he's "guilty" for imparting MORE knowledge than you are capble of processing... He imparted no knowledge something you have already agreed But you STILL couldn't be polite to him and ask for a better clarification if you didn't understand...?!?! I did ask politely I said "Auf Anglish Bitte" I could have said "answer the question asked ****head" or other far ruder responses Good thing, too...Because you'd already called him a liar. Just one more thing might ahve set him off. If Hans lies i may well call him on it to date I have heard nothing I'd clearly a lie. I have my doubts on some details of some of his stories but I don't care enough to follow up OTOH I don't care wether I set Hans off You should. why? BTW are you ever going to bother to learn to spell the word "Have"? Lessee..... I OCCASSIONALLY transpose "h" and "a"... I can't recallseeing the word have speeled right by you in days As opposed to your near-every sentence errors? "judge not lest ye be judged" That's a load! BTW...Getting your "partner" to do your writing lately? no why do you ask? You were wrong on several levels. nope Absolutely wrong on several levels. not at all on any level Wrong. Stevie grow up You owe Hans Brakob an apology. IF he asks I will consider it But not on your say so If you don't consider it pertinent to do so without his asking, then you're obviously not sincere. Not at all Absolutely. Stevie YOU insting on means it will not happen if hans asks I will consider it If Jim Ney asks I will consider it, but the more you go the less likely i will do it I do nothing to please you Hans (nor anyone else) is entitled an apology where no offense was intended with indaicating in some form he was offended Obviously he was. obviously was what? auf anglish bitte But then what else is new...?!?! another stveie falsehood Nope. yes Is theire a manual of this fake socail rules or do you just make it all up as I said I'll consider apologizing to hans if he asks, but I apologize to NONE on your say so Stevie And like I said...if you haven't got the cajones to jsut offer him a sincere apology on your own, it's not..well...sincere... oh I see what you mean now took you long enough to say what you mean (if you are saying what you mean now) Then you have been chasing a wild goose form moment one in this thread since of course If aplogize to Hans now you will not consider it sincere, so logicly thier is certianly no point in my doing so Steve, K4YZ |
b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." IOW, a person can be ignorant of the law, and yet they must obey the law. Or are you too ignorant to see that? Why Steve no answer? |
b.b. wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." IOW, a person can be ignorant of the law, and yet they must obey the law. Or are you too ignorant to see that? Why Steve no answer? Because he is too busy figuring out more name to call me most likely after he is plain wrong esp when he rests that on my not knowing the codes for pushing button like FM on my rig |
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Answer my question, please... How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? well the regular you are referring to by punching the botton on my radio, Yeaszu and FCC have seen to it that it generates legal types of signals wether i know the letter codes or not You are responsible for the proper operation of your radio station. Yeasu (NOT "Yeaszu") is NOT responsible for the emissions of the radio. My rig will not tranmit out band so I am covered there Bravo Sierra. E V E R Y RF generating device has the potential of radiating a signal other than the one designed for. Ask Lennie. Obeying the rules is all that is required.In the case of mode which sparked this thread. How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? several methods are possible such apllaince operating "Apllaince operating" does not make you familiar with FCC rules and regulations. It makes you an "apllaince" operator...that's all. not operating also insures I don't break the rules And keeps them free of your "dreck". one could count on simple luck (not wise but possible) I am sure there are additional examples None of which meet the letter of the spirit of the law. SO you're bascially saying that you don't care what the rules are, you'll just do what you darn well please. don't need to what number letter combination is USB in order to use it, I push a botton on the rig and it does that for me How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? asked and answered Asked and answered with stupid answers. (...as if I expected anything different...?!?!) And by the way...Yes you ARE required to be familiar with Part 97. Ask the FCC. Nope Uh huh...about what I figured... I am required to obey not understand And you STILL have not adequately explained how you can "obey" laws that you do not understand. Nothing in part 97 says I have to understand it Your signature on FCC form 660 an the provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 in Section 310 and others do. And yes, you're supposed to know them. You sign the document. The line on the back of your license where it says you will abide by FCC rules and regualtions as thhey pertain to your Amateur Radio station. ...Abide by the FCC rules and regulation... nothing about understanding them there another Stevie LIE Nope. You cannot "abide" by laws you do not understand. I am merely required to the USE the airwaves correctly. If i di by use Tarrot definiation the FCC doesn't care. Sure they do. prove it. or even show something that suggests it Done. http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices Show me a Tarot (...not Tarrot) card deck that has Part 97 in it. Tarrot Torot and Tarot are all vaild speling of the words and you question merely shows you ignorance of the Tarrot I know that it's spelled "Tarot" in English. Indeed in large discussions I generaly id every transmisstion since it might not get back around to me in 10 minutes If you didn't cause RF to be emitted, it doesn't matter. not by what I hear maybe I just don't understand, and htta is what what some of the old timers claim very loudy at time when they break and play radio cop Perhaps if you knew the laws that you are governed by you wouldn't have to depend on "...not by what I hear..." And yes, you DON'T understand. Being wilfully ignorant doesn't excuse you from compliance. Instaead the turth is you up to stalking and harassment but everyone (except perhaps you) knows that Nope. You came here. No one forced you. so You claim you have the right to stalk and harrass anyone that comes in your feild of vision? I'm not stalking anyone nor am I harassing anyone. You voluntarilly reply to these posts. No one dragged you here. But so far YOU keep stealing all my glory by beating me to it. Then shut up if showing me an idoit is your sole goal and you you feel I am beating you to it There's that "idoit" thing again. so So you've proven yourself wrong. Over and over. You're holding at 100%. You just manged to prove YOURself a lair I am not a lair. Nor am I a liar. yes you are Nope. You SAY I am a liar, but you've not yet shown a single one. (Websters refers...) and you say Hans can't defend himself? Nope. That's YOU "forging" my words. then explain what you are doing I've not forged a single word, Markie. Look up the definition of "forged" in Websters. No. Society can set the parameters by which rude treatment is determined. not ture Absolutely "ture". In no way shape or form did Hans cross that line. says you? Says everyone EXCEPT you. even IF I grant your...(SNIP) You're not empowered to "grant" me anything, Markie. You haven't got the proper genetics. YOU did, however.... Auf anglish bitte is a phrase forbidden by Society? Where did I say it was? (Even if you continue to mispell the germanic reference to "English" Bull#### Yes, You are. I think they need to disperse flyers in your town warning them about you...No one should allow a 12 year old alone with you. and more libel from you Nope. Fact. Based upon your own words. If I thought you had anything worth taking that is enough to take you to court for Stevie, at least in the Opinion of a paralegal (my partner not me) Uh huh...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight! I don't know who the bigger idiot would be... You for trying to file such a "case" considering the tons of admissions of sexual perversion and wilfull mistruthfulness on your part, Or your "partner" for suggesting such might be possible considering the aforementioned evidence that exists in Google archives. Then if you "grant" me these "rights" why do you haraas me for using them? I don't "grant" you anything. then you were lieing when you made the statement I never "granted" you anything. Those are YOUR words...Not mine, you "forger" ! ! ! " Actually, I consider you to have MORE rights than I consider necesssary for myself. Being an idiot is one of them. Being a chronic liar is yet another. Yes, you are an idiot and you are a chronic liar. I am not people bashing. you only engage in personal attack It's not an attack. It's the truth. you edit stuff to cover your tracks Nope. I "edit" stuff to keep these posts from being yards and yards long. Anyone can go back and review them if they care to...Even you.... Folks can just surf Google under any of your "KONSTANS" nomme-de-guerre's you have used. your point? or do you have one? Sure. My point is that anyone can surf Google under any of your "KONSTANS" nomme-de-guerre's you've used and see what kind of a lyig creep you are. They can also surf KB9RQZ, "MWMORGAN" and a plethora of othr names you've come and gone under as you bounce from ISP to ISP... Speaking of which, I can only hope and pray that you finally ditched that ISP you alleged was charging you $5/hr. Only in that you suggest something improper. My REAL intent was to try and get you to spontaneously issue Hans an apology for your smart mouth and abuse of his rendering of information to you. That is an improper intent, and one doomed to failure Doomed to failure, perhaps. a begining boyo Huh? Not improper, however. It is imporper What's "imporper"...??? Nope. If you weren't such an idiot you'd remember what you wrote a week ago. making up stuff as a point of fact my partner is female was avoiding it becuase it wasn't and isn't any of your affair Your sister? Or mom? No self-respecting English speaking woman I know would tolerate a professed liar like you unless they were in your gene pool or your will. So he's "guilty" for imparting MORE knowledge than you are capble of processing... He imparted no knowledge something you have already agreed No, I have NOT agreed. Hans clearly DID "impart knowledge"...YOU, on the otherhand, were just too stupid to assimilate it. But you STILL couldn't be polite to him and ask for a better clarification if you didn't understand...?!?! I did ask politely I said "Auf Anglish Bitte" Why do you insist on trying to look like you can speak German when you clearly can't even do it in English? I could have said "answer the question asked ####head" or other far ruder responses You basically said that anyway. That WAS the nature, if not verbatim, response. I OCCASSIONALLY transpose "h" and "a"... I can't recallseeing the word have speeled right by you in days Becasue you haven't been paying attention. Scroll back. As opposed to your near-every sentence errors? "judge not lest ye be judged" I'll take my chances. If you don't consider it pertinent to do so without his asking, then you're obviously not sincere. Not at all Absolutely. Stevie YOU insting on means it will not happen if hans asks I will consider it If Jim Ney asks I will consider it, but the more you go the less likely i will do it I do nothing to please you Sure you do. And who's "Jim Ney"...??? Hans (nor anyone else) is entitled an apology where no offense was intended with indaicating in some form he was offended Obviously he was. obviously was what? auf anglish bitte If you're going to ask a question, Markie, regardless of the language you're trying to abuse, please use the proper punctuation. And what part of "offended" do you not understand? And like I said...if you haven't got the cajones to just offer him a sincere apology on your own, it's not..well...sincere... oh I see what you mean now took you long enough to say what you mean (if you are saying what you mean now)...(SNIP) Huh? Then you have been chasing a wild goose form...(SNIP) A "wild goose form"..?!?! Is that as opposed to a tame goose form? How can you tell? (UNSNIP)...moment one in this thread since of course If aplogize to Hans now you will not consider it sincere, so logicly thier is certianly no point in my doing so Sure there is... Because it's the right thing to do. If that's not reason enough, I don't know what is... Steve, K4YZ |
an_old_idiot wrote:
My rig will not tranmit out band so I am covered there So what about the sub-bands you are allowed/not allowed to operate on with you tech license? Do you know which part of the band you are allowed to operate according to your license? Your Yeasu rig sure doesn't know. Do you just depend on something else to keep you legal instead of knowing the rules yourself? Looks like if your rig isn't smart enough know the rules you're in trouble, because you sure don't seem that smart. I am required to obey not understand Nothing in part 97 says I have to understand it So how do you intend to obey rules you don't understand? |
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Answer my question, please... How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? well the regular you are referring to by punching the botton on my radio, Yeaszu and FCC have seen to it that it generates legal types of signals wether i know the letter codes or not You are responsible for the proper operation of your radio station. agreed Yeasu (NOT "Yeaszu") is NOT responsible for the emissions of the radio. agreed but it can none the less be relied on to to make the right emissions, indeed I can'r tell if it were not neither can most Hams Can you test YOUR rig to see that it complies with the rules My rig will not tranmit out band so I am covered there Bravo Sierra. Alpha Tango E V E R Y RF generating device has the potential of radiating a signal other than the one designed for. yep it does your point If your radio was doing how would YOU know Ask Lennie. why you aran't saying something I don't know Obeying the rules is all that is required.In the case of mode which sparked this thread. How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? several methods are possible such apllaince operating "Apllaince operating" does not make you familiar with FCC rules and regulations. never said it did It makes you an "apllaince" operator...that's all. and makes it a very high likelyhood that I am following the rules not operating also insures I don't break the rules And keeps them free of your "dreck". But the method would work for keeping in complaince one could count on simple luck (not wise but possible) I am sure there are additional examples None of which meet the letter of the spirit of the law. The letter of spirit of the law? Auf anglish Bittie I am only required to obey the letter of the law. I don't have to obey the Spirit of the law, if I can even devine such without a seance/ The letter of the spririt in nonsense SO you're bascially saying that you don't care what the rules are, you'll just do what you darn well please. nope not at all never said that don't need to what number letter combination is USB in order to use it, I push a botton on the rig and it does that for me How do you comply with the regulations if you aren't "familiar" with them...??? asked and answered Asked and answered with stupid answers. stupid to your mind sure maybe but not incorrect (...as if I expected anything different...?!?!) And by the way...Yes you ARE required to be familiar with Part 97. Ask the FCC. Nope Uh huh...about what I figured... I am required to obey not understand And you STILL have not adequately explained how you can "obey" laws that you do not understand. I have indeed done so I given you an example abolsutely certian of compling and 2 others that are safe enough what more is required Nothing in part 97 says I have to understand it Your signature on FCC form 660 an the provisions of the Communications Act of 1934 in Section 310 and others do. not sure I ever signed a form 660 may have not sure But the courts have ruled that no one need understand tany rule or law in order to be held to it, therefore it must be legaly possible to obey without understanding And yes, you're supposed to know them. You sign the document. Supposed, gee that isn't required merely supposed The line on the back of your license where it says you will abide by FCC rules and regualtions as thhey pertain to your Amateur Radio station. ...Abide by the FCC rules and regulation... nothing about understanding them there another Stevie LIE Nope. yes it says will abide not will understand You cannot "abide" by laws you do not understand. yes you can I am merely required to the USE the airwaves correctly. If i di by use Tarrot definiation the FCC doesn't care. Sure they do. prove it. or even show something that suggests it Done. nope http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices so what nothing on the pages sates or suggests that the FCC cares wether the cited enities knew the rules Show me a Tarot (...not Tarrot) card deck that has Part 97 in it. Tarrot Torot and Tarot are all vaild speling of the words and you question merely shows you ignorance of the Tarrot I know that it's spelled "Tarot" in English. how ? when did you become the supreme arbiter of english Indeed in large discussions I generaly id every transmisstion since it might not get back around to me in 10 minutes If you didn't cause RF to be emitted, it doesn't matter. not by what I hear maybe I just don't understand, and htta is what what some of the old timers claim very loudy at time when they break and play radio cop Perhaps if you knew the laws that you are governed by you wouldn't have to depend on "...not by what I hear..." perhaps if everyone was a decent human being there would be not need for laws or what if angel danced on pin heads But givent he behavooir of others I choose to ID every signal to avoid the wanna be radio cops My choice and the FCC doesn't care And yes, you DON'T understand. Being wilfully ignorant doesn't excuse you from compliance. No it doesn't never said it did, but complaince and even willfull ignorance are possible and legal Instaead the turth is you up to stalking and harassment but everyone (except perhaps you) knows that Nope. You came here. No one forced you. so You claim you have the right to stalk and harrass anyone that comes in your feild of vision? I'm not stalking anyone nor am I harassing anyone. lair You voluntarilly reply to these posts. so YOU made the posts concerning my sexuality etc you did so with the intent to harras No one dragged you here. so But so far YOU keep stealing all my glory by beating me to it. Then shut up if showing me an idoit is your sole goal and you you feel I am beating you to it There's that "idoit" thing again. so So you've proven yourself wrong. no I haven't you make the claim I have to know the rules in order to obey them you prove it I claim it is possible to obey the rules without understanding them I have done so Over and over. yes over and over ignorant cracker You're holding at 100%. You just manged to prove YOURself a lair I am not a lair. Nor am I a liar. yes you are Nope. You SAY I am a liar, but you've not yet shown a single one. (Websters refers...) I Have many times, mst ly by traping you in your inconsistanies and you say Hans can't defend himself? Nope. That's YOU "forging" my words. then explain what you are doing I've not forged a single word, Markie. yes you have Look up the definition of "forged" in Websters. do you prefer the word altered? No. Society can set the parameters by which rude treatment is determined. not ture Absolutely "ture". not ture In no way shape or form did Hans cross that line. says you? Says everyone EXCEPT you. say no one BUT you Hans hasn't even said he did not being condesending even IF I grant your...(SNIP) You're not empowered to "grant" me anything, Markie. yes I am, indeed you hold no power over that I don't grant You haven't got the proper genetics. what? judging by the health of your now dead daughter mine are at least as proper as yours YOU did, however.... Auf anglish bitte is a phrase forbidden by Society? Where did I say it was? (Even if you continue to mispell the germanic reference to "English" My response to Hans was Auf Anglish Bitte you claim I cross a line in something forbidden by society therefore you calim my response was forbidden by socity Bull#### Yes, You are. more alterations Stevie I think they need to disperse flyers in your town warning them about you...No one should allow a 12 year old alone with you. and more libel from you Nope. yes it is Fact. Stevie being fact does nopt bear on wether something is Libel Based upon your own words. what words? If I thought you had anything worth taking that is enough to take you to court for Stevie, at least in the Opinion of a paralegal (my partner not me) Uh huh...riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight! yea right you are too poor to be worth it I don't know who the bigger idiot would be... You for trying to file such a "case" considering the tons of admissions of sexual perversion and wilfull mistruthfulness on your part, Being homosexaul or bisexual is not ilegal, nor lieing on the Interent you impling I am a pedophile is and remain Libel (or slander depneding on wether the net is viewed as written or spoken) Or your "partner" for suggesting such might be possible considering the aforementioned evidence that exists in Google archives. Huh? again I can free admit to everything you I posted none of which make me a pedophile as you imply Then if you "grant" me these "rights" why do you haraas me for using them? I don't "grant" you anything. then you were lieing when you made the statement I never "granted" you anything. Those are YOUR words...Not mine, you "forger" ! ! ! your words are below agian you granted or agreed or conceeded or whatever but you said I had the rigt below\ " Actually, I consider you to have MORE rights than I consider necesssary for myself. Being an idiot is one of them. Being a chronic liar is yet another. Yes, you are an idiot and you are a chronic liar. and you yourself say I have that right so in hassling me you admit to being a lair I am not people bashing. you only engage in personal attack It's not an attack. it sure is It's the truth. If it were true that has nothing to do with wether it is a personal attack or not the 2 words have different meanings you edit stuff to cover your tracks Nope. yes you I "edit" stuff to keep these posts from being yards and yards long. you edit them in distorting ways that convently cover many of your lies Anyone can go back and review them if they care to...Even you.... and everyone know you distort lie and evade at almost every oppurturnity Folks can just surf Google under any of your "KONSTANS" nomme-de-guerre's you have used. your point? or do you have one? Sure. My point is that anyone can surf Google under any of your "KONSTANS" nomme-de-guerre's you've used and see what kind of a lyig creep you are. what is wrong with using my name online? you have changed Call sign a few times (4 changes 3 calls by my count) and where I do deny that I do lie I do reservse to right to point out where you make up things I never said, but I am not honest about many facts in my bio. I have my reasons, and it is my right. They can also surf KB9RQZ, "MWMORGAN" and a plethora of othr names you've come and gone under as you bounce from ISP to ISP... you oppose shoping for better deals on interent? Speaking of which, I can only hope and pray that you finally ditched that ISP you alleged was charging you $5/hr. well I still subcribe to their service for use when I travel, since the 5$/hour rate came wit the use of a 1-800number to reach them was cheaper than paying long distance Only in that you suggest something improper. My REAL intent was to try and get you to spontaneously issue Hans an apology for your smart mouth and abuse of his rendering of information to you. That is an improper intent, and one doomed to failure Doomed to failure, perhaps. a begining boyo Huh? a beging that you begin realize something boyo Not improper, however. It is imporper What's "imporper"...??? aren't you claiming to be the sole judge of that Stevie and you don't know Nope. If you weren't such an idiot you'd remember what you wrote a week ago. making up stuff as a point of fact my partner is female was avoiding it becuase it wasn't and isn't any of your affair Your sister? Or mom? more libel No self-respecting English speaking woman I know would tolerate a professed liar like you unless they were in your gene pool or your will. you have a limited aquantanceship, but then she is in my will of course isn't your wifein yours? as to wether she is self respecting you have never met me now you presume to judge a women you have not even read her words? So he's "guilty" for imparting MORE knowledge than you are capble of processing... He imparted no knowledge something you have already agreed No, I have NOT agreed. Hans clearly DID "impart knowledge"...YOU, on the otherhand, were just too stupid to assimilate it. whcih means you agree he imparted nothing to me, for what ever reason But you STILL couldn't be polite to him and ask for a better clarification if you didn't understand...?!?! I did ask politely I said "Auf Anglish Bitte" Why do you insist on trying to look like you can speak German when you clearly can't even do it in English? huh? I am trying to make it look like I speak german? news to me Auf Anglish bitte oder auf Deutche bitte prehaps you will make more sense in german If I wrote Je parle Fransse that would I was trying to show people I speak french? I could have said "answer the question asked ####head" or other far ruder responses You basically said that anyway. That WAS the nature, if not verbatim, response. no it wasn't I OCCASSIONALLY transpose "h" and "a"... I can't recallseeing the word have speeled right by you in days Becasue you haven't been paying attention. Scroll back. have done can't find where you spell have correctly You do seem to spell haven't ok but not Have itself it s a stranage thing As opposed to your near-every sentence errors? "judge not lest ye be judged" I'll take my chances. you certainly do If you don't consider it pertinent to do so without his asking, then you're obviously not sincere. Not at all Absolutely. Stevie YOU insting on means it will not happen if hans asks I will consider it If Jim Ney asks I will consider it, but the more you go the less likely i will do it I do nothing to please you Sure you do. reallY then of course what is your beef? And who's "Jim Ney"...??? Jim you he is round here Hans (nor anyone else) is entitled an apology where no offense was intended with indaicating in some form he was offended Obviously he was. obviously was what? auf anglish bitte If you're going to ask a question, Markie, regardless of the language you're trying to abuse, please use the proper punctuation. why? And what part of "offended" do you not understand? no part but Hans and Hans alone is a proper judge of wether Hans was offended, not Stevie, Unless of you are posting as Hans yourself and as Stevie Hans can ask and I'll consider it, Bill Sohl could ask and Id consdier it etc, I don't do it for Stevie And like I said...if you haven't got the cajones to just offer him a sincere apology on your own, it's not..well...sincere... oh I see what you mean now took you long enough to say what you mean (if you are saying what you mean now)...(SNIP) Huh? clear enough slerly than your intent has been Then you have been chasing a wild goose form...(SNIP) A "wild goose form"..?!?! Is that as opposed to a tame goose form? How can you tell? Don't you know? (UNSNIP)...moment one in this thread since of course If aplogize to Hans now you will not consider it sincere, so logicly thier is certianly no point in my doing so Sure there is... Because it's the right thing to do. according to you No it would not be since IF i were to apoligize to Hans without meaning it then I would be making another LIE, and to you lying is basical evil so NOw you want to do what you take me to task for all the time? Lie? If that's not reason enough, I don't know what is... you got that right Stevie you don't what is Steve, K4YZ |
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote: an_old_idiot wrote: forgery btw My rig will not tranmit out band so I am covered there So what about the sub-bands you are allowed/not allowed to operate on with you tech license? Do you know which part of the band you are allowed to operate according to your license? Your Yeasu rig sure doesn't know. Do you just depend on something else to keep you legal instead of knowing the rules yourself? Looks like if your rig isn't smart enough know the rules you're in trouble, because you sure don't seem that smart. gee what part of which Band has space restircted from tech operating Tech like myself Have no prevlidges below 30 MHZ and all prevlidges above Don't YOU know that? I did not say I depended on .. but that I could pretty much if I chose But there is NO current need for me to know much of anything below 30 MHZ except what concerns the aurgments I may make One's abilty to follow the rules is improved by some understanding of the rules, However may contention that it is possible not to understand and legaly operate satnds I am required to obey not understand Nothing in part 97 says I have to understand it So how do you intend to obey rules you don't understand? asked and answered |
Still No answer to this Stevie
b.b. wrote: b.b. wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Two, No I am not required to be famiar with them, I am merely required to obey them. BBBWWWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! I am going to wait with bated breath while you try to spin up an explanation as to how you are not required to "be familiar" with the regulations of the radio service in which you are a licensee, yet you ARE required to obey them.... ! ! ! break "Ignorance of the law is no excuse." IOW, a person can be ignorant of the law, and yet they must obey the law. Or are you too ignorant to see that? Why Steve no answer? Still No answer and yet you seem to have come and gone for the day That is becuase it is true |
"an_old_friend" wrote Can you test YOUR rig to see that it complies with the rules Yes, as required by §97.103(a) and §97.105(a). Can't you? 73, de Hans, K0HB |
K=D8HB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote Can you test YOUR rig to see that it complies with the rules why did you edit out the fact i was asking Stevie Yes, as required by =A797.103(a) and =A797.105(a). Sec. 97.105 Control operator duties. (a) The control operator must ensure the immediate proper operation of the station, regardless of the type of control. (b) A station may only be operated in the manner and to the extent permitted by the privileges authorized for the class of operator license held by the control operator. Sec. 97.103 Station licensee responsibilities. (a) The station licensee is responsible for the proper operation of the station in accordance with the FCC Rules. When the control operator is a different amateur operator than the station licensee, both persons are equally responsible for proper operation of the station. (b) The station licensee must designate the station control operator. The FCC will presume that the station licensee is also the control operator, unless documentation to the contrary is in the station records. (c) The station licensee must make the station and the station records available for inspection upon request by an FCC representative. When deemed necessary by an EIC to assure compliance with the FCC Rules, the station licensee must maintain a record of station operations containing such items of information as the EIC may require in accord with Sec. 0.314(x) of the FCC Rules. nothing in the citied section reqiuring me to be able to test the emission of my rig =20 Can't you? By that I don't have too =20 73, de Hans, K0HB |
an_old_friend wrote:
gee what part of which Band has space restircted from tech operating Tech like myself Have no prevlidges below 30 MHZ and all prevlidges above Don't YOU know that? I am surprised you do as you say you don't need to understand the rules. |
an_old_friend wrote:
Can you test YOUR rig to see that it complies with the rules Sure can. Can you? No? I believe that somewhere in the rules it say you should be able to. But then you don't understand the rules. |
"an_old_friend" wrote By that I don't have too If you are responsible for proper operation of your station (and those rules apply equally above 30MHz as they do below), then you must have a method to determine that your station complies with the Rules. How do you do that at your station? 73, de Hans, K0HB |
KØHB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote By that I don't have too If you are responsible for proper operation of your station (and those rules apply equally above 30MHz as they do below), then you must have a method to determine that your station complies with the Rules. How do you do that at your station? 73, de Hans, K0HB He hasn't a clue, he just hopes his radio will always work properly and even if it does it can't compensate for any misunderstanding on his part about operating it properly. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com